(Q) Thinking this meant Chrysler down to 42, as I was
reading the reading sent me at the time, I phoned [
137] to
floor to sell some Chrysler and buy it back cheaper. The
message was delivered to [
137], but lo and behold he
understood it to be Fleischman, of which he had just bought
1000 shares. It influenced him to sell the Fleishman and of
course not sell Chrysler, and after that Fleishman went down
and Chrysler up. Thus in spite of his purchase, and my
advice, both of which were wrong, (in light of subsequent
market activity), we did the right thing and profited. Was
this event, that happened April 14, 1927, a pure accident, or
otherwise influenced?
(A) The combination of those influences in the action of the
concerted force of each, see? Now, we get this so that the
entity may understand same as it is meant to be: When the
entity receives such information, action is taken, see? When
the information is received by one to whom the entity should
give, and who should act on same, it (the entity) acts too,
and the action brings that error in both to success, for both
choose to act without stopping to hem, haw, or draw lines or
conclusions - for, as has been given, when one knows to do
and DOES, even though it may be in error, the action brings
about the activities of it, itself, that which brings the
better conditions for each, see? Not an accident. Purely
the activity of forces which may be gained by each, and, as
has often been given to that one [
137] to whom such
information was transmitted, to act within self is that of
the highest action from the subliminal forces, see?
(Q) Night of April 14, or morning of 15, 1927. I saw
Fleischman at 51.
(A) Five, one - six. Again we find this showing that
indication of those numbers in which the general decrease is
seen coming, yet with that strength of the mighty.