EC: Yes, we have the body, the enquiring mind, [
195] - this
we have had before. Also the drawing, also the motor model.
No reason why this motor doesn't work, [
195]! but with the
constructions as are seen here on the drawing, the increasing
of the size of the pinion gear with those changes as have
come in your mind, through the action of conditions as
hindered in the passing of the gear about the [drum?], and
this, as stands, should work perfectly, and will, if this
will be modeled after the idea as presented here. Wilbur
Wright. [Spirit communication? Mr. [
195] had known Wilbur
Wright when he was alive.]
Now as for conditions - Ready for questions.
(Q) With A as the center of pinion driven by the revolving
drum, O the center of end of revolving drum in running
position, and B center pinion shaft, running on ring gear at
end of revolving drum, with contact at M - We have made
radius B M same as radius of driving gear on outside of
revolving drum. This is to balance leverage. Is this
correct?
(A) This is correct. Do not change from this in this style
motor, for this will allow for the escapement in the
revolving of the drum to have sufficient activity without
binding on the upward turn.
(Q) Would this side inner pinion tend to bind at M on
uplifting of revolving drum and not feed through?
(A) Now this [was] just given! This will allow to feed
through WITHOUT binding, see?
(Q) Is B the approximate location for center of internal
pinion?
(A) B is approximate location. In fact, IS location in the
present model.
(Q) The angles are to be made as [Word or words missing on
original reading] the other drawing.
(A) Correct!
(Q) The angle at B to be [Word or words missing on original
reading] greater than that at O -
(A) Correct.
(Q) With the larger radius at M from center B there will be
less tendency for the angle of B to change when loosening up
the mesh of the gears. Is this correct?
(A) This is correct. That's just why the changing in the
pull upward will allow for it, as has been described in the
position and condition as we had in that former condition of
where it bound in its second position, or on the uplift, see?
(Q) As we understand it, gears should mesh just firmly
enough so that the rotation be easily but mesh tight enough
so that the vibrations would not be lost. Is this correct?
(A) That correct, and here we have the mesh in such a manner
that in its turn we find each are acting in their proper
coordination one with another, in its turn, see?
(Q) In the tank of the new motor the tank is made in two
exact halves. This will permit the using of the larger inner
pinions and the changing of the angles if necessary?
(A) Correct.
(Q) Are there any further recommendations?
(A) No further recommendations here at present. Remember
this, [
195]! Call on Wilbur! [Wilbur Wright] HE will
answer!
(Q) If properly built revolving tank cannot rise higher than
running position?
(A) Cannot rise higher than RUNNING position.
(Q) Is size pinion A correct or could it be made slightly
smaller?
(A) Very slightly, if any smaller, preferably in this same
ratio as has been outlined you as indicated.
That is all the questions.
See, there's another difference, [
195], with this in this
size, in the number or the angles as are gained by its
rotation in THIS size of pinion, rather than that of a
smaller or too much larger, see?
(Q) Should it be a little bigger?
(A) No bigger! THIS size! Rather interesting! We are
through with this reading.
Copy to Self
Copy to Mr. [900]
Copy to Ass'n file
BACKGROUND
6/30/29 He obtained
195-64 on motor.
7/13/29 He was present, submitting further questions.
REPORTS
8/31/29 [
195]'s letter to EC: "...We are having a tedious
time with motor, getting it into shape. Have about three
weeks more work on it and then will try it out. However, it
seems as if there may have to be some more changes relative
to proportion to driving gear and the pinion through which
expansion of vibrations is set up. We hope, however, that
this model will function enough for us to get a patent and
let the refinements come at a later date..."
9/22/29 Mr. [
195] was present for
195-66 on motor.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation