EC: Yes, we have the body, the enquiring mind, [
257]. This
we have had before, also those associations and those
connections, also those conditions as have arisen from the
meeting in Boston, and the various conditions - and varied
circumstances also, as are and have been brought about by
these conferences. In the conditions there have arisen some
conditions that are satisfactory, others wherein changes, as
have come in the minds of some who have been consulted -
these have made circumstances such that the whole of the
position, in a manner, seems, or apparently, is changed; yet
those conditions bringing about such change, and those
suggestions as have been made as to how such may be met, will
- were these carried out in the proper way and manner - work
to a satisfactory termination for all. In the first place,
we find a differentiation in that as was to be furnished by
bankers in capital, and in that now apparently required to
consummate deal. We find also circumstances such that there
apparently is need of more time to consummate the whole of
the plans necessary to meet the conditions as will be
required of same; yet we find with the changes as have been
suggested by the legal end - of COMBINING, not wholly as the
legal end has suggested, but combining the interests of
others that are in a position to take on the management, the
handling of, and the proper arrangements WITH the bankers and
with the peoples whom the legal representative represents
himself, only do not let such change cut in on [
257]'s
proposition. That's a warning, see? and these may be
carried to a satisfactory termination within the time,
period, as has been set. It may, with the changes in such a
set-up, be necessary for [
257] to interview Grove again, in
his present surroundings, yet were this thrashed out
thoroughly in the meeting as is contemplated being called
Tuesday, next week - or call it then - that these things may
be handled successfully. Do that.
(Q) What should [
257] demand for his part, considering the
new conditions?
(A) They should be at least in the regular channels. In
some respects more than same, for at least there should be an
understanding with [
257] and the Grove interest. There
should also be an understanding with the banking and the
legal interests, and it should total at least fifteen percent
of the cash handled, with of course the SAME amount running
with the stock as with the rest. The interests in St. Louis
need not be consulted until Grove has said his final yes, and
with their interest and Grove's interest this will have
little trouble in the handling or closing of same, when that
comes to the final handling. Then the amounts would be
something like twelve to fourteen million cash, with one
million for Grove's interest or name and good will. Don't
divide these - good will and name.
(Q) How much stock in addition to this cash?
(A) That as has first been given, so that the commensurate
income from same would be in keeping with that as has been
the income to Grove personally from same. See? that is, as
the interest shows there has been so much income, personally,
to Grove for his association. Not a good will, not a name,
not a penny invested, as far as that, the individual,
concerned, of self, except that given him - but the stock and
its dividends from same should equal something to that
amount, and that APPROACH speaks well to the body, see?
(Q) Is Grove satisfied with [
257]'s attitude?
(A) This very good, as has been given before. This very
good. The CHANGE, as is seen, is more of the business
tactics of the man himself, and not of displeasure or
distrust in any sense of [
257] or [
257]'s actions or
activities. These may be verified, not only BY that as has
been spoken as word of mouth, but of the consenting even of a
proposition with the statistics or data as concerning the
operation of the company.
(Q) Is Grove pleased with [
257]'s associates that he has
met?
(A) Not wholly. These, however, are AGREEABLE to the body
so long as the confidence as now held in [
257] insists that
these are satisfactory and mean to do right.
(Q) Should [
257] follow advice of Isaac Lande and take
proposition to Sterling Remedy Co. to handle as a
consolidation with them?
(A) Only when there is the necessity of making such a
combination for the handling of same. Or the refusal of the
bankers without such a coalition to facilitate the proper
handling. You see, here a condition is confronting the banks
and interests that, while the proposition is good and
satisfactory to investors from the standpoint of the money,
or money interests, yet such a business is only valuable
OPERATING, and to have interest such that the facilities for
handling of same is made EASIER, then clarifies much of the
situation. Not only for the Sterling but also for Wertheim
and Wertheim interests.
(Q) Will Wertheim accept the new proposition as outlined by
Grove?
(A) More that as will be outlined by Lande.
(Q) I have Grove's proposition in my hand -
(A) Well, this will be changed when Lande has gone over the
proposition, you see, and will be acceptable to Grove as a
final action.
(Q) You then advise to go through Wertheim as originally
instructed?
(A) We haven't changed from that as YET, though there have
been some conditions - See, Lande holds an upper hand, as it
were, (though he is enough high-minded not to overstep the
boundry) on Wertheim, and on the Sterling peoples, and may
make a nice combination. Just don't let Lande work [
257]
out!
(Q) You still feel that [
257] and Grove should be directors
in the new company?
(A) They should!
(Q) Should we insist, even to the point of putting the deal
in other hands?
(A) No. Not to that point. That wouldn't be necessary.
May be used as a lever, but it's too good a proposition for
Wertheim or for Sterling not to take.
(Q) How long should be given Wertheim to act finally?
(A) Not over ten days to two weeks. With all that necessary
in his hands, why should it take longer?
(Q) Will Wertheim's partner Klinkenstein be able, and have
the authority to close the deal without M. Wertheim present?
(A) He may be GIVEN the authority!
(Q) Should [
257] be present, or have the attorney Lande be
at the meeting Tuesday?
(A) Have the attorney at the meeting Tuesday.
(Q) And [
257] should not go?
(A) Why should he not go?
(Q) I believe that [
257] should go.
(A) I believe that [
257] SHOULD go!
(Q) Has Grove any other plans in mind? or is he waiting for
[
257] to handle same fully?
(A) Waiting for [
257] to handle same fully. That's sure!
at the present time. Of course, there have been many offers.
There have been many outside, and once the idea takes the
action there may grow others, but you may be very sure, not
only in this particular interest but in many others, Grove
will submit many things to [
257] that haven't been submitted
yet!
(Q) Was sufficient time asked of Mr. Grove to -
(A) Rather a short time, when so many interests are to be
concerned, yet we see no reason why this should not be
consummated by the 3rd of August.
(Q) Will Wertheim make any effort to see Grove without going
through [
257]?
(A) That's a hard thing to answer. But under the present
situation and conditions, what good would it do? Only be
raised in price, and be more to be considered, and not the
opportunity or the way in which to handle same!
(Q) Will Lande be able to carry out his plan successfully as
now set in his mind?
(A) It's very good, and we see no other reason why he
should not be able to carry these out successfully. Not only
will it enable him to work one against the other, but - as we
find it - has so set, and will so set the conditions, that
scarcely without Lande would Wertheim be able to handle it,
even with Grove - yet without the action of [
257] AND the
action WITH Grove could not be handled.
(Q) Which is best deal for [
257], for Grove to sell
outright, or as first planned - say twelve million, balance
to Grove cash, and stock?
(A) Best for [
257] sell outright.
(Q) And still remain a director?
(A) Remain a director! That's understood!
(Q) What should Lauterstein's position be, considering the
efforts he has put forth?
(A) That, as is seen, will not be wholly satisfactory to
Lauterstein in the first position in which he will occupy.
In the second or third Board meeting, after the changes,
these will come more satisfactory. Rest assured of that.
(Q) As I understand that, Lauterstein is also to be a
director.
(A) A director.
(Q) What advice should Lauterstein have for Tuesday's
meeting?
(A) Don't talk too much! and listen to Lande!
(Q) Does this same information hold for [
257]?
(A) [
257] will be asked questions in the meeting Tuesday.
Then talk, or answer that asked, and do not expand on same
TOO much, but give it fully. For [
257] represents Grove's
interests, as well as self. Grove feels same, and will
expect same. While the other interests are more
self-centered.
(Q) Should [
257] have a written -
(A) His word is good! Rather have his word than his
contract, with Grove!
(Q) What should [
257] be guided and guarded against at this
stage of negotiations?
(A) That Lande does not so set the final arrangements such
that [
257]'s interests would be jeopardized in any way! that
is, with the change of conditions, do not let these changes
take any portion from the hands of [
257], see?
(Q) Will the Forces say what the total amount for [
257]
should be, for his guidance?
(A) This is as has been outlined, at least fifteen percent.
(Q) Is that for [
257] in an undivided manner?
(A) For [
257] AND those whom [
257] has had to aid IN same,
see?
(Q) Why did Grove change his plan?
(A) As is outlined, see?
(Q) Which plan is best for GROVE, the first or second?
(A) As has been given. Not too many days for Grove, and to
be loosed from as many as possible the better condition.
(Q) Will the next meeting with Grove close the deal?
(A) It should.
(Q) When should the meeting be held with Grove, for their
conference?
(A) When the others are ready and the conditions are set for
same.
(Q) Is there any special day that would be best for these
people to get together, from a numerical standpoint?
(A) We do not find it so. Too many interests are involved
to class this numerically. For [
257] it must be with three,
of course. We are through for the present.
BACKGROUND
6/26/29 He obtained Business Rdg.
257-43 in re best manner to
close Paris Medicine deal.
7/05/29 He was present and allowed to conduct Business Rdg.
257-44, submitting further questions.
REPORTS
7/06/29 He was present for Business Rdg.
257-45 answering
questions pertaining to an Oklahoma business deal.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation