4/24/34 EC's letter: "I have yours of the 14th. And while I
possibly should not attempt to answer you until I have had
the opportunity to read Findlay's book, inasmuch as I am not
conscious that I have any particular philosophy perhaps I can
answer just as well without Mr. Findlay as I can with him, as
for the reasons of the faith that is within me.
"First of all, I received the check and immediately went to
see Dr. Crews. I found there was very much more of a turmoil
between the Doctor and the family than I had first supposed.
I don't know why I had felt I might be the mediator, unless
it was that Dr. Crews had been at our hospital and I had been
able to reason with her about some specific cases she had to
take care of. Yesterday afternoon I talked also a little
while with Mrs. [
267], and I suppose she will go to see Dr.
Crews today or tomorrow. Anyway, I think it is a something
that will be good for all concerned. I didn't want to be a
meddler, but only did I offer myself to be drawn into a
breach that possibly might be a help to everybody; less
expensive to you, possibly the very thing Mrs. [
267] needs,
and possibly I'll be able to get Mr. [
317] to see where he
has erred (according to Dr. Crews' viewpoint) and also the
Doctor - and I suspect she needs the work just as bad as Mrs.
[
267] needs the treatment. So, all in all, I am hoping that
everything will work out most satisfactorily.
"Now, for the rest of your letter: I wish that I might talk
with you, for I am aware that often we are not able to put
into words on paper that we really desire to pass on to our
fellow men. Of course, I know that I am not such a good
writer of letters. I realize that according to the standards
of a great many I have not had the advantages of an
education; neither am I able to express myself in words or to
phrase my sentences in such a way as to be understood at all
times. However, I am not aware that I have a creed. Neither
am I aware that I have a philosophy. And if you have been
able, from your observation of and talks with me, to know
what my philosophy is, you would do me a real favor to point
it out to me. And then I will be better able to tell you as
to whether that is my idea or ideal or not. Of this I am
sure: TRUTH is a growing thing, and what may be truth to me
today may not be truth tomorrow at all. I don't call that a
philosophy. Possibly it is. Possibly it's my lack of
comprehension to know what philosophy really is. I do know I
am not orthodox. Of course, I don't know Mr. Findlay's
approach to the subject of tearing down the traditions and
superstitions presented by Christianity and the Bible; which
has been the basis for most of our wars, most of our
contentions, and most of our faultfindings with others - and
still has been the basis for most of that people call
civilization. Many a man with a little learning, I'm sure,
becomes too large for his breeches. And the same old thing
said to one of the speakers who defended the Christ, 'Much
learning doth make thee mad.' [Acts. 26:24]
"I believe that the Christ HAS lived in the lives of possibly
all those you refer to. Surely they were moved by the spirit
of the Son of God, if their constructive work pointed to the
ONE God. I believe, too, the Christ Spirit is the Spirit of
Truth; consequently truth grows in the consciousness of
individuals AS they are capable of applying it in their
lives. Possibly, had I had the advantage of knowing what
Buddha, Mohammed, Plato or any of the rest have taught, I
might be just as willing to accept that as I do the Jewish
Bible that we have. I don't accept it without question.
Honest seeking, I believe, should be the privilege and the
right of every man. I believe that is what the man Jesus
taught. Jesus as a man and Jesus as the Christ, to me, are
two quite different things. I do believe in the immaculate
conception, and I have my personal reasons for it. As to
whether that is a fact or not, to me, does not make a great
deal of difference; and I do not find fault with any man who
does not want to accept it. But so do I believe Buddha was
not conceived in the ordinary manner, nor Melchizedek. I
know little or nothing about science. I have little idea
even of what science really PROFESSES or portends or REALLY
believes. But I am persuaded, by those that I have heard
speak who call themselves scientists, that no two of them
believe the same thing. That all the teachers in the world
have been necessary for its development, I believe is true.
Evolution of the soul, I believe; of spieces, no.
"Now, whether this is stating things as a philosophy or not,
I do not know. I am glad, though, that you have written me
as you have, [
440]. There should be a perfect understanding
between us at all times. There really is between friends.
As you say, possibly Christianity has never made anyone
understand anything and science does - but I don't believe
that. Science and religion (mind you, I don't say
Christianity) should be one and the same thing, if I
understand correctly what we see about us day by day. We are
all much like the old Hindu story of the six blind men that
went to see the elephant. ['T'was six men of Indostan' etc.,
by John Godfrey Saxe.] You know the rest of the story. They
all saw him, as we all may see a manifestation of God in the
earth; we each have our approach to Him. Most of us shut our
eyes to those things that we see about us day by day. As to
whether there have been miracles or not depends, of course,
upon the approach and as to what constitutes a miracle. If a
miracle is something that is unnatural, then there are no
miracles. If a miracle is something that I do not understand
the law that has brought it about, then to me there ARE
miracles; while to you the same might not be miracles. But
as one of the sages has said: 'There be three things which
are too wonderful for me, yea, four which I know not: The
way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock;
the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a
man with a maid.' [Pr. 30:18--23] And, as he also said,
'There be three things which disquieteth the earth: A
servant when he denieth his master; a fool when he is filled
with meat; and an odious woman when she is married.' That
the Christ Spirit giveth understanding to these things I
believe is true. For, while they may be out of the realm of
our reasoning, if we accept some of those things that
possibly have been retained by you in the rejection of the
Holy Book, they possibly explain them. I don't know just
what you have retained. But I believe the whole gospel of
the Christ, or the man Jesus - which is the gospel of the
Christ all the way through, is: 'Thou shalt love the Lord
thy God with all thine mind, thine soul and thine body, and
thy neighbor as thyself.' [Mat. 22:
37-39] THAT is my
philosophy, if I have one. All that has been added to that
has been the attempt of an individual to explain away, or
explain, just what is comprised in those few words.
"My views perhaps are limited. They are limited to my own
experience and observation. I know I cannot tell anyone how
even to pray, how to meditate. I can only say what has been
my experience, and the individual soul being a portion of the
Whole - yet individual - may gain his own comprehension by
applying same in his experience.
"If I get the right idea from your letter, and from what Mrs.
[
267] said yesterday, I am to show she and Mr. [
317] your
letter - which I am doing. I appreciate your intention to
send each of us a copy of Findlay's book, as well as the
pamphlets. I would appreciate them very much, and I assure
you they will be read with an open mind, a seeking heart,
with the desire to read that which is truth in them and let
it persuade me to be a better channel and a greater blessing
to my fellow man. I believe that our service here on earth
is to our fellow man. And it is not so much self-development
as it is selflessness - and being willing to be guided by the
spirit of God as it is revealed to us in the Christ, whether
presented by Mohammed, Jesus, Buddha, Zoroaster, Moses,
Joshua, David, [
440] or Edgar Cayce. The Spirit is One!
That which it acts upon is very different, for those souls
acted upon are individual entities; not bodies that are made
with hands, but bodies that were created by that same force
or power that has brought the worlds into being - call it
whatever we will or may - that they might be companions with
that force or power which brought them into being.
"The second coming? I don't know who, where or what ever got
the idea that it was a second coming. It may be the forty-
fifth so far as I know, of an individual or personal Christ.
As to whether He will come in this, that or the other way is
dependent upon how well those that are looking for His coming
manifest that spirit in their relationships to their fellow
man. For, still does the law apply that 'Like begets like.'
[Gen. 1:12, 24, 26.] Whether it will come through a body, I
know not. Whether it will come full-grown or be built up, I
know not. And if it is a scientist that has built it up, it
will be because the scientist has done and does do the will
of the Creator in bringing it into being - and not doing his
own will or telling God how it should be done! Because no
man can make a law; he can only find that it exists, become
aware or conscious of its being in existence as applying to
or complying or combined with other influences that he finds
already in existence. As to where the forces arrived from,
he knows not. No more than these other things that I just
quoted that we know nothing about.
"Certainly I believe that the Christ Spirit is something to
be attained by all men, and by the attaining of it we attain
that which is the purpose of the One Spirit - or One Son that
came into the earth for man's comprehension, understanding,
knowledge, or what have you. You can put all the words you
want to, and it means the one thing that has been presented
from the beginning, whether by Galileo, Newton, Darwin or
what not, whether in Atlantis, Lemuria, Egypt, Rome, or any
place - it has been the manifestation of that which is unseen
to materiality - the One Son, the one thought - God's desire
to save that which had erred; which is my belief as to what
the Son means to the earth, or as to what the Christ means to
the earth. For it is that something which makes an awareness
in souls.
"This may be a lot of hooey to you, [
440], I don't know. But
because we can't use the sources or experiences of
individuals, recorded in what is ordinarily termed the Holy
Book - or can't accept it, is no reason for us to discard it
altogether, do you think? If we do, what's to take its
place? Of course, our experiences that we may have day by
day are much more realities to us while we are in this
present vale; because we do not here become aware of anything
except by comparison. Whether we arrive at it through the
five senses or not depends upon how keen those senses are.
For, many a blind person has seen much more than had he had
his eyes wide open. Many a deaf person has heard much more
than those who were able even to hear an octave above or
below that known as our scale.
"I don't know, [
440], whether we disagree in our theories or
not. Our disagreements, if we are both sincere, should make
us think the more of each other. Yes? No? SINCERITY is the
keynote of every soul, as to whether it has a faith, a hope
or a purpose. I could never accord myself to saying I
believe this or that, for - as I said in the beginning - to
me Truth is a growing thing. Then, if Truth is the Christ
Spirit, a manifestation of God, God is also a growing thing
to our consciousness. And He must ever be. Consequently, we
see evolution in the earth of a soul. We see evolution in
the terrestrial world. Then it must be in the celestial
also. For, what we see and may be conscious of in
materiality is merely a shadow of that in the mental and
spiritual realms.
"Yes, I believe that I AM. Yes, I believe the universe
consists of mind, matter and energy, and I believe that every
phenomenon is a manifestation of - but does not necessarily
explain - mind or matter or energy. That they are
inseparable I do not believe, for energy is the mind SEEKING
to find expression - the seeking is the energy and that
expressed is the matter. Consequently, they may be
separated.
"Yes, I believe I am a focal point of matter and energy, and
it may be called electricity. I believe that I possess a
free will. I also believe it was the gift of the Creator and
not of my own making. And it is the only thing that may
separate me from becoming wholly aware of that which made me
matter, energy or mind.
"I do not know as I understand just what is meant to be
conveyed by cosmic mind, unless it is that the mind is made
up of all the experiences through which it - as a companion
of a soul - has experienced since its separation from the
first cause. Then I believe I have a cosmic mind, and it is
in a state of evolution or de-evolution, dependent upon what
I have done about that I have become conscious of - in
whatever state of experience or being I may have become aware
of my existence.
"I believe that love and faith are the primary qualifications
for attaining that awareness, and that they bring harmony -
when the will is directed to produce harmony. I do believe
that faith which is wholly blind is in mighty bad shape, but
that it may manifest through our senses - and to call them
five only is to say there are only five brotherhoods or five
approaches, and I think there are many more - even than
seven.
"I believe the destructive forces that allay our evolution
are not altogether fear or ignorance, but if we will add to
fear and ignorance SELF-WILL (or stubbornness) I think we
will have the whole situation.
"Also I believe that love and understanding are the necessary
requisites for the fulfillment of life, not only in
materiality but in the mental and the spiritual. For, as we
recognize the elements about us in the earth, air, water,
fire, and the other things that have an antipathy or an
attraction one for another, and that are so necessary for the
production of energy in any form - whether to run a little
steam engine, make a man fall in love, or what not, we find
those elements occupied - and occupied with things that have
taken form. From what? I know not! Possibly that was the
way the eagle turned in the air. Possibly it was the way the
serpent turned on the rock. Possibly it was what that poor
sister thought when the man looked at her. Is this all
foolishness or not? [Pr. 30:19]
"Yes sir, we must be able to answer always for the faith that
impels us to conduct our lives as we do, and we must not be
blaming somebody else for it either. We have a good
illustration of that in the very Book you have discarded, and
there's never been a better one.
"I believe also that all these forces are in a state of
evolution, for they are occupied by the souls that were once
with the Creative Force and are essentially a part of that
Force.
"I agree with you that through our five senses we may
perceive but a very limited portion of the universe, or be
aware of those very influences that are about us, as to
whether or not they occupy any of the realms in which
consciousness may be maintained. But it's only in their
application through the five senses that they VISIBLY affect
the material body, unless it has been purified, consecrated
or dedicated to a certain or definite service.
"I believe that the God-mind (if that is what you mean by
cosmic mind) in expression works according to law and order,
but those that are endowed with a portion of that often upset
the apple cart as would rust on a skate or a lute in the most
beautiful musical instrument, or as would an error in the
mind of the most consecrated soul!
"As to whether the purpose of science is to discover that
truth or not, I know not; for I am not a scientist. MY
purpose, if I know it, is to discover those truths and to
find how or in what manner they may be given to seekers for
their own expression of that cosmic mind in materiality.
"Whether these beliefs of mine are worthy of being presented
to others, I know not. I am willing, as you say, to present
that which I have found good in my own experience. I cannot
present anything else.
"It may be a waste of time to reason with others that are in
a lower state of evolution, but if we think more highly of
ourselves than we ought to think it certainly becomes error
in our own development. I believe if we ever approach the
awareness of the Christ Consciousness, or an understanding of
any of the laws of God, it will be on the arm of those we
have tried to help along life's pathway. Whether you
compromise yourself by attempting to teach others depends
upon how highly you think of yourself. And he that would be
exalted must abase himself, for if we would have life we must
give it. There's only one way that we can ever aid another
individual, and that is to take him where we find him; not
hope that he will climb up to where we are - if we are on a
higher level; but by stooping down, and through just
kindness, love, long-suffering, patience, lift him up to
where we are! For, if we are secure in that we have believed
and know that He is able to keep that which we have committed
unto His care by the deeds done in our conscious experiences,
then we need never be afraid. The fear of contaminating our
own selves by stooping down to one in mire is a real fear
indeed, and one that hurts AWFULLY! But to be able to save a
soul, whether he is in the so-called church of today or
wandering the streets in the muck and mire of those things
that society calls vile, to persuade him to look up and lift
up and know that He may be in Him just now - there is more
joy before the Throne of God for such an one than for all
those lovely folk that think they are justified in not ever
stooping down!
"As to what the present or future generations will do about
the attitude of the church of today, or the scientist,
depends the most upon what WE as individuals do about what WE
know of the laws of God. For, the violet that blooms unseen,
or though its odor goes on the desert air, has not lost its
reward in doing and being that which the first cause, or God,
intended it to do or be!
"No sir, I do not say you are wrong in a single thing. For,
if what you feel answers that call that is in every soul for
the manner it wishes to seek its Maker, then I say God's
blessing be with you. Cast all these things aside that you
are able to; I cannot. To disregard those who are seeking
through the denominational churches and not try to teach and
warn them as to how to apply the real truths attempted to be
presented by that One they claim to have chosen as their
guide, I cannot. I MUST try to help. That's my nature.
That's where I am in my evolution. If that doesn't answer
for you, and it isn't your experience that it is a good thing
to do, don't you do it - but don't find fault with my doing
my job, as I'm not going to find fault with you doing your
job - if you do a good job! The proof of any man's belief,
[
440], is what he does about or with it!
"Yes sir, we want to pull together always. If you are in the
boat way ahead, then you can certainly mark the way to make
it easier for those who come along next - if you are willing.
And you will always find there are souls seeking just as
sincerely as yourself to find the right way. And whether
your boat goes on the river that is named Christ Jesus,
Galileo, Krishnamurti, or what not, doesn't mean a thing to
me. If your boat runs into the stream and is evoluting, even
though it may be far ahead and out of sight already, it can
leave the way marked so plain - even as He did, my Lord and
my Master, Jesus, the hated man of Galilee! My experience,
my environs, my knowledge, haven't gotten any farther than
that. For, I have long since determined that I will know
nothing among men save Jesus, the Christ, and Him crucified!
[I Cor. 2:2]
"No sir! What you have written me is wonderful. It is
marvelous. I do not know that I have answered aright, but I
have answered as my conscience and my heart dictate. And may
God, the Father of light, of truth, and His Spirit that
shineth ever unto those that honestly and sincerely seek,
light your way and mine!
"With love from all, I am
"Always your friend," Edgar Cayce
"P.S. That the experiences which come to us when our
consciousness is laid aside do take us where we are should
be, it appears to me, evidence that it is the only way we can
help our fellow man - take him where we find him. That is
what the man Jesus did, even if many of your teachers didn't
do quite so well - but brought that which is caste and class
and self-satisfied individuals!
"I'm sure the vision must have been beautiful, and I long for
the opportunity to at some time, through your kindness, meet
your friend - [J. Krishnamurti] and, POSSIBLY, unlearn much
that has been my experience. I'm willing!" [
6/23/81 GD's
note: E.C.'s
4/24/34 letter to Mr. [
440] was excerpted
and printed in the July, 1981 A.R.E. Journal under the
title: TRUTH IS A GROWING THING.]
4/25/34 Mr. [
440] wrote for a Ck. Physical Rdg. [See
440-17
on
5/03/34] in which he stated:
"Just now, as Dad [
442] has said, it seems to me to be the
wisest thing, as far as the etheronic instrument is
concerned, to start at the bottom and learn first the
principles upon which such a machine must be constructed. In
the first place, if it is going to take an operator years to
learn to operate it [Dr. Paul E. Cold's etheronic
instrument], then he must know a lot more about it, what he
intends to undertake, than I now know. Secondly, if the
instrument has any real value it should be presented to the
world by one who knows how to explain its function in
practical, tangible, scientific terminology something which I
would be unable to do in my present state of ignorance. To
hope to have it accepted by the world, this individual should
possess the proper degrees to identify him as one capable of
discovering such a thing.
"The first thing, then, is to complete my courses in college
and, while thus obtaining much valuable knowledge, to also
obtain the desired degrees. There is no rush, you can't rush
a flower that is going to bloom. If this instrument is truly
of value it will come about anyway if not through me then
another, and as long as humanity gets it, that is the
important thing. Do you agree?"
4/26/34 He submitted further questions for his Ck. Physical
440-17.
5/01/34 Letter from [
440] to EC from Bonita, Ariz.: "Your
fine and welcome letter written on my birthday arrived
yesterday. Many thanks for what you have done for [
267] [See
267-2 Reports.] and for attempting to reconcile Dr. Crews
with her. I am sure that it is all settled by now. [
267]
writes she had a wonderful talk with you. I am glad and hope
that it has deepened the friendship between you.
"I hope I did not convey the idea that I thought you had a
fixed philosophy. In fact my letter was in no way intended
to reflect upon your beliefs but was written in response to
your advice to me to read the Bible every night if I wished
to be on the right path. All my life men have told me this,
shouted it from their pulpits, and then in turn made as sad a
mess of their lives as one could hope for. It was like
waving a red flag in front of a bull. I am sick of seeing
where following this advice has brought my fellow man, if
reading of the wars and atrocities that have been
perpetrated in its name and if being told it was the One Word
of God. That is all. I only gave expression to an inner
distaste for the person who will read the Bible and accept it
as the word of God and then call Marcus Aurelius, Plato and
them heathen idlers. I was not criticizing you in any way.
I was only presenting a picture for your examination. Had I
painted it on canvas it could not have been more impersonal.
"I am in accord with all you have expressed in your letter.
I too believe in the teachings of Jesus and bear the deepest
admiration of my life for his courage and outspoken words.
But I do not believe in being confined to his teachings. The
Bible still stands to me as a book of interest. By rejecting
it I refer to rejecting the idea that in it alone has God
spoken to man, or that it is any more helpful to a seeking
soul than thousands of other books.
"I regret that you interpret my words to mean that because a
man belongs to the Christian Church I will not help him. I
do not care what his faith is. If I can help him, I
sincerely pray that the Great Creator grant me the wisdom and
strength to do so. But if he be a Mohammedan or Buddhist, I
am just as willing to help him as I know you too would be,
and am just as willing to learn from him. Of myself, I am
nothing nor have I tried to put myself in the position of a
teacher. As the artist who feels impelled to paint his
thoughts so have I been impelled to write. If the picture
does not suit the wall of your room throw it away. My best
to all.
"Most Humbly Yours," [
440]
6/29/34 Letter to EC from Dr. B. E. Briscoe of Willcox,
Arizona: "On my arrival home, a short time ago, I found your
letter and pamphlet, awaiting me, as you suggested you would
do. I have read them through and have enjoyed reading them,
but must confess that it is beyond my imagination or
understanding, but it is not the first time in my life that I
have met with things or conditions which were a puzzle to me.
I don't suppose there will ever come a time when we will all
have a complete understanding of the different things we
encounter in this world.
"I enjoyed visiting with you very much, and I hope that some
day there may be an opportunity, whereby we might be able to
meet again.
"I spent a little bit more than eight weeks in New Orleans.
It is a very large school and many thousand patients. I got
in some very fine work, made many good connections and
acquaintances, in fact I don't think I ever had a better time
in my life in every way. While there I made arrangements to
go as a ship physician on a cruiser to Central and South
America. Nothing preventing, I will go some time in August.
Of course I am looking forward to the many good people that
I am going to meet on this cruise, and the valuable
information that I might gain, in addition to the sightseeing
part of it.
"Assuring you again that I was very glad to hear from you,
and with very kindest regards and best wishes, I am,
"Yours very truly,"
7/07/34 EC's letter to Dr. B. E. Briscoe, Willcox, Arizona:
"I was indeed very glad to have yours of the 29th. I
realize that you were quite busy and no doubt your stay and
course at the university did require longer than you at first
anticipated, for I am sure when anyone gives of themselves
unselfishly to a service for their fellow man little thought
is taken as to time or to the outcome save as for others.
"Am happy to know that you had such a wonderful session. I
am sure you enjoyed many experiences that were very much
worth while, and they will prove most valuable to you in the
days and years to come in a service to your fellows.
"The idea of your being able to have a Central and South
American cruise is certainly most wonderful, and I am in
hopes that it all works out just as you anticipate, and I am
sure that the associations and contacts in the whole
experience will be quite a valuable asset, not only in adding
to your material pleasure at this time, but in making for
associations and contacts that will be valuable to you in
many ways. I rather envy your experience. Wish that it
might be possible for me to join you in such an excursion.
"We have just closed our third Annual Congress. This is a
'get together' meeting of our Active Members and friends
throughout the country who can find the time and who feel it
will be valuable to them to come in closer contact with the
sources and channels of information through which this work
has come. We had quite a nice meeting this time, the largest
in attendance and the most enthusiastic group that we have
had thus far. Quite a number of people were present who have
been in touch with and who have received benefits from the
information, who have known of the work for years, who have
not had the privilege of meeting us in person before. We
had people from Michigan, New York, Long Island, Georgia,
Alabama, Ohio, Kentucky, Washington, D.C. and of course quite
a number from Virginia and North Carolina and some other
places. We had quite a number of reports from physicians who
had cases under their observation, cases that had baffled the
profession in many instances. In fact, as I said to you and
I think as it should be, very seldom does the individual
approach these channels for information until they have tried
everything else. Not that this is to take the place of the
medical profession - it can't be done. It is only the
medical profession who can sign a birth certificate or a
death certificate, either, yet there are many of these who
make a blunder.
"However, if you would like to see these reports when we get
settled down again I would like to send them to you, if you
would like to see them.
"It would be very hard for me to tell you just how close and
how much Mr. Little, your uncle and your wife's uncle, meant
to me, for in our earliest days he was one of our best
friends. He was himself his own worst enemy at times, but
indeed a very remarkable and wonderful man, and after all of
these years to come in contact, even though for just a moment
or a few minutes, with some of his people, it seems to me
something has guided these circumstances that would be hard
for us as sane people to even put our finger on.
"I know that you are too busy a man to carry on a
correspondence, but I will be glad to hear from you, and I am
just hoping and trusting that we may find something of vital
interest and sympathy between us that we may keep closer in
touch with each other.
"With all good wishes to you and yours, I am..."
9/25/34 Letter from [
440] to EC: "The past month has been a
most hectic one and finds me today settled in Harvard ready
to begin classes tomorrow...
"At present electrical engineering is the goal and nothing
else must be allowed to interfere. Psychic phenomena
interests me so much that if I also played around with it, it
would have a serious distracting influence."
10/08/34 "I can honestly say that there is no one in my life,
with the exception of my mother, who has helped me to
understand better the possibilities that this life may hold,
than you. You may find that hard to believe, yet through
your readings I have found inspiration for the future and
confidence in what I am doing in the present. I question the
rdgs., of course, as any intelligent person would do, but you
must realize that any criticism or suggestion that I should
offer for the work is prompted by my sincere interest in
psychic research and my belief that you have the opportunity
and the ability to be one of its pioneers... [He requested
Ck. Physical 440-19.]
"If you have time to also ask about the feasibility of an
expedition next summer to discover definite proof of the
existence of the continent of Atlantis, it might prove most
interesting."
11/02/34 EC wrote him about forthcoming rdg. demonstrations
before the Psychology Dept. heads at Univ. of Pa.
[See
758-38 and
727-1,
11/11/34.]
12/08/34 Card: "I just read over one of your old letters in
which you ask my idea of a tangible demonstration. Such a
demonstration would be the discovery or invention of an
instrument which would prove the nature of psychic laws at
which we only guess at present. Do you think we can do it?
That will be the test."
1/04/35 EC referred him to
5735-1 on
3/27/28 in re machine on
which communications might be rec'd from psychic sources.
1/10/35 "I shall return to college in a couple of wks. to
try and complete the 2nd half of the yr... I will have the
Harvard laboratories at my disposal for research work in a
yr. or so if I am successful in getting my Master's degree."
[
7/19/35 See 440-20.]
8/06/73 GD's note to Drs. Gladys & Wm. McGarey, Phoenix, AZ:
"At last I have found the name of the ranch where EC stayed
with Mr. [
440] in 3/34. It was SEVENTY-SIX RANCH, BONITA,
AZ, in the next county from Casa Grande, but I'm sure EC and
Mr. [
440] drove all over that territory while there. Notice
attached correspondence [440-11] mentioning prominently some
of the people they met while there. Will you tell the lady
who spoke out at our lecture, who said there was no dude
ranch in Casa Grande in 1934? I didn't mean to be
misleading, but I felt sure it was in that area of Casa
Grande where you are now planning the A.R.E. Clinic."
See Source File Key #440 for A.R.E. Journal excerpt from Dr.
John H. Sutton's article THE TUAOI STONE - An Enigma, in re
Thomas Jefferson See, referred to in 440-11, Par. 28-A.
7/14/75 Robert J. Jeffries ltr. to Hugh Lynn Cayce:
Dear Hugh Lynn,
My research interests lead me down many interesting (and
often blind) alleys. Recently I came across something to
which you (or Gladys) may be able to relate.
The reputed situation:
1. There was a man, Mr. "X" (see attached reported data) who
did some outstanding theoretical and experimental work toward
an understanding of some "psychical phenomena", and in
particular, with respect to the existence and nature of an
all-pervasive "ether".
2. Mr. "X"'s name, was given specifically (it is reported)
and his theories endorsed by Edgar Cayce, and further (it is
reported) Cayce said that the works of this scientist would
be fundamental to an understanding of "ether" and
gravitation.
3. It is further claimed that the Cayce reading which
specifically endorsed Dr. "X", by name, is missing from the
A.R.E. Library.
4. It is reported that some NASA scientist has written
something for A.R.E. regarding energy forces in Atlantis, in
which he requests readers to supply any available information
with regard to copies of the works of Dr. "X".
I would be interested in:
a. the name of Dr. "X"
b. gaining access to any of his "works"
c. the name of the NASA scientist and seeing a copy of
whatever he wrote.
Obviously I am concerned with anything that is being written
or said which links Edgar Cayce to non-medical research, and
particularly, everything that the A.R.E. is publishing which
directly or indirectly gives credence to "far-out" ideas.
Is there anything you can tell me about any of this?
Cordially,
Robert J. Jeffries
REPORTED DATA ON MR. "X"
1. Biography listed in Encyclopedia Americana.
2. Born 1866, Mobile, Missouri; died 1962 Oakland, Calif.
3. Graduate, University of St. Louis (mathematics/physics)
Ph.D. University of Berlin, Germany.
4. 1902 joined U.S. Navy as astronomer and teacher of
mathematics.
5. Published many articles in German "Astronomishe
Nachrichten."
6. Retired from Navy 1931.
7. In WHO'S WHO - American Men of Science.
7/18/75 Gail Cayce's reply to Dr. Jeffries:
Dear Dr. Jeffries:
Hugh Lynn sent your letter of
7/14/75 to the E.C.F. to answer
regarding Mr. "X". Yes, there was a man, Thomas Jefferson
Jackson See, who did theoretical and experimental work
regarding ether. His name was not given by Edgar Cayce but
by Mr. [
440] in his reading 440-11, Question and Answer 28
asking about his works regarding etheronic energy - and in
his answer Edgar Cayce endorsed the man T. J. J. See. The
reading is not missing from the library. It can be found
under 440-11.
A NASA scientist, Dr. John H. Sutton, Ph.D., wrote an article
for the Jan. 1974 A.R.E. Journal entitled "The Tuaoi Stone"
using Dr. T. J. J. See's information and requesting further
information from anyone regarding his previous works.
We are enclosing a copy of our A.R.E. member C. B. Wynniatt's
letter of
6/10/75, from 25 Commins Road, Onerahi, Whangarei,
New Zealand, saying that he now has all of T. J. J. See's
relevant works, which he lists.
Let us know if you contact C. B. Wynniatt in New Zealand
regarding See's works. Perhaps our Library could get a copy
of some of them.
Sincerely,
J. Gail Cayce
6/10/75 Letter from C. B. Wynniatt, 25 Commins Road,
Onerahi, Whangarei, New Zealand:
"I think that you should also make a note of the fact that T.
J. J. See's relevant works, all of which I now have, are:
ELECTRODYNAMIC WAVE-THEORY OF PHYSICAL FORCES, vol. 1, 1917;
and vol. 2 (NEW THEORY OF THE ETHER), 1922. The 1922 volume
is a reprint of 7 papers originally published between 1920
and 1922 in the German astronomical journal, ASTRONOMISCHE
NACHRICHTEN.
"8th MEMOIR ON THE NEW THEORY OF THE ETHER, ASTRONOMISCHE
NACHRICHTEN, February, 1926. A supplement to the 1922
volume, in which it was not included.
"WAVE THEORY, published in 12 Books, constituting 14 bound
volumes (Books 9 and 11 in two parts each), between 1938 and
1954.
"The publishers in all cases were Wheldon & Wesley (England)
and Thos. P. Nichols (U.S.A.) (now defunct). They run to a
total of about 4000 pages, and are so voluminous because they
include a lot of historical and biographical material, and,
in the case of the 1938 to 1954 volumes, because they were
reproduced from double-spaced typewriting, not typeset. They
were printed at See's own expense, this being necessary
because his theories were directly contrary to the relativity
theories of Einstein."



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation