8/28/35 HLC's ltr. to Mrs. [
255]: "As Dad wrote to you
recently, we would like to follow up the rdg. given for [
276]
on 7/31st. A study of the laws governing the transmission of
psychic information through Dad is most important if we are
to make the work continually more valuable to those who seek
help. If, as you point out, the rdg. missed the real
condition and described physical conditions that did not
exist there must be some cause. We are most anxious to find
the reason for this and if possible remedy the cause of the
inaccurate attunement.
"From a copy of the rdg. which is before me I note the
internal conditions described. There is little doubt that
they could have caused a skin eruption of some kind. As you
know from your long experience with the work the readings
frequently go direct to the basic cause of a condition and do
not deal with symptoms which it is useless to treat.
Naturally I believe that this is the case with [
276]'s rdg.
There are three points which need definite clarification and
upon which we will greatly appreciate your cooperation.
"Nausea is mentioned. Please check back with [
276] over the
period of her illness even to the beginning or even previous
to the actual breaking out of any skin eruption. Poisons
must be thrown off from a system. It is quite possible that
the first symptoms were nausea and temperature and later
developed, after the system adjusted itself, into the
symptoms which you mention. The temperature is the second
point to consider. This is more difficult to check, for
internal temperature may exist without external symptoms.
[
276]'s own description of her feelings would best give the
index to this, considering please both the period just prior
to any breaking out and afterwards. And as the third point
is one dealing entirely with a mental attitude it must
necessarily be considered from the standpoint of the
individual.
"I will appreciate it very much if you will ask [
276] to
assist in studying this rdg. with a view of obtaining a more
thorough understanding without regard for the personal angle.
It will be very helpful if both you and [
276] wrote us
concerning the above three points, stating definitely from
your respective angles whether or no the statements are true
in the rdg. from a point of time just previous to the actual
symptoms you describe and were treating. Upon receipt of
your letters we will take another rdg. and ask some questions
based on your reports. We will also like to know the
condition at present and if the rdg. was followed in any
part.
"It is very possible that we may obtain information of
considerable value. I have never known of a complete miss in
the case of a rdg., though many who did not understand the
work and took no time to check back carefully have for a time
made such claims as 'not accurate,' 'does not describe
symptoms', etc. Knowing of your thoroughness in such matters
and appreciating your understanding of the work, I feel that
here we may be able to find something of real value dealing
with the influences governing the transmission of the
information.
"I know that you will understand and appreciate my position
when I say that from my years of study and experience with
the rdgs. I would gladly, if necessary, stake my life on the
absolute truth of the basic conditions described in any rdg.
Therefore, I consider this a wonderful opportunity to
understand more of the laws involved in attunement with any
individual case. There are times when treatments suggested
may not bring the response expected, for the body's normal
reactions must be taken into consideration, but so far as
descriptions of conditions go I feel there is little
question.
"Both your own and [
276]'s cooperation in checking this with
us will be greatly appreciated.
"With kindest regards personally to you all, I am"
Sincerely, [HLC]
8/30/35 GD's ltr.:
My dear Mrs. [
255]:
Regarding [
276]'s Check Physical, I don't know what to say.
I notice that Hugh Lynn has written you about this, and also
Mr. Cayce. I hope you will prepare the questions and help
us try to find out just where the trouble lay. When I wrote
the reading, I had the feeling that it was a reverting to the
same gland disturbance which caused a great deal of trouble
to her once before, though perhaps with a different effect -
I believe the tonsils were affected, or throat. But glands
are such important things, and there are a million different
effects noticed at different times when they are not properly
balanced. So I feel that the osteopathic treatments to
coordinate those functionings are very important, to prevent
any future disturbance in perhaps a more serious way. But we
can check up on these things in the reading, when we hear
from you about it. I do hope that [
276]'s skin is cleared
up, and that she is feeling fine.
The Beach is getting a little quiet now, as we're having some
rainy weather and it doesn't look like we'll have many people
down over Labor Day week-end as usual.
With love to you all, and hoping it won't be long, before I
can see you and talk things over, I am
Always the same, Gladys
8/30/35 Miss [
276]'s ltr. to HLC: "I will write immediately
upon the subject of your letter.
"As to the first point I can only say that I can remember no
nausea before or during the eczema. For about
6-7 days I
thought it was a mosquito bite and therefore scratched it.
In this manner of course, I spread it. I remember several
instances before and during my skin eruption which make me
positive that my appetite and feeling for food was absolutely
normal.
"The second point is temperature. I took my temperature
immediately upon receiving the rdg. I had none. It said in
the reading (which had been given the afternoon before I
received it) that if my temperature did not go down in a few
WEEKS I should continue with manipulations, etc. Now, my
temperature was normal the day after the rdg. had taken place
without manipulations and enemas (and it continued normal).
"The third point: I was sitting on the porch in the sun on
the afternoon that the rdg. was being given. I was singing
constructive affirmation songs.
"As for resentments, I have such that exist momentarily in
the life of every person. But these pass in a moment as the
condition that caused them passes immediately. But for a big
resentment, I can easily say I have none. I believe that
everything in my life is as it should be (except for
conditions that are up to ME to change). There is nothing
that has happened or exists now which in any way could make
me unhappy. Everything I desire I have within me.
"My skin is absolutely normal again, thank you, and I hope
this experience will help you." Love, [
276]
8/30/35 Mother [
255]'s ltr. to HLC:
"When [
276]'s rdg. arrived the skin trouble was already under
control, and of course she had had the diet, so I did not
send her to Dr. Dobbins [Frank P. Dobbins, D.O.], as she
felt fine.
"On Aug. 20th she ran a low temperature, so she went to
Dr. Dobbins, but he could find nothing, her spine was fine.
We did not realize that it was a cold, which came because she
had her bed pushed in front of an open door. And as Dr.
Dobbins jokingly remarked, he would have nothing to do in
summer if people were too careful with drafts! It took a
second treatment and more cold before we realized what the
cause was. By the time [
276] had her second treatment, I
showed the rdg. to Dr. Dobbins, but he could find no
swelling, no abnormal condition in gall duct. As I said,
[
276] has been very happy, but she wrote about this herself.
Skin conditions are always an acid condition, so we were very
careful in the diet. Dobbins called her condition a case of
grippe. After her first treatment on Aug. 20th, she took the
Bismuth and Pepsin, of course having temperature only two
days. She feels quite herself again.
"But as I want to make plain once more, the rdg. took place
when she was gradually getting over her rash on July 31st.
The cold started Aug. 20th. In between she was perfectly
well. And as she wrote, she had no temperature during the
whole time of rash, that is when the rdg. so stressed it.
Eczema is important to be treated correctly from outside, so
as to prevent its spreading. I had packed the lower calves
(where it was) with olive oil during the night and during the
day we kept boracic ointment on it. The blisters were quite
large, about like a dime. So it was an important external
condition, and I think should have been answered in 'local
treatment' question.
"The whole condition was not important as a case, but I agree
with you, it is the right thing to go to the bottom of it.
It does not upset me, as I understand the wonderful power and
am glad if it just happens to me and no one else. So the
dates are important, once more: July 31st rdg. on rash, no
temperature or nausea. Aug. 20th the first tr. by Dobbins,
Aug. 26th second tr. by Dobbins. Both times temperature from
cold, but no nausea. I only mentioned this later condition,
so you have all facts. [
276] is fine now...
"Dr. Dobbins mentioned the other evening that out of forty-
six readings [of people coming to him], only one may have
been a little doubtful in its diagnosis. That gave me great
pleasure."
9/21/35 GD's ltr. to Mrs. [
255]:
"We've been rather busy with emergency rdgs. and haven't
gotten to the research rdg. on [
276]'s case. If we don't get
to it before, probably it would be very well to have it up
there [when we come to N.Y.] so you could all hear it; or had
you rather we get it before - that is, I mean would you have
any particular interest in hearing it? I'm anxious to see
what this rdg. says, as I don't remember ever having one just
like it before. And to think, of all people, it happened in
your family - where the best possible attunement existed!
But, as you say, I'm glad it DID happen to you instead of to
a stranger."
9/29/35 Mrs. [
255]'s ltr. to GD:
"As for [
276]'s research rdg., let us leave it this way. If
you have unused time while you are still home, do not
hesitate to have it. If you do not mind having it here, I
would enjoy hearing it. I just love to listen to any rdg.,
it always thrills me deeply. I am so glad to hear you are
coming to N.Y. and hope you will save a day for me to spend
in a heart to heart talk."
10/19/35 See
276-9 answering questions about rdg. 276-8.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation