9/29/43 Thomas Sugrue's letter to David E. Kahn re good
points in THERE IS A RIVER for a movie:
Dear Dave:-
It occurs to me that if and when you talk with movie men
(I didn't expect that to rhyme) about the Starling job, you
could ask them about THERE IS A RIVER. They may not have
heard about it, in which case I beg you to immediately act
as my agent and tell them they are overlooking a book that
is more naturally a movie story than any I have seen for a
long time.
This is not because I wrote it; I have written other books
and did not feel this way. It was something I could not
escape: as I wrote the chapters, the incidents shaped
themselves into scenes, and I got in the habit of seeing
Spencer Tracy in the role. I'm not movie-struck; I can't
attend movies, as you know, except upon rare occasions. It
is just that Edgar Cayce's life cries out for screen
treatment in every one of its aspects, and it has many
aspects.
Consider what the reviewers said - that it is an "American
Protestant miracle story." Is that not enough? Why go to
Lourdes, when the same story is here, in terms of Kentucky
farms, Texas plains, and the Atlantic tides?
Edgar Cayce's life is the story of Everyman, magnified and
projected against a backdrop of America. This is why I
thought Hollywood's readers would seize upon it as a natural.
The life of a saint or a martyr is thrilling enough in
itself, but here is a saint and a martyr who is just an
American guy, a Protestant, a married man - it is an ideal
mixture of the American success story matched with the
SPIRITUAL success stories of the saints. See what I mean?
It is a love story, too, and in all of love's manifestations
and nuances: love of a good woman, love of home and family,
love of country, love of God, love of truth, love of
integrity.
So used have I grown to seeing it in terms of a motion
picture that it is hard for me to believe that this is
not to be - not to be in our time, I mean. The Cayce story
will live, and be written and photographed a thousand times,
after we are dead.
Think of the scene when young Edgar rides in from the fields
on a horse which has never been ridden: the consternation on
the faces of the men - then, as the horse's owner mounts him
and is thrown, the fear, the suspicion, the Devil-hatred.
And the frightened boy, packing his things to go to the
town, sick at heart for his "queerness".
Think what the camera could do with a reading: as the words
of diagnosis come from the sleeping man the camera can
envision them - showing the scene of the fall from the
carriage whereby Aime Dietrich was hurt, etc. If the
scenario wants to take into account reincarnation the camera
can trace a Life Reading as it is given.
But I would think that reincarnation could be left aside and
a simple, homespun document of a man serving God in a way not
familiar to the people, could be made of this heart-breaking
story. In Hopkinsville, before the bearded doctors in
Bowling Green, in Selma, in Texas, in Dayton, at Virginia
Beach - readings are given, and the pitiful things: the
lame, the halt, the blind - see, walk, and live. Yet the
eyes of the multitude are turned away, unbelieving.
It is, you see, a great PARABLE, a great ALLEGORY, for our
times: our age of skepticism, rejecting faith, rejecting
God, rejecting miracles, rejecting His Sign.
I am reading the lives of some saints now. It is amazing how
many of them achieved their ends with the CHURCH in
opposition to them as well as the people... St. Aloysius
Gonzaga, St. Rose of Lima, St. Theresa of Avila...because
saints are always different, and call men from accustomed
ways that have become coruscated with earthiness and are no
longer holy.
Well, why should I have to pep YOU up about Cayce? But
aren't you a little bewildered that the sharp-eyed folks
in Hollywood haven't seen its possibilities?
Always, Tom
9/43 See CORONET article by Margueritte H. Bro, "Miracle Man
of Virginia Beach," in
294-1, Par. R4.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation