(Q) Dr. Frank Dobbins.
(A) Would be very well, but not consistent with that
outlined. There may be chosen, and as we find it would be
well to set up, those who may comprise what may be termed as
a Complementary or Advisory Board to that portion of the
Research Activities.
For, as will be seen and as has been given, and as has been
in part attempted in this and that place, it would be well
that there be those of the professions chosen for their
comment upon not only their OWN activity with the work of
the organization but as an Advisory Board of the Association
IN ITS research phase of same, see?
Now, on such a board would be such as Dobbins or ANY of those
of the profession in any school; as Shorell in a phase of
same; as Hildreth; as Singh, as those of ANY of the
professions in their activities, see?
These individuals had best, then, be in THAT direction. Not
that there becomes more of a burden, nor red tape; but rather
that the Compiler, or Manager of Data that may be presented,
may - from those cases that may be presented to various
groups, as from reports - MAKE a WRITTEN report to be
published. Not for the PUBLIC, more than those that are
really interested or who are SEEKING to know just WHAT the
organization is doing.
Hence, as an illustration, when there is a case presented -
as Case Fifteen, there would be not only the report from the
family, the associations or connections, but from the
physician in charge, see?
Then this would be presented to such members of the Advisory
Board, INDIVIDUALLY, and have them give their comment; even
though it is only, "Well, that's fine!" Let them SAY SO, and
have it in black and white!
To this there is no GAINSAYING when questions may ever arise.
For, there will be very soon the approach of the press from
many varied angles; and many questions are going to be asked.
Then comments of such types or natures from those who are
leaders in various research organizations may be presented.
Such as may be presented respecting the Ash, as one portion
of the research activities; or the reports upon the
Batteries, or the various characters of Appliances.
THIS sort of a Board would handle such, and would be
complementary to the Trustees, to the Association, and
the ARM upon which the Manager may often lean heavily!
(Q) Lillian Young Cox.
(A) Not in sympathy to the extent to make so; though later
may be of a help.
(Q) Dr. Job Taylor. [GD's note: Ph.D. in Philosophy]
(A) The same condition exists; would be very well, but the
same condition exits. As in an ADVISORY capacity, or as a
helpfulness IN the research as associated WITH various
individuals who may help, FINE!
(Q) Myrtle Demaio.
(A) VERY good.
(Q) Helen Storey.
(A) Very good, though this would become a burden to this
body.
(Q) A. K. Swartz.
(A) VERY good.
(Q) Mae Smith.
(A) Very good.
(Q) Ruth LeNoir.
(A) Very good, though this would become a burden to the
body.
(Q) Abbie Kemp.
(A) Not wholly yet in sympathy with the whole purposes of
that being presented, or its manner.
(Q) O. J. Benthall.
(A) Be very good.
(Q) R. L. Demaio.
(A) Very good.
(Q) Edith Edmonds.
(A) Very good, though she has more activity in other
directions that are much preferable to a setting aside in
this. [She was sec'ty of A.R.E. Prayer Group.]
(Q) Claude A. Rice.
(A) Very good; though, as we find, Austin would be much
better!
(Q) Are there any other individuals who should be invited
to become members of the Board?
(A) As we find, when there is rather the perfecting of the
associations as to the activity, it would make for rather a
thinning out; yet adding to. Macsherry would be very well as
associated in these directions, as also would Fox; these ON
particular phases, as Chairman of the Research portions would
be more preferable - one in one and one in the other.
(Q) What about Bessie L. Warshawsky?
(A) This should come later with more activity among those of
her own associations and affiliations. As a representative,
WELL.
(Q) What Financial Report should the Manager present before
the Board?
(A) That which has been outlined, as to what are the needs
and necessities; and budget same.
(Q) Is there any counsel as to the coming meetings of the
Congress?
(A) None other than we have found so far.
(Q) Are there any phases of the work which should be
stressed that we are not stressing in these programs?
(A) Individual aid, STRESS! Not that you are trying to
capture the world or any portion thereof. For it is the
individual, THEN to the groups, classes and masses.
The groups stress for THEIR individual activity. Later we
will find these coming more and more as mass. But this
should never be as a mass production anywhere!
(Q) What should be the subjects for the two readings to be
given on Friday and Saturday mornings?
(A) As has been indicated; let these be selected by those
present, or by a Committee appointed for same.
(Q) What would you advise regarding the presentation of
the Cayce Foundation program before the Board in the form
contemplated by the Manager?
(A) This would necessitate something entirely different.
Let's don't mix these together! This would require a whole
presentation.
(Q) What should we do to rejuvenate our Study Group
organization program?
(A) WORK LIKE THUNDER!
(Q) Just what should we do regarding the Foundation program;
should a Committee be appointed?
(A) Be very well; Committee of the Trustees and those
affiliated associations.
(Q) What would you advise regarding the Publication program
for the coming year?
(A) We wouldn't change from that we have given. It is
necessary, if it is to live, that SOMETHING be done!
We are through for the present.
Copy to Hugh Lynn Cayce (to be put in Work Book)
Copy to Ass'n file



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation