6/12/1974 Letter from Henry G. Kubin:
114 Essex Drive
St. Louis, Michigan 48880
A.R.E.
P.O. Box 595
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451
Re: Kidney Stone
Reading # 1054-1
1054-2
Attention: Miss Penny Thweatt
Membership Services
Dear Miss Thweatt,
The above captioned readings are the two which I used to
dissolve my kidney stone. Reading 1054-1 was applicable when
the stone was still in the kidney. That particular reading
pointed to several complaints I had, such as bilateral kidney
pain and pain in the 8th thoracic spine region, as being
related to the stone. I also had a "hot spot" or area in the
8th thoracic spine that had a definite elevated temperature.
Mr. [Mrs.] [
1054] also had symptoms in the abdominal area
that the reading said was related. I too had these abdominal
complaints but had no idea that there was any relationship to
the cause or condition.
Upon receipt of the reading and gathering the necessary
commodities for the watermelon tea and rubs I went to my
osteopathic physician and requested osteopathic manipulation
in accordance with the reading. He did not have much faith
in the reading but figured that my back was in such shape
that osteopathic manipulation were in order for the back
even if they also happen to co-incide with the treatment
recommended in the reading.
Before the recommended treatments were completed we took a
motor trip to Florida. Mr. Cayce had suggested to others
with stones that they NOT travel. I did not heed the advice.
My stone then dropped out of the kidney into the urethra.
Fortunately this did not happen until we were a matter of
hours from home, on our way back from Florida (Disney World
was wonderful). In any event I went back to the readings
and discovered that Mr. [Mrs.] [
1054] had not headed the
readings either and his stone apparently made the same move.
Recommended treatment for his condition was changed from
rubs, watermelon tea and manipulations to turpentine stupes
and Mullein tea. So I then followed reading
1054-2 as well
as 1054-1. Within 4 weeks the stone could not be found
on x-ray.
At the time of writing I still have some symptoms referable
to the back area which are pretty much kept under control by
ordinary exercises. The "hot spot" in the back is gone but
there is still some instability there. I am, however, not
disabled in any way and enjoy golfing, swimming, and bowling.
Very truly yours,
[signed] Henry G. Kubin
Attention: Miss Penny Thweatt,
In reference to the lady's daughter in New Jersey who has a
hemangeoma. A hemangeoma is, in lay terms, a birthmark and
the readings on that are available in the "black Book". The
doctor who x-rayed my back suggested I had an excess blood
supply in my back in the vertebra around the 8th dorsal area.
This he likened to a hemangeoma but really did not say it was
a hemangeoma. He was just giving an example so that I could
understand that I had something like a birthmark on the bone.
Actually I beleave [believe] if you read 1054-1 like I read
it you would come to the conclusion that the doctor was wrong
and the reading was correct. It was not a birthmark but an
accumulation of blood in the area that was caused by a
subluxation or displaced vertebra in the back pressing on a
nerve ganglia thereby causing the blood supply from the
abdominal area and kidney area to be misdirected to the back.
The back could not handle the excess blood so it accumulated
in the back and was noted on x-ray. I have had no recent
x-rays so can neither confirm nor deny the existence of the
blood in that area but I would be willing to bet a great deal
that most of the excess blood has resolved itself. I will be
careful in the future not to allow the condition to get out
of hand.
I wrote this note separately because it was not on point
with my other note.
VTY
[signed] Henry G. Kubin
P.S. Haven't had cause to see the doctor in a long time so
the medical report form is still at home with me!
MEDICAL REPORT FORM:
Please help us to further research of the Cayce physical
readings by completing and returning to us this report form.
We'll appreciate your giving special attention to specific
suggestions for treatment given in the Cayce readings and
results - either positive or negative. Your findings will
help us to evaluate the effectiveness of the readings today.
Return to Edgar Cayce Foundation, Box 595, Virginia Beach,
VA 23451, upon completion of case.
Name Henry G. Kubin
Address 114 Essex Drive City, State St. Louis, Michigan
Sex M Age 41 Wt. 195 B.P. [blank] Diagnosis Kidney Stone
Pertinent Past History Vague subjective complaints of
bilateral kidney pain and upper dorsal back pain, over one
year duration.
History of Present Illness and Treatment: A kidney stone was
discovered by orthopedic physician on x-ray examination of
back. Patient was also advised that he had "hemangeoma" or
excess blood supply in thoracic spine.
Abnormal Physical Findings: [blank]
Total Treatment Program: Osteopathic manipulation and
diathermy as requested by patient.
Patient advised this physician that he was supplementing
treatment at home with certain rubs, teas, and turpentine
stupes recommended in A.R.E. reading for Mr. [Mrs.] [1054-1]
and [1054-2].
Patient Cooperation: Excellent X Good Poor None at all
Summary of Results (subjective, objective): Kidney stone
dissolved. Minimal subjective complaints of back and kidney
pain.
[Signature] [...]
Participating Physician (degree)
9/01/75 Letter from A.R.E. member, Natasa Hajek, to
Dr. William McGarey:
"Please have note about Circulating File on Kidney Stones.
It is partly confusing because there exists chemically four
different kinds of kidney stones and each has to be treated
differently.
"It is not clear from the files, which kind of stones they
were, but I feel most of them are urates. I myself have had
this type of stone gravel; so, I took a few pieces of this
gravel of mine (after attack) on paper, poured a little
turpentine on them, and before the turpentine evaporated,
the size was heavily diminished. Miracle!
"It could be worthwhile to repeat this experiment with
all types of kidney stones and all dissolvers from this
Circulating File and give results as first page to this file
on Kidney Stones. Each patient knows which kind of stones
he has after laboratory analysis; and so he would be able to
recognize instantly which readings of many evidently very
valuable materials in this file to use for himself..."



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation