(Q) Would it be better for Radio & Television, Inc., who
own Brunswick trademarks to seek outside finances and operate
entire Brunswick business from New York, eliminating [
994]
billing and collecting, but have [
994] act only as a contract
supply source for cabinets, all other matters to be handled
in N.Y. office - purchasing sets from other sources wherever
we choose them?
(A) Not necessarily, but - as has been indicated - there
may be the possibility of a combination of the [
994] Company
or organization, or other producing companies that may wish
to keep in touch with or carry on in such an activity.
Coalition of activity, then.
(Q) Who would be best organization to float stock issue?
(A) That must be chosen by those seeking to do so.
(Q) Is there any connection for [
257] to consider with
Farnsworth Co., E. A. Nichols, pres., whose offices are
at 61 B'way, and who are financed by Kuhn-Loeb & Co.,
bankers?
(A) This we do not find in the present. It may become a
part of the activity when there is the attempt or working
upon the coalition.
(Q) Is this the time to talk to Kuhn-Loeb & Co. of N.Y.
Stock Exchange on a Brunswick - [
994] consolidation or a
possible association with the Farnsworth Television & Radio
Co., which they are financing? or had we better delay this
suggestion for a later date?
(A) This would be very well to begin, though it will be
some time before it might be brought to real fruition.
(Q) When suggested, should it be Brunswick, Radio-Television
alone, or in association with some other business?
(A) May be a coalition of more than one.
(Q) Who else?
(A) These should or must be chosen, - as to whether they
are those in the position for the greater outlet with and
through the coalition made.
(Q) Should [
257] consider offer of Emerson Radio Co.,
Ben Abrams, Port Authority Bldg., 15th St. & 8th Ave.,
NYC., for the purchase of 25% of the Brunswick Co. by
Emerson?
(A) Very well if this is to be combined or used as a part
of a coalition later; if not, be very well NOT to be such
unless it becomes absolutely necessary.
(Q) Any other association recommended?
(A) These would come as the regular routine.
(Q) What will be the ultimate opportunity for merger of
Brunswick for largest financial returns?
(A) As indicated, these may come with the coalition of
furniture, radio, television and all under a larger
organization.
(Q) When should it be ready for public acceptance?
(A) When it's been PREPARED so the public MAY be able to
accept it!
(Q) Will it be by natural development through direct sales
of merchandise or by sale of stock to the public or by merger
with some other company?
(A) First by those - must be those who are able to make or
suggest or even outline such a plan for the natural source
of sales made, showing that which has the policies of the
development to that of a worth while organization.
(Q) If [
994] is not interesting in joining on proposition, -
(A) (Interrupting) As has been indicated, [
994] IS
interested, if there is the proper approach. It's NEEDED,
in fact! [See
994-3 Reports.]
(Q) Is it better to have a furniture factory or would it be
better to join a radio factory like Emerson, if a merger is
necessary for stock issues?
(A) May be both. These are very well to be kept in
connection one with the other.
(Q) Would Dumont be a better merger because of Television?
(A) Not necessary. This may become a part. But remember,
there are those patents owned by the Brunswick organization
in the various factories that will be a necessary part of
the final coalition.
(Q) Is there an English Company available with Television
patents?
(A) We do not find so in the present.
(Q) If this is not the time for a merger, or sale of stock,
when would be the best time?
(A) As just indicated, it is time to begin the work or talk
of same, and working up the plan of same.
(Q) What opportunity would Warner Bros. bring to the group
or to Brunswick for promotion opportunity?
(A) Not a very great deal.
(Q) Will [
994] Company ultimately be one with Brunswick
for financial development and best interests of all?
(A) This depends upon just HOW well, or HOW the coalitions
of this and the other organizations are brought together.
(Q) Will it be advisable to consider the two together for
stock sales or will Brunswick be able to carry along alone?
(A) Be very well and necessary for other coalitions, as
indicated.
(Q) What person at [[
994] Co.] best man to work with?
(A) As indicated, [
994].
(Q) What will be most important field for sales for 1939
on Brunswick merchandise?
(A) Review those fields of activity in the various
influences as would be the means of directing same.
This has been given heretofore. Keep in touch with that
ye have received, and when ye USE that which has been given,
ye may be given more. Do not cast your pearls before HOGS -
NOR swine!
(Q) What changes in sales policy should be made?
(A) That to meet the needs of the opening conditions in
the various fields of activity as indicated. In any field
they will work well. LEAD in the sales! In others it will
be found the competition is of such a nature that is
necessary for a broad field of activity for such
competition to be met.
(Q) What will result from contest now being run by [
1565]
among salesman (as per copy attached)?
(A) This will depend upon how much stress is made to the
various factors in same.
(Q) What type of advertising will be best for 1939 to get
largest sales and repeat business?
(A) This will depend upon how much of that which has been
indicated is necessary for the various centers through which
distribution is sought. Of course, in these it is necessary
that there be kept constantly before the consumer the
abilities, the association of not merely the name itself
but the setting of the patterns as necessary in the various
sources of distribution, see?
(Q) Would it be safe to tie our interests up with Radio
Corp. of America at Camden?
(A) Depends upon what is to be the final outcome. Be very
well, for it will be the center organization eventually.
(Q) What protection necessary to be considered?
(A) The SOURCES of supply.
(Q) Would Gen. Elec. be a good tie-up if we gave away
Brunswick records with Brunswick phonographs made by
Gen. Elec.?
(A) Not so well. As has been indicated, there is a general
coalition better needed. These are at-variance to that as
has just been given, see? All of these, then, should be
considered. Weigh them well and KNOW the sources of supply
as well as the manner or means used for creating the demand
for same.
(Q) Would we get cabinet business from G.E. as reciprocity?
(A) It might be, but as indicated it is not well that this
be part of the coalition.
(Q) Will [
257] be able to get business from Hughes of G.E.
on special cabinets this month or in April?
(A) Depends upon the manner in which they are presented.
(Q) What is necessary for [
257] to do to get the cabinet
business of G.E.?
(A) To make those in such a way and manner that they supply
the needs of that organization at the present time.
(Q) Who will be the most outstanding firm in television sets
in
1939-40?
(A) There will not be very definite standing in any, until
a year and half as yet; and then, of course, it will be
mostly through the R.C.A.
(Q) What plan of sales could Brunswick use to aid it with
equipment and have a sensational year
1939-40?
(A) This WILL DEPEND UPON THOSE THINGS AS WE HAVE INDICATED!
YOU ARE STUMBLING OVER YOURSELF HERE, in these questions!
(Q) What price range best for fine period furniture for
volume business?
(A) In the various portions of the country as HAS BEEN
GIVEN! Please review that which has been indicated as to
the price range in the various section, and the type or the
period furniture needed, - and FOLLOW those suggestions!
(Q) Please suggest detail plan of procedure for [
257] and
[
1565] to follow to lead them into the first rate position
in the nation which they are working to attain.
(A) THE PLANS HAVE BEEN SET! WORK THESE PLANS!
(Q) What added help do they need?
(A) Need more to keep the help that they have working!
and work some themselves also!
(Q) Any special talent available to aid them?
(A) Not in the immediate as we find needed.
(Q) Would it be better to use Brunswick or Victor records
as gifts and why?
(A) Are you selling Brunswick or are you selling Victor?
It answers itself! BE CONSISTENT! You know you can't use
that as a BLIND! You may give one and then the other to
show the cooperation or coordination of these, but NOT one
as a bait - for it soon plays out and works as a rebound.
(Q) In what way can Station WMCA be helpful to [
257] and
his plans?
(A) Only unless it becomes a part of a coalition.
(Q) Is it possible for [
257] to merge WMCA with any other
organization in N.Y. considering the advent of television
and Brunswick needs?
(A) This might be with a WHOLE organization as
communications.
(Q) Who would be the best man [
257] can talk to reference
to buying one-half interest in WMCA or merging it in some
way or using it with Brunswick?
(A) This would have to be a coalition of radio, television,
furniture, and all such.
And these would depend upon how much interest there may be
aroused in such groups.
(Q) What combination of organizations best to build around
Brunswick to make it a successful stock market or banking
offer.
(A) As just given.
(Q) Should [
257] now attempt again to sell Paris Medicine
Co.?
(A) It isn't his to sell! He may aid, if he so desires.
(Q) To whom, and how much will it take to buy it?
(A) This should be in keeping with those propositions that
have been made respecting same.
(Q) Any other advice?
(A) That information which has been given and suggested from
time to time is very well to keep in that way so it may be
used, and not confuse self by the various IDEAS that are
presented from time to time - unless they are worked out
together.
We are through for the present.
Copy to Self
Copy to Ass'n file
BACKGROUND
2/28/39 He obtained
257-206.
3/17/39 He submitted further questions.
REPORTS
3/22/39 He wrote EC:
"I appreciate your suggestion [for indexing?] about cutting
the Reading up into parts as we might get more. I will
follow that in the future but the reading was a very good
one and if the one thought suggested works out, it will be
as all the readings have been in the past 'very worth while'.
If I can put together a coalition of the companies you
suggest, with the experience we have had in the past I can
assure you we will have no more worries in the future. The
next time we get our hands on big money which will be the 3rd
time we will at least buy homes for ourselves and not wait
for the future. We will live more in the present. I am very
appreciative of the time that you spend on these readings
and I am hoping before long everything will be easier for
both you and myself."
3/29/39 He wrote: "[
994] is in town. I am beginning on the
merger, and all say I am crazy - except the rdg., and you
know who I will follow... The rdg. is very much to the point
and I've a lot of work to do but it gives us a lot to think
about."
3/30/39 He referred
1863-1.
5/09/39 He referred
1880-1 and
1879-1.
6/06/39 He referred
1926-1.
6/18/39 See personal message to Mr. [
257] in Congress Rdg.
262-121, Par. 21-A.
7/08/39 He referred
1584-1.
7/19/39 He referred
1963-1 and
1997-1, and
1964-1, also
1965-1.
7/22/39 He obtained
257-208.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation