(Q) Did I have anything to do with the building of the
pyramids and the records therein?
(A) In preparation of records, not of building but the
preparations of records. As oft indicated, in such records
there are many of those things that to mankind in the present
would be considered as priceless. For instance, this was a
part of the entity's records:
As to the ideal association of individuals - as man and woman
- for the ideal establishing of homes; that is, the physical
likes and dislikes, the mental capacities of each, the
physical abilities of each as related to a correlating or
paralleling of purposes. As may be indicated in these, which
will be found to be almost as irrefutable laws:
There CANNOT be a congeniality where the ideal and purpose of
sex life is not of one and the same purpose.
There CANNOT be a congenial home builded where the desires of
the spiritual are not at least in unison in the worship of
the same SPIRITUAL ideal.
These were part of the entity's contribution to home life.
(Q) Where and how was I associated with my sister, [...]?
(A) Not in the Egyptian experience, but rather in the
Persian.
(Q) Arthur [...]?
(A) He was the individual counsellor you had so much trouble
with in Egypt! He's trying to make it up now!
(Q) [
4919]? Why am I the mediator in this life between him
and [
1935]?
(A) In Egypt this entity was then thy problem, and is a
sorehead in the present!
(Q) [
2898]?
(A) In the Egyptian experience among those that worked in
those same activities, though there were differences of
opinions, in the home building in Egypt.
(Q) Dora [...]?
(A) We don't find Dora.
(Q) [
2960]? and what is the effect of that association on
our relationship in this life?
(A) In that experience you were closely associated, as was
the entity [
2960] to the Priest and those activities there.
Differences in these have grown from other experiences, but
there is a bond of sympathy, a bond of understanding. Don't
lose it - for they'll ALL need it!
(Q) [
5373]?
(A) We do not find it in the Egyptian experience. There is
an association, but we do not find the association here.
[
7/22/44 See
5373-1, Par. 35-A indicating an association in
the Egyptian period of Moses.]
(Q) Elsa [...]?
(A) Another not associated in Egypt, but in some other
association.
(Q) Ruth [...]?
(A) Here a close association. Differences - ye find ye are
still trotting them out, as to the variations in relation-
ships with individuals.
(Q) Elva [...]?
(A) One the entity knew of, and can wrap around the finger
if you want to - but you don't very often want to!
(Q) Beulah [...]?
(A) We don't find Beulah.
(Q) Any other advice?
(A) Do not take the counsel indicated here too lightly, - do
not take it too seriously, but take it rather as that which
should be a LIVING thing - to be still a helpful experience
in the lives of those with whom the entity comes in contact
day by day. For, as indicated in that given, the entity
consciously and unconsciously CAN control people! Do so NOT
to thine own nor their undoing, but to the glory of God.
We are through for the present.
Two copies to Self
Copy to Ass'n file
BACKGROUND
See
808-18 on
7/20/42.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation