3/06/33 EC's letter to Mr. [
277]:
My dear Mr. [
277]:-
More than I can tell you I appreciate your writing me as you
did in yours of the 1st. It is very hard to explain by
letter our beliefs or experiences even, with information of
this nature. We realize too, quite often, that individuals
who attempt to tell others of the readings and what may be
expected are prone to exaggerate, or to leave false
impressions; not intentionally, but from their own experience
- and it is quite impossible for one individual to convey the
full meaning of a personal experience to another.
My suggestion as to the next step for you would be similar
to that of the Psychic Research Society in their
investigation of this phenomena a few years ago. A case was
reported to the organization. It proved of such interest
that they asked one of their members to take the case and
to follow it, with the suggestions given in the reading,
irrespective or what he thought of the condition, and to
report results at the next meeting. The results in this
particular case were so satisfactory that they appointed a
committee of three (one man in Cleveland, one in Louisville,
one in Minneapolis). Each man was to obtain a reading for
a patient and follow the directions in detail himself,
whether the findings of the reading were in accord with his
own diagnosis of the case or not, and to report results.
These three men carried out instructions, and the reports
were most satisfactory in each case. [See Dr. W. H.
Ketchum's reports?]
So I would suggest that you begin with that suggested for
you, even though it may appear not to be in accord with much
that has been told you by the profession, or much that you
even feel yourself is the disturbing factor. Do that
sincerely, earnestly, persistently, consistently, for a
period of two to three weeks. Then make a list of questions
of specific nature concerning the conditions that you have
been told are causing the disturbance, or as to what you
believe is the disturbance, and submit them to a reading.
That's the only way you can prove this information to be
either helpful or one of the non-essentials.
To be sure, faith enters into anything of this nature - as
it does in most everything of ANY nature.
Now, this may not appeal to you - but I believe you should
give the information a fair trial, and come back to the same
sources to know the reason why if you do not get the results
promised.
About twenty years ago a man suffering from a trouble which
the doctors had pronounced psoriasis, had a reading. He was
told in the reading that he was merely suffering from a
disturbed digestion, and that it was only necessary for him
to eat five pears a day - three in the morning and two in
the evening, and that in thirty days the trouble would
disappear and not bother him anymore. The medical profession
- and the man himself - considered this all bosh, and there
was nothing to it at all. The man came to talk with me the
second time regarding the reading (I had known him for a
number of years). I knew he was inclined to be what we call
a good sport, a man who would bet on anything - he would even
bet it was going to rain or it wasn't going to rain. So I
put it up to him as a sporting proposition. "You want to be
fair and honest. Now you try this, and if it doesn't do what
has been promised, then I'm a liar and a cheat and you're
the honest man; but if you say there's nothing in it and
won't even give it a fair trial, who is the cheat?" He
commenced to try it out. He has been rather a consistent
booster for this work all these years.
So, I would like for you to give the information a
tryout and let me hear from you again, with questions for a
subsequent reading to check up on what has been given and
on the results obtained.
Appreciating your letter, and trusting we may be of a
service, I am
Sincerely, EC:GD


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation