3/25/58 [
1434]'s letter to GD: "...Upon my aunt, [
903]'s
suggestion, I am writing to ask you to please play detective
for my sister and me.
"In 1937, [
903] requested that both my sister, [
1489] and I
receive readings. BOTH of the readings ([
1489] given on
August 28th, 1937, from Virginia Beach, AND [
1434] given on
December 2, 1937, from Scarsdale) arrived with my sister's
name and birth date ([
1489] September 30, 1926, Greenwood,
S.C.)
"Based upon our nine and eleven-year-old personalities AT THE
TIME, Aunt [
903] and Mother [
2511] assumed there must have
been a typographical error - and attributed [
1489] to me (nee
- [
1434] - May 15, 1928, Greenwood, S.C.)
"In recent years, however, our maturing personalities seem to
have changed greatly from our childhood selves - and at this
point we have no idea which readings belong to whom?
(Actually, I can see both of us in both the readings!)
"Could you possibly, Miss Davis, check your records to find
any clue as to the missing identity?
"Both [
1489] and I would greatly appreciate any information
you could give us in order to eliminate doubt over the
readings.
"To have been fortunate enough to have had the readings - and
then not to be able to utilize them would be too tantalizing
indeed!
"Thank you in advance..."
3/29/58 GD's reply to [
1434]: "...Under separate cover,
as soon as duplication can be made, I am sending to you a
copy of both life readings, with background material and
correspondence typed in date sequence. Thus you and [
1489]
can be your own detective.
"Personally, I never did feel that a mistake was made, but
[
903] was so positive about the first one being your reading
that I had to admit the possibility of an error. ...I still
feel that the first one was given for [
1489] and the last
one for you. I guess we'll never know unless something
sensational happens to one of you to verify which is which.
Even now it seems to me that the readings are very similar
with the exception of a few references to vocation. If you
and [
1489] come to any conclusions after you study the copies
being sent, we would certainly like to hear from you. We'd
like very much, in any case, to hear from each of you as to
just how your life has developed, whether you both have
married, whether you either one or both have had a career,
etc., etc. If we had such data we might be able to figure
better which belongs to which. As you know, we never knew
either of you personally, so it is hard to make a comparison.
"It was good to hear from you..."
4/01/58 GD's letter to [
1434]: "...Just a note to enclose
with the copies of your readings which I promised you. I
hope a study of these will help to clarify the puzzle about
who is who.
"A couple of things occurred to me since I wrote you last
week, which may or may not be of help to you:
"First, you will notice that in the life reading 1434-1, the
name given for the incarnation just previous to this present
one was Alice. Now this is almost identical to your present
name, and this fact is significant in that we have found in
working with all the thousands of life readings that VERY
OFTEN the name carried in the present incarnation (either the
first name or the last or sometimes BOTH) is the very same or
very similar to the name in an incarnation just previous!
This occurs SO frequently in so MANY cases that it seems at
least noteworthy.
"Another possibility which might be helpful to you in your
attempts to solve this mystery is the utilization of some of
the methods available for analysis of personality traits.
For instance, you and [
1489] might both take an aptitude test
for vocational guidance - and then compare the results of
this objective test with the two readings. Or you might both
have an analysis made of your two handwritings. I understand
that handwriting analysis is now acknowledged as legal
evidence in courts of law, so it no longer falls in the
category of 'quackery'. Perhaps you could find a good,
accredited analyst through your local Police Department?
"If I think of anything else which might throw some light on
your search, I will surely let you know. Meanwhile, do keep
us posted on developments as they occur. Of course we are
interested in this whole matter personally, as well as it
comprises more valuable evidence for our files on the
readings as a whole..."
5/07/58 Mrs. [
1434]'s letter: "How very cooperative you have
been - and we do appreciate your special attention. [
903]
and I spent a long time going over the two readings [[
1434]
and [
1489]], fluctuating back and forth - and at one point we
even thought that BOTH readings were [
1434]! [
903] has
promised that if Hugh Lynn has any spare time while he's in
N.Y., that she'll arrange for him to go over these readings
with me. Perhaps he'll have an insight which we've missed.
Incidentally, [
1489]'s middle name on her birth certificate
is [
1434] ... [my first name]. After I was born, she simply
retained [
1489] and I was [
1434].
"[
1489] and her husband [...] who lives in ..., Okla. and
have two little girls and a baby boy will meet my husband
[...] and me in Atlantic City the end of this month for a
business convention. I can assure you that we'll find
several hours to pour over the readings.
"[...] and I have a little girl 6, and a small boy, 4.
"[
1489] has been quite active in her husband's businesses as
well as doing some professional fashion modeling on her own.
"I have done some professional interior decorating.
"As you say, we may never know who is who or which is which
unless something 'sensational' happens. I'll surely write if
any new insights reveal her/my former identity."
8/01/60 Mrs. [
1434]'s letter: "I have forwarded your recent
letter [
7/08/60 See under
2791-1 Reports] concerning research
on the early American activities to [
1489].
"At this date, however, I can tell you that neither of us
has ever done research on Betsy Anne Wethers or Alice
Burgomaster.
"I can't promise you to run right out and dig up some
information; but if the opportunity presents itself, we'll
surely write you anything we may learn."