10/18/39 Julia Chandler's ltr. to HLC:
EMPIRE STATE, INC.
NEW YORK
Empire State Observatories
Julie Chandler, Manager
Dear Hugh Lynn:-
I had dinner with O'Neill [John J. O'Neill [See his talk
at A.R.E. Congress
6/17/39 on EC work], Science Editor,
N.Y. Herald Tribune] the day after your letter came, and
milched him for ideas re case histories.
He says to tell you case histories should have statements
of as many doctors as are connected with same re their
failure to perform a cure; statements from the same doctors
that they had seen the treatment (instructed through the
"Reading") given, and the results of same. These statements
should have the signature of the doctors giving them each
time. Also statements from them when the treatment
prescribed by the "Readings" is contrary to any known thus
far in medical treatment of the medical world.
O'Neill cited the case of the Hopkinsville girl [
852] cured
of peritonitis by the application of poultices of crushed
grapes. He says you should have statements as per above
outline, and in above mentioned order, from all six doctors
who had treated the case unsuccessfully; their observation
of the grape treatment; the results of same, and whether
or not it had, to their knowledge, even been tried by the
medical men.
Jack is now in Philadelphia attending some medical
convention, and last week had a magnificent article on
scientific discoveries that may lead to the prevention and
cure of cancer. He was recently conferred some fine
honorary degrees in the scientific world, and becomes more
famous every day. He has promised to help me to find a way
to again reach Ford. [Henry Ford - See
470-22, etc.]
I am happy you felt my suggestions of value.
Yesterday [
1797] walked into my office, saying he understood
I am a regional representative for the Association and
available to help one understand their readings. He asked
me to talk over his with him and I have given him
appointment at home to-morrow evening. As Mr. [
1797]
through his investments for me in stocks several years ago,
dropped considerable of my money I confess I had a BIT of a
tussle with myself to devote any of the little time I can
call my own to him. Especially as friends in the financial
world tell me the stocks he bought for me were those out of
which HE, - and not I - could make money, and that he acted
with utter selfishness in the matter. Well, - I wouldn't
take a million for his coming to me for help yesterday
because I was able to promise it without any real
hesitation, and with only a bit of inner tussle which I was
able to immediately wipe out. So, I feel I proved a little
the statement in my Egyptian "Reading" that I have made some
headway in the conquest of self during the past year, and
that's worth more than the money [
1797] lost for me!
I was surprised to learn that Tom Sugrue is still there,
but glad to know his improvement continues.
Am delighted your book is "coming on", and hope I'll soon be
having that autographed copy.
Nancy Fullwood's new book is just out, and is most vital and
significant. It is called "Behold We Come". Have you seen
it?
Have heard nothing from Josephine Buchanan since her return
to town, nor a word while she was at Virginia Beach!!
Must "sign off" as I have an appointment for which I should
already gave left the office.
Cherio! [signed] Judy
11/03/39 Julia Chandler's ltr:
I gave several hours (at his request) to [
1797] to go over
and analyze his "Readings". I have known him some years. In
fact he handled what money I had for about three years, and
did badly with it. I think he did the best he could (for
himself) but his investments for me brought me considerable
loss. This, however, did not make me any less eager to help
him now that he sees Wall Street about to crumble about his
ears. I had a long, long talk with him, and know you will be
glad to know that his "Readings" have impressed him
profoundly, and determined him to place character-building
and service above making money. I preached him a regular
sermon, but he received it in the spirit given, and has
since written me a beautiful letter telling me how much I
helped him.
12/18/39 Mr. [
1797]'s ltr. to EC:
NEW YORK
Dear Mr. Cayce,
[
2058] has just shown me his reading. I have read it
thoroughly and have found it very interesting. It should
certainly help him as it is very definite and I know he is
very much pleased.
Can you tell me the reason that some readings are so definite
and others so indefinite? Can you suggest how I might get a
more definite reading than the two I have had? I realize
very well that all this is beyond your control but it occurs
to me that experience may have shown one course or one
approach more successful than another. I would certainly
appreciate any advice or suggestions you can give me. It
would certainly seem as tho there must be many ways to be
useful and helpful to mankind under the present upset
conditions if one only knew just where to start and where
his ability could best be used. [Rest used in
1817-2
Reports.]
12/20/39 EC's ltr. to Mr. [
1797]:
Dear Mr. [
1797]:
Thank you very much for yours of the 18th. Am very glad to
know you feel Mr. [
2055] is pleased with his reading and that
it will be helpful to him. Wish could tell you in just a few
words Mr. [
1797] just why some seem to get such definite
information and others are so general. Am sure you are
just as sincere as Mr. [
2058], suppose it is something like
boys in school. Some seem to find every thing comes easy
and others just have to dig for every thing they get. Know
that was the case with our two boys - one just had to dig,
dig to get along at all, while the other every teacher he
ever had said it was a pleasure to teach him as he got every
thing so easily. But we usually find the ones that have to
dig and study to get what it is all about. Are able to
apply that they do get much better than those to whom it
comes so easily. Suppose it must be something like that
with the readings, and wish knew just how to tell you to
proceed to get just what you wish. But feel sure, will you
persevere with that as is presented, you will make the grade
even better than some one that it is handed to so easily -
they do not appreciate what is done.
Am happy indeed to know that [
1817] is better. Am glad to
have been some small help in making his condition much more
satisfactory to you and Mrs. [...] and possibly his outlook
on life and every thing much better. Glory to HIM and the
Love He has shed on the children of men.
Thank you for your good wishes - and may Joy of the Christmas
tide be with you and yours at this glad season. Thanking you
again and assuring you will be glad to try and help at any
time.
Sincerely [signed] Edgar Cayce
12/29/39 and
1/02/40 Letters used in
1817-2 Reports.
1/10/40 Mr. [
1797]'s ltr. to EC:
Dear Mr. Cayce,
I am enclosing a list of questions which I hope you will be
able to answer for me. I am sending them along for your to
read as I would appreciate your comments and also any
suggestions or advice you would care to give me on the
questions themselves, on their form or the way they are
presented. If you approve of them will you save for me the
first Saturday available, either morning or afternoon. I
would like to have the next reading at home where I can relax
and where business will not be on my mind. If you approve
and will set the date then I will advise you just where I
will be at the appointed time and will also send you the
usual check. I hope we may get some definite help and advice
this time as I certainly need it. If not I will still be
thankful for a great deal of help of another kind.
Mr. [
2841] called me today, he wants to see me next Monday.
I understand he has been in touch with you. He did not say
a reading but I will learn all about it on Monday.
Looking forward to hearing from you, I am,
Sincerely yours, [
1797]
P.S. You had better send your reply to the office - thanks.
1/13/40 EC's letter to Mr. [
257]: "Don't know so much about
Mr. [
2091] or his proposition but think from the information
given Mr. [
1797] and Mr. [
2091] they could work together on
the cooperative farm and selling or marketing proposition."
1/16/40 EC's ltr. to Mr. [
1797]:
Dear Mr. [
1797]:
Have yours of the 10th with questions for your reading.
These appear to me to be very good, only there are some that
may involve the information so as to appear to be
contradictory unless studied rather closely or it appears
that way to me. Else, it (the information) will take one
line of thought and refuse to answer or consider the rest of
the questions. As to which direction it will take one never
knows, but we can try. But you have quite a flock of them
and it may, should it undertake to answer all of them. Take
more than one sitting, but again we can but try and see what
will be the outcome.
Am making the appointment for the morning of Saturday the
27th as that is the first Saturday we have open. Hope that
will be satisfactory - the time is 10.30 to 11.30 E.S.T.
Heard from Mr. [
2841]. Wrote him and have not heard since
- just hope we can be of help if possible.
Thanking you for your letter and hoping to be of a real
service. Asking to be remembered to Mrs. [...] and the
young man.
Sincerely [signed] Edgar Cayce
1/18/40 Mr. [
1797]'s ltr. to EC:
NEW YORK
Dear Mr. Cayce,
Thank you for your letter of January 16th. You know, I sent
you my list of questions well in advance because I wanted any
advice or suggestions you might care to give me. You've had
alot of experience in this work and if you feel it would be
wiser to change my questions or to change the form, I would
be glad to do so. Please let me know what you consider
wisest.
Mr. [
2841] was in the office Monday and I believe you will
have heard from him again by now.
Best wishes to you, Mrs. Cayce and Hugh Lynn,
Sincerely,
1/20/40 EC's ltr. to Mr. [
1797]:
Dear Mr. [
1797]:
Have yours of the 18th. My suggestion was that we try and
keep the questions in the directions the information takes.
Should it start out on one particular line, once it has given
information. Our experience is it seldom - if ever -
deviates - unless it has been so general that it has left
ways open for many eventualities.
So with that in mind if you understand me, we will understand
it at time set Saturday morning the 27th 10.30 to 11.30
E.S.T.
Sincerely [signed] Edgar Cayce
1/23/40 [
1797]'s letter to EC:
New York
Dear Mr. Cayce,
Thank you for your letter and your advice. I will of
course by guided by your suggestions. You have years of
experience behind you and I know so little of these
matters that I am very happy to have your ideas. As you
can see I spent considerable time and effort on the
questions I sent you but you can see the information I
want and I know you'll do your best to get it for me.
How to do it you know best. I need the information more
than I can say, not just for materialistic purposes,
indeed this consideration has been my last one. Knowing
you and some others interested in your work has changed
many of my ideas. More than that I question more and more
the usefulness of my present work. There is of course a
chance I am wrong in this but you can see how anxious I am
to get, in some manner, information which will answer these
questions in my mind which I have tried to set down on paper.
I also feel there may be something important for me to do,
who knows, however it's now up to you, I leave it all in
your hands.
On Saturday morning, January 27th, at the time set I will
be in our house at ..., Mass. You have the exact location
which I sent you at the time of [
1817]'s readings. I will
be in my bed-room where I hope to be able to relax. Enclosed
is check for twenty dollars which I believe is the correct
amount.
I want to thank you for your many kindnesses, particularly
your thoughtfulness in this matter. Best wishes to you
and yours.
Sincerely, [
1797]
1/27/40 See
1797-3.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation