7/09/25 EC's letter: Yours received yesterday, and as you
will see, the first reading [See
900-91] was taken and we
tried to get this as full as possible. However, as you will
see, "We are through" was given before the questions could be
asked on the last part. Should you feel that it is necessary
that these be carried further, you know we shall be glad to
do so, but apparently to me, it seems you have a great many
of your questions answered in the reading just given that
passed this one on the road, or in other words you get the
dreams and the answers to same in the following dream. I'm
quite anxious to take the other one though, to see just what
it meant by the word "nefarious."
As regarding the book by Confucius, I am of the opinion that
you gathered the wrong impression from this, as I understand
this did not mean Cato the writer, nor Plato, but just as we
would say the second chapter in Confucius' writing, for as
you will see, Cato means second down, or Cato second means
second down.* You should be able to obtain a book by
* [See note at bottom of Page 2.]
Confucius from one of these publishers as given, or
bookseller. We'll be glad though to take this further if
you think it's necessary.
I have thought quite often of trying to take a reading on
Evolution but it seems we've had so much of it in the book
[See [
3744] series and [
900]'s questions on it.] and in the
various dissertations, I suppose you might call 'em, we have
had from time to time on various subjects touching on this.
I didn't know whether it was worth while or not. I certainly
had a very wonderful dream myself last night regarding same.
Apparently in that I was giving a very free full lecture to a
group of super-men (who, all but one, had passed into the
Beyond. I'm not sure about that one individual to whom I was
talking.). If I could just remember that speech I was
making, I'd have a wonderful talk on same, for many of the
people that I was talking with were evolution-ists, including
Darwin himself, Huxley, Vance, Plato and Socrates. So you
may know I had quite a learned audience and more than one
side of the question presented. I'm in hopes, however, that
when we do get this we'll have something written in a form
that will at least be readable, and we'll get to it just as
soon as possible. [Subsequent dream rdgs. delayed EC's
attempting the Evolution rdg.]
7/30/25 EC's letter: "I'm more anxious now all the time
[after sending [
900] his rdg.
900-100 answering questions
about Jesus, etc.] to get hold of the other one - Evolution,
but I want to take that when I'm feeling real good and rested
and I hope that we'll have something worth while. A day or
two ago we took one on a dream that I had. I'm enclosing a
copy of same [294-34]." [
8/03/25 Mr. [
900] submitted
questions for
294-37, expanding on 294-34.]
6/20/75 With reference to TERTIUM ORGANUM it is interesting
to note that G. I. Gurdjieff told his student P. D.
Ouspensky:
"Yes," said G. "A great deal can be found by reading. For
instance, take yourself: you might already know a great deal
if you KNEW HOW TO READ. I mean that, if you UNDERSTOOD
everything you have read in your life, you would already know
what you are looking for now. If you understood everything
you have written in your own book, what is it called?" - he
* [Cata-, cat-, cath-, [Gr. kata, kat- (before vowels)
(before aspirates), fr. kata down.] A prefix in words of
Greek origin (sometimes coming through Latin) and in
compounds formed on Greek analogies. It denotes down,
downward, away, in accordance with, against, very,
completely, but in English its separate force is often not
felt.]
made something altogether impossible out of the words
"Tertium Organum" - "I should come and bow down to you and
beg you to teach me. But YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND either what
you read or what you write. You do not even understand what
the word 'understand' means. Yet understanding is essential,
and reading can be useful only if you understand what you
read. But, of course, no book can give real preparation. So
it is impossible to say which is better. What a man knows
WELL" (he emphasized the word "well") - "that is his
preparation. If a man knows how to make coffee well or how
to make boots well, then it is already possible to talk to
him. The trouble is that nobody knows anything well.
Everything is known just anyhow, superficially."
Source: IN SEARCH OF THE MIRACULOUS, P. D. Ouspensky, Page
20. [Could TERTIUM ORGANUM have come from knowledge gained
in Tibetan incarnation?]
INDEX TO OCCULT SCIENCES, Doubleday and Company,
Copyright Aldus Books Limited, London, page 48:
OUSPENSKY, PETER DEMIANOVITCH (1878-1947)
Leading occultist often described as a disciple of Gurdjieff.
Ouspensky was a Russian writer and lecturer who had been
trained as a scientist. But he had become dissatisfied with
modern values and plunged into a study of the occult,
traveling extensively in the East. In 1915 Ouspensky met
Gurdjieff and became one of his closest associates. Even
after their break in 1924 because of a clash of
personalities, Ouspensky continued to devote his life to
teaching and expounding a system of thought like Gurdjieff's.
From 1924 to 1940 he lived in London, and his lectures and
study groups were attended by many well-known people. At the
outbreak of World War II Ouspensky moved to New York where he
continued writing and teaching. He returned to England in
1947 and died there the same year. In his IN SEARCH OF THE
MIRACULOUS, he gives a detailed account of his years with
Gurdjieff and of Gurdjieff's ideas. Other important books
were TERTIUM ORGANUM, A NEW MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE, THE FOURTH
WAY, and THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MAN'S POSSIBLE EVOLUTION.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation