(Q) In my last reading it was stated that the entity,
[
1266], must let go, give in, as well as the entity, [
1265],
with respect to the litigation now going on between them.
Would you kindly designate in what particulars the entity,
[
1266], should "give in, let go?"
(A) There have been and are still the disputed interests as
to what or who should be the guiding or controlling factor in
that as the litigation is concerning.
It becomes then necessary that each of these "give in, let
go," not only for their own protection but for others that
have an interest in same, and also because of that which
would be constructive in the experience of each - and not
each remain domineering to the extent of "rule or ruin."
For, unless there are concessions in these directions, it
must be a ruination in many ways. For it produces
animosities, disturbing influences in which there are the
pessimisms of each expressed rather than optimisms.
(Q) In what particulars should the entity, [
1265], "give in,
let go?"
(A) In the same way and manner. These have been the
disputed points, as to WHO is to control.
(Q) Is the entity, [
1265], honor bound to turn over this ...
Rubber stock to the entity, [
1266]?
(A) This is a disputed point also, but, as we find, this
must be determined within the mental self of each of these,
taking that into consideration which is ideal not only from
the material angle. And the distrust that is coming into the
mind of each must be removed, if the better or the best would
come for each. And that is only done by a mental attitude of
each.
(Q) Should the entity, [
1151], take aggressive steps to help
settle the case before trial in the court, or should he wait
to be called upon?
(A) As we find, rather than making the steps so aggressive
it would be well to point out - for [
1151] to point out - to
each - the necessity of their becoming in the attitude of
showing the fruits of the spirit; especially in that they
each have demonstrated, and do in so many of their
relationships demonstrate other phases of brotherly love,
patience and kindness. Yet neither is allowing self and
self's determination to be gotten out of the way. Point this
out, and then let it rest with them.
(Q) Is it better to let the case go to trial?
(A) Never better that they either are in the position of
letting others determine that which should be determined in
their own consciousnesses.
(Q) Are there other retainers of a substantial nature coming
to the entity, [
1151], in the next few months?
(A) These, as we find, depend upon the attitudes of
individuals. These then are questions not only in the minds
of the individuals but as rather a mass activity of a GROUP
of individuals.
As we would say, as we find, from the intuitive forces, these
are DUE - and there will be modes for such to be
materialized.
(Q) Is it wise for the entity, [
1151], to reduce his efforts
with relation to the Railroad Security Owners, or should he
give up this retainer?
(A) We would not give up the retainer. There has been too
great a good accomplished for the many. To be sure, these
appear upon the face of them as efforts expended without due
consideration being taken by all that are benefited. But
questions have arisen in the minds of some. To give up would
be to make those questions (in the minds of some) become
active influences in other directions that would not be well
for any.
(Q) What is the trouble with relation to the lack of
appreciation on the part of several members of the Executive
Committee of the Railroad Security Owners, which retains the
entity, [
1151], for railroad work; and is there anything the
entity, [
1151] can do to rectify their apparent lack of
cooperation and appreciation?
(A) As has just been indicated, there are some questions as
to the associations of the entity with heads of departments
in which the entity has worked and does work.
Hence, as has been indicated, it is well that these be worked
out.
(Q) Is there anything the entity can do to rectify their
apparent lack of cooperation and appreciation?
(A) Show more definitely, in a concrete manner, what would
be the outcome without the efforts of [
1151] that have been
expended in the manners in which the services have gone.
These to be sure come back to those same principles of
differences. Let each - and signify in speech and in
activity - "Ye are thy brother's keeper."
(Q) Please give any further advice that would be of help in
the affairs of [
1151].
(A) Keep that attitude of service. For, as has been given,
the ideals, the purposes of the entity are beyond reproach.
Be not weary nor disappointed in well-doing; for God is not
mocked and whatsoever a man soweth that he must also reap.
KNOW that with the Lord on thy side, no matter be there
thousands upon thousands against thee they cannot stand in
the exercising of thy conscience toward thy relationships
with thy Maker - and these are only expressed in the
relationships to the fellowman!
We are through for the present.
Copy to Self
Copy to Ass'n file
BACKGROUND
See previous readings.
9/20/37 He submitted questions.
REPORTS
11/02/37 He referred Miss [
1468] for a Life Rdg.
11/06/37 He referred Mrs. [
1472] for a Life Rdg. See
1472-1,
Par. 67-A indicating their past relationship in the Palestine
land.
11/07/37 See
1151-9, a Check-Life reading.
11/08/37 Mrs. [
1472]'s letter: "...Mr. [
1151] was in my
apartment last night. I had a group of highly evolved
friends there, he being one of them. We talked until nearly
two A.M. and Mr. [
1151] read us his Life Rdg. and that of Mr.
[
1266]. To me they are amazing in that they so smoothly
connect past and present threads in the two respective life
patterns. If I can achieve this I believe it will give me a
clearer understanding of some of the things in my present
incarnation which are a constant puzzle to me..."



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation