GC: You will have before you 408 lots in blocks 1 to 21
inclusive, J. C. Owen addition, City of Richmond California,
lying on 25th, Owen, 27th, 28th, 29th Sts., and Hamilton,
Seaver and Meeker Sts. These lots given in contract Aug. 6,
1926, to K. Perrin and contract assigned to Lord Realty Co.
of which A. E. Aerial of 118 West 82nd St., N.Y. City is
president. Contract has lapsed, and notice given of
cancellation. Will one year redemption apply to this
foreclosure? You will answer the questions which I will ask
you regarding these.
EC: Yes, we have conditions surrounding these.
Now, we find - with the lapse of contract and conditions
surrounding same - property values are much increased, by
contemplated buildings in this portion of subdivision.
While this might be forced by the manner in which notice
was served, and a forced delivery made, yet this would itself
entail troubles when developments are shown, and unless there
was the proof that there was no fore-knowledge concerning
this increased valuation, this would be taking advantage of
the other individual, and individuals so involved. Hence we
would find, considered from this viewpoint, this would be
rather a touchy proposition, unless one desired to put making
of money first.
(Q) Will one year redemption apply to this foreclosure?
(A) As given, in the manner in which the citation was made
- which is irregular, or was irregular - the delivery could
be forced, but - consider conditions surrounding same.
(Q) Can contract as written be taken up at this date upon
payment of full price? or will sellers refuse to deed the
property? Can they be made to give deed upon presentation
of purchase price?
(A) A forced issue would make the sellers delivery the
deed, yet those conditions as surround same would make
this rather an unusual, or one would be - with the knowledge
of conditions and the advancement - that of taking advantage
of another fellow, and the conditions surrounding same.
(Q) Will this be a paying proposition, taking over contract?
(A) Dependent upon what one would term paying. In dollars
and cents, yes. In troubles as would be brought by same as
the result of taking advantage, no. As to the moral
conditions as surrounded same, not so good.
(Q) Is Arthur E. Aerial a business associate with whom
[
900] and [
195] will have pleasant relations?
(A) Very good.
(Q) Is Ford plant to be built adjoining this property?
(A) Including some of same, yes.
(Q) What is approximate present value of above 408 lots?
(A) Dependent upon whether the valuation is as of present
status or of that valuation when these contracts are closed,
or operations begun. This would be a very valuable piece
of property. Forty - fifty - hundred and fifty - several
thousands of dollars, you see.
That is all the questions.
We are through with this reading.
BACKGROUND
12/11/27 He obtained business rdg.
195-48.
12/15/27 He wrote: "There is a proposition to [
900] and
myself concerning some Calif. lots that a man has a contract
on, and which is being foreclosed. We would like to have a
rdg. made on this as soon as you can, for it will have to be
acted on right away if at all. Will you wire [
900] results
of rdg.?" [See questions enclosed.]
REPORTS
1/21/28 Mr. [
195] and Mr. [
900] obtained
195-50 on Arizona
lands.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation