3/26/31 [
849] letter to EC:
Dear Mr. Cayce:-
This letter probably will not reach you before the meeting,
but since its contents will have to do primarily with my own
relations to the work that does not matter. I shall
anxiously await the outcome of Saturday's meeting, and hope
and pray that it is successful.
I appreciate your understanding and sympathy in the matter
of the religious matter. There seems, however, to be a
misunderstanding on both sides. Leaving my family aside for
the moment let me take the attitude of [
1102]. Despite my
many attempts to explain otherwise she has an idea - which
she does not express - that the work had a lot to do with my
revolt from catholicism. On the other hand you in your
letter led me to believe that you suspect something of the
same sort. As a matter of plain fact I have been a rebel of
the catholic church since I was five years old. They had to
tow me to first communion and confirmation, both of which I
received when several years past the natural age. From then
until I quit altogether it was like pulling teeth to get me
to go to communion and observe such things as holydays and
fast days. Why? Because I instinctively pulled away from
ceremony, dogma, and doctrines I felt were true but rather
twisted to suit material purposes. Finally, in college,
during my freshman year I looked the thing squarely in the
face and dropped it altogether. All this, understand, before
I even heard of your work! The work has given me back
religion, but in an altered and acceptable form. I frankly
say that when I first came to Va. Beach I was an unbeliever
in anything. I had to be shown, and I was. Consider then,
that had I not contacted the work I would to-day be one of
the class of people who are inclined to dispute the divinity
of Christ, the authenticity of the Bible, and the usefulness
of christianity. So instead of taking me away from religion
you brought me back to it. Therefore I have not a qualm IN
MY OWN MIND about what to do. Consider me in on everything.
However, I believe in handling all matters as diplomatically
as possible. [
1102] will not be satisfied until I fully
re-embrace the Catholic faith. The only way there is even
a possibility of that is through my association with the
work. For that is all the religion I have. Now, I believe
I am right in supposing [
1102]'s thought is governed by one
principle - that the Catholic Church is indisputably right
in everything is says and does. Now you see the job. In a
week at Va. Beach I am able to definitely sway the fifteen
years of Catholic schooling, but then she is taken back to it
again and deliberately closes her mind and says "it is not so
or right because the Catholic dogma says otherwise." The
obvious thing to do is wait until she has been away from the
teaching of that long enough to allow a rational thought to
receive at least entertainment in her mind. Meanwhile all I
can do is sit tight and continue in my belief and work. I'm
quite sure that once she contacts the work for a sufficient
length of time she will see the childishness of her attitude,
but for the present it is an uncomfortable situation.
Still, for the sake of comfort one cannot do what one knows
is wrong. For me the only right, desirable, and just thing
to do is associate myself with the work as soon as I am
invited, in the capacity which the readings indicate, and
allow time and God to do the rest. I'm sure everything will
turn out all right.
The reading indicates that I must first find credence for
it in my own life. The first step toward finding that
credence is to go to the work and look for it. Since last
September I have had a lot of time to think and meditate.
I think you will find me an almost different person now. I
am quite rested, healthy, calm, and founded solidly in my
thought. I'm still searching for the fundamental basis of
my life, but it is at least closer now than ever before.
Whatever else I may be I am primarily an adventurer, a rebel
against circumstance, order, environment, even fate. In the
life of every adventurer, there is a moment when he seems
headed for eternal oblivion, mediocrity. All his hoping and
scheming and planning and dreaming seem lost in the cruelty
of circumstance. But the dreams and work of the past are
always piling up behind him, and even though he be tired and
want mediocrity and oblivion, it is then that he cannot have
it. For the implacable tide of his past rolls on against him
and he is swirled into the vortex of his destiny. Always it
is some slight accident, meeting, circumstance, which starts
the irresistible tide. For the past seven months I have been
headed for that mediocrity, that oblivion. But even now,
when the scene is most hopeless, I can feel the black hordes
of the past gathering on the hillside, wheeling their horses
for the charge. Something will happen, then the thunderbolt
will be loosed, and the parabolic trajectory of my life will
be flung across the red sky of history. And this time I will
ride the crest of the wave, until it breaks on the beach of
death or scatters to foam and bubbles on a sand-bar of
despair.
Slowly, implacably I have seen fate forging the bonds of
steel that bind me to your work, that hold me to it as the
thrall to his liege-lord. I may not break away, not want to.
From there I shall fling my small, strong cries to the sky,
steadily, and with augmenting voice - and they shall hear me,
all of them.
It is not a hard decision to make. I merely shrug my
shoulders and say to myself that it has always been thus.
And to you I say, when shall I come? I believe in the work,
in you and the faithful who surround, and in myself. What
more is necessary, when the living God is with us?
The reading [
254-55] was beautiful, inspiring. My questions
were well answered, as, I think, were those of Hugh Lynn,
Gray, and the minister. With readings like that I cannot
understand how there can be dissension.
I believe with the reading that "the day is at hand." I am
young and strong - I will work.
Again regarding my religious attitude - I have done a great
deal of studying and thinking in that direction. I am
convinced that my positions in the past as priest and monk
have given me this view of God as I have it to-day -
despensing with all outward form and worship and meeting Him
face to face. Do you see why? Well, it doesn't matter,
these things, with all other troubles, will pass away in the
glory of His work and the success of our labors.
May God take me for what I am, a soldier of peace in His
name. I do not come as the fawning worshipper, the
incense-burning charlatan, the pious hypocrite, but as the
lusty liver of life, His healthy child, with the weapons He
has given me, ready to defend He who is my Father.
Success to all of us, my love to everyone - and please let
me hear the results as soon as possible.
[
849]
4/14/31 [
849]'s letter to EC:
My dear Mr. Cayce:-
We live, we lust, we love awhile, and lie.
We damn, we dessicate, and then we die.
That's an extremely hopeless outlook, isn't it? However,
I think it expresses the normal development and decline of
the average person. I also think it is the evil toward which
our work must lend its effort. The expressed ideal of the
new organization is directly opposed to this habit of living,
and in my own personal self it has ever been the desire, the
ideal, to live in exact refutation to this colorless formal,
and strive to the end that other may also avoid this pitfall
of medicocrity. Most people live and die without discovering
themselves. I take it that we wish to help them to this
finding. If such is the case then the ideal of the work is
exactly as I have visioned it should be, and it is one with
my own ideal. Through my work as a literary artists I hope
to aid this work, and in the various aims set forth in the
paper I have received every other possible angle is provided
for. I am extremely pleased with the results of the first
meeting, endorse them heartily, and wish to offer myself in
any capacity that they may be realized. [See
254-55 Reports
and 254-56.] [
4/01/31 EC's ltr. see under
4905-70 Reports.]
You have asked for constructive criticism and I feel free to
give it. Only two points strike me just now. One is that
the department of history and archeology should be emphasized
from the start - there has always been a tendency to leave
this to the misty future. We never know when the opportunity
will arise to make a first attempt to concretely prove the
work, and we should therefore be ready for it. By that I
mean one man, perhaps while working in another department,
should spend some time gathering the history, both social,
political, and religious, of the world - in some sort of
orderly manner, and in the same way to obtain a chronological
record of the revelations given in the readings with regard
to these histories. When the chance comes we should have all
plans nearly ready for an Egyptian expedition, and others to
such places as the western portion of the U.S., Bimini, and
England.
My other point concerns A. B., and possibly C. of the
PHYSIC RESEARCH. The feeling here is personal; that is I
were to undertake the C of II I would like to have A. B. and
C. of III included for the moment in my work, for I feel
there would be time for it, and also it would be in the
natural line of that department's work. It is essentially
vital and immediately important that we be able to stand on
our feet for any query or investigation, and these points
can make us capable of that.
With regard to the questions of manager, I agree with your
opinion that a General Manager should supervise the personal
managers. For that general post I know of no more capable
person than Lynn, because of his wide knowledge of the work,
his intimate connections with it, and his education which
fits him for it. With regard to budgets, expenditures, and
the financial management I see no reason for not according
such a man as Shroyer this job. I do not know the other man
mentioned, so cannot give an opinion on him.
The name suggested needs, I think, only a bit of
specification, such as the word "American" before it. It
contains the ideal, and is sufficiently practical,
scientific, and sentient to satisfy all peoples.
You know, without asking, that you have my support. As to a
time for the meeting I cannot offer a suggestion, since it
will be unfortunately impossible for me to be there. But I
also want it as soon as is reasonably possible, because I
dare to hope that the sooner it is held the sooner the work
will begin, and therefore the sooner I will be back at the
beach and "in harness" again.
Thank you for the copy of the meeting's findings and your
friendly letter. I am sure success is imminent, and you can
count on me for all the support and help I am capable of.
I trust you are all in good health, and cheerful for the
future. Give my love to everyone, and my best wishes for
all success.
Love, [
849]
4/21/31 EC's letter to [
849]:
Dear [
849]:-
Ever since I received your letter the day of the meeting,
I have tried to find the time to write you - and I hope this
delay hasn't created the impression in your mind of any
unappreciativeness on my part of you position, or of the
beautiful thoughts, ideas and ideals you expressed in your
letter at that time - also in the one of the 14th.
Circumstances, as well as the information itself, has
seemingly made us go very slow with the crystallizing of the
purposes and aims into a workable thing. To a great extent,
Dave Kahn - as chairman of the first meeting - is looked to
by a great number of people as something of the leader; that
is, through his ability to at least interest a group from
whom a greater part of the initial contributions might come.
Not that the work is going to be dependent upon any
individual, or individual group, except those who are
attempting to be of service - and in that service, if the
information is to be relied upon, will come the means for
carrying on every department of the work itself. This, to be
sure, will make slow progress - but it will at least be on a
firm basis. The foundation, in other words, will be in the
work itself. That, and that which may be accomplished by the
individuals giving or lending themselves to the work - and
each department should be able to stand on its own feet after
getting some little impetus from those interested in that
particular phase. I think now that the organization meeting
will be sometime the early part of June, unless there is some
movement by the old crowd that I know nothing about that
would prevent it.
I am pretty well in accord with your suggestions in the
letter of the 14th, and believe these departments should be
looked after very much in the way you have outlined. As
soon as we have the meeting and make final decisions, we will
want to get the various departmental heads together with the
managers or directors (whatever they are to be called) and
then work with the business manager. It seems now that there
will have to be two business managers - one the financial
business manager and the other what may be termed more of a
personal business manager, or one that will confine his
efforts to the contacts - and who would be closely associated
with all those who are distributing or editing any data for
the membership, or for the laity.
I will try to keep you posted of any progress made. The
local people - Norfolk and vicinity - have had a few meetings
recently. They are forming a study group; not, not such as
Mr. Blumenthal carried on from a text book of the 4th
dimension, but rather getting the background from the writers
of the past who have directly or indirectly delved into, or
made reference to, such phenomena in its various phases.
This should enable each group to get a real background for
whatever may be presented in the information or data
gathered, enabling them to make a comparison that would be
worth while.
We are continuing to have considerable interest manifested in
the talks from Sunday to Sunday. We have had two in
succession lately - that is, last Sunday and the Sunday
before - owing to the fact that next Sunday will be Cape
Henry Day.
Let us hear from you. Nothing particularly new. Of course,
we are keeping rather on the anxious seat as to know what
Dr. Blumenthal's attitude is to be about the home in which we
live - as we haven't been able to get any expression from
him. It would put us in rather a bad shape if we had to move
any time soon.
All send love.
Ever the same, EC:GD
8/03/31 He obtained a Ck. Life on his literary efforts, also
on the publications in re the EC work - see
849-9.
See subsequent Physical Readings, etc., with succeeding
correspondence pertinent to his life and work.
11/06/39 See friend's rdg.
2037-1, Par. 45, indicating her
relationship to [
849] in England and that she was his
companion in Egypt.
11/16/39 He obtained
849-45, a Ck. Life on his Egyptian
incarnation.
3/16/40 He referred Mr. [
2147] for a Life Rdg.
3/28/40 See
1857-2, Par. 44-A, 45-A in re their past
associations.
8/13/40 He referred Mr. [
2322] for readings.
9/10/40 See wife's rdg.
1102-5 indicating their karmic
tie-up in re' home and marriage, necessity to work out things
together instead of becoming estranged.
10/09/42 See Miss [
1981]'s Ck. Life Reading
1981-2, Par. 18-A,
indicating she she had been associated constructively during
their Egyptian sojourn but in her early American sojourn,
during the time of Napoleon's fall, there had been the
acquaintanceship with [
849] but not to good purpose.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation