As we find, considering the situations, while they may be
placed before those that are defending - and that are active
in prosecuting the suit, these are the only channels that
would be reasonable and correct for [
257] to take in the
present. Or let Seely, rather than presenting his desires
in the matter, present those to REID and to those that
represent [
257]; for these having been set may be used
against the whole situation in opposition to the best
interests of those who have taken the conditions or the
case in presenting same.
These, as we find, would be the manners for this to be
handled. If this is to release or to make for a settlement
in such a manner, not necessary that it go through its whole
proceedings - IF presented to the proper channels; for these
are those to be taken into consideration, or have troubles
later.
(Q) Is the proposal by Olvaney, Eisner & Donnelly made in
good faith for benefit of [
257] & Seely?
(A) As we find, we would take these to their PROPER channels
- to [
257]'s attorneys, rather than considering them either
as individual activities. For these will only necessarily
make for complications, even considering whether in good
faith or whether to see what may be accomplished.
(Q) Seely is going to see Isaac Orr at the St. Louis Union
Trust Co., to ask Orr to cooperate. What suggestion should
Seely make to Orr as to the fair handling of this matter?
(A) This will be well, if it will be presented to Reid also.
(Q) Should [
257] go to St. Louis with Seely without
attorneys on either side present?
(A) If this is to be presented to Reid. This has been given
again and again. It CANNOT, for the best interests of [
257],
be settled properly without considering Reid's attitude who
is in charge. DO it!
We are through.
Copy to Self
Copy to Ass'n file
BACKGROUND
9/27/35 He obtained
257-156.
10/10/25 He submitted further questions.
REPORTS
10/11/35 He obtained
257-158.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation