4/47 A.R.E. Bulletin article by 17 yr. old [
415], entitled
GROWING UP UNDER A CAYCE READING, reported on Physical Rdgs.
415-2, 415-5 and
415-11, and continued:
But this is not just a story of my physical readings. It is
the story also of another kind of reading which Mr. Cayce
gave me called a life reading. I don't remember when this
reading was given for I was four years old. It was given
before my first physical reading. Ever since I can remember
it has been discussed at our house. First, It was read to me
and later I read and studied it myself.
It is not easy to grow up with a Cayce reading being held
over your head. I'd like to take time out and give parents
some advice on how to use them. But let me get on with my
own story.
You see, I am 18 years old now. I work in a drug store.
There are girls. The family complains of some of my
electrical gadgets but likes my photographs. The gang is in
and out of the house at all hours. It's a normal life. But
there has been time for me to study this life reading and see
just how it has worked out so far.
The part of the life reading which interested me most, as
early as I can remember, was a description of a past life in
which I was a man about whom there is some historical record.
Some of this record is good and some of it not so good. I
have figured out several ways in which I am very much like
that man, but my first excitement over being able to learn a
great deal about one of my previous lives has given way to
the realization that knowing about my past faults and
weaknesses may help me overcome some of my present problems.
The readings put it this way: "...as to the present
activity from that period, there will be a tendency for the
entity to explore into unchartered fields. Not necessarily
so much in the material things as into the mental experiences
and the activities of same."
This seems true to me, but I guess anyone my age begins to
question authority and think about new ways of doing things.
You may be interested in knowing how accurately the reading
described me. Remember that I was only four years old. Here
is the list of character traits mentioned in various places
in the reading: "temper, hardheadedness, tendency to argue
about everything, leadership, easily influenced by love
(spiritual or purely carnal)". This fits me alright,
especially "the tendency to argue" and "hardheadedness." And
I guess you could say that my election to several offices in
school and young people's activities shows some leadership.
Mr. Cayce didn't see me at the time of the reading, but even
if he had I was just four.
Probably one of the most unusual parts of my life reading was
a prediction that came true:
"Hence...13th through the 15th year...activities of the body
mentally will need to be directed wherein the later
experiences may be ruled through the influences of Mercury
rather than Mars...in the application of the mental abilities
of the entity...for with the influence in Mars and in Mercury
with Saturn having made the changes in the experience and
applications of the entity as related to mental abilities...
will make for hard experiences for those who have the care
and experiences for those who have the care and keeping."
It was that time in my life when I began to have trouble with
teachers in school and it ended up with my leaving school for
a time in my 15th year. Naturally this caused my family
considerable worry. Anger played a big part in all this
trouble.
The reading indicated that I could be a good speaker and that
this ability should be used as a lawyer or minister.
Naturally, the family is anxious for me to follow the
suggestions. I told Mr. Cayce once that I would try.
There are parts of the reading that fit me better than anyone
else knows. I have just begun to realize how strong some of
the urges can be. Being warned about them helps a great
deal. It has enabled my family to understand and help me,
and in the future it will help me meet myself.
If my language and point of view in this report sounds
strange for eighteen, remember that I have grown up under a
Cayce reading. It is a responsibility, a challenge, a great
deal to live up to - because I am just an average boy who
knows more than the boy next door about himself and what he
should accomplish.
4/05/53 Letter [from college] to his mother, Mrs. [
263],
which she gave us for the files to indicate his attitude in
re the family complaints of having had jewelry stolen, also
some of [
415]'s tools, by a boy they had befriended by
allowing him to live in the house a short time:
"Dear Mother [
263]: Another week gone and as usual I don't
have any news to tell. Just wanted to write a little note
to let you know how I feel about all this mess you people
are having. To start with I don't give a hang about the
stuff he took of mine. He wanted it that bad, he can have
it with my regards. As far as the rest of the stuff goes,
I'm kind of ashamed of you people. Detective indeed! What
kind of of an attitude is that? An 'Eye for an eye', is
that the way you people feel? Honestly, I thought you knew
better. Now forget the stuff you lost, and pray for that
boy instead of condemning him. Who are we to judge? Now
read this to [
307] and [
303], and especially [
1467].
"Be good, Honey, and see if you can help [
303] and [
307] in
their 'hour of need.' (That's a joke, all they need is a
little understanding.) Write soon. Love, Your son, [
415]."
GD's note: The following is [
415]'s philosophy class paper,
also given to us for the files by his mother, Mrs. [
263]:
St. Augustine's Conception of Evil
Antitheses - the direct opposite: hate is the antithesis of
love; evil is the antithesis of good; good and non-good - two
separate entities, this is the conception of St. Augustine.
Good as a manifestation of God. Evil as a manifestation of
Satan. God being all good as well as all knowing and all
powerful. Satan being His antithesis, all knowing, all
powerful and all evil. In the light of generally accepted
Christian dogma this is a contradiction. Even if Satan is
conceived as a symbol and not an entity, an entity as St.
Augustine did, it is still a contradiction. Augustine would
have termed this apparent contradiction an antinomies. We
can comprehend but not fully understand the mind of God, the
reason being that man's soul has been obscured by "sin", our
reasoning opaqued by evil. Evil is not natural but willful.
It is not a thing of the body but of the soul.
Let us try to reconcile these concepts of good and evil, God
and Satan. An all-good God could not tolerate evil. An all
knowing God could not ignore its existence. An all powerful
God could not be powerless at its hands. Two omnipotent
entities, antithesis of each other, could not exist. From
this standpoint it is impossible to accept God and remain
logical unless one accepts God blindly - "on faith". Of
course, using faith as a premises, one could say or believe
practically anything. Without faith, St. Augustine's views
become meaningless unless we qualify his conception of evil
and forget doctrine.
Let us look at good and evil, not as opposites but as unity,
two aspects of the same power, one negative and the other
positive. The old idea of evil being good misused.
According to St. Augustine man is evil because the original
parents sinned. The sins of the parents etc. Assuming that
good and evil are the same and that God is all good, there
must be good in sin. Adding to this, that evil begets evil
and that good reaps good how can one reconcile God and
original sin. How is it possible to blame the hardships of
the innocent on the offenses of the parents. Is it possible
that an all good God would allow such misnomers as deformed
children, the suffering of war, the strife of rampant nature?
Could a soul be made to suffer, one of the definitions of
evil, because of the indiscretions of someone else? If there
is a cause for man, if he has reason, if evil is good
misused, this is impossible. If there is a God, it is an
absurdity. How then can we reconcile sin and suffering -
evil - with God. One answer, and certainly not the only
answer, is that a soul has sinned before it is born, either
in spirit, a life other than an earthly one, or here on earth
- reincarnation.
Reincarnation explains how God, in his infinite wisdom, has
shown his mercy to us by allowing us to learn, through
experience, the meaning of good and evil. To repent but not
in a fury hell. To become as one with him. Reincarnation
discounts evil as an entity. It discounts its necessity for
existence. In such a system of experience, life after life,
evil stands for the means of attaining good. It is simply a
pathway to God, not something bad to be avoided but something
to be used to learn a lesson. It is like an endless book, we
may read it and understand it and lay it aside, we may read
it and not understand it and have to read it again, or we may
ignore it until it is forced upon us.
From this point of view evil is not evil as such but simply
incomplete good.
[Re statement above, "...until it is forced upon us."
[
415]'s Professor made the following comment: I find this
a very thoughtful treatment of the subject, Al* - and
unusually literate as well - ([
415] received an "A" on his
paper.)]
6/21/57 Mr. [
415] became a member of A.R.E. on his own,
independent of his family's membership.
8/09/58 Letter to his mother, Mrs. [
263], from Conn. where he
had gone to take a course in electronics:
"Right now I'm second in the class which isn't too bad
considering that I started three weeks late."
1/10/59 He got married. He was then a service man for a big
typewriter company.
1/27/65 Stepfather, [
1467]'s report: "[
415] is now field
engineer working in a supervisory capacity, in a big
electronics firm. He is a good Christian boy and has a fine
marriage. They have three children, a boy and two girls."
* [GD's note in re 415-1, Par. 35-A: Although his family
obeyed the warning and never called him Al, apparently his
professor did.]



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation