5/16/40 [
2094]'s letter to EC:
"It is nearly a week now since I wrote you regarding my
very painful conditions, asking for immediate advice. I am,
therefore, greatly puzzled at not receiving some sort of a
reply.
"As I told you I was suffering intensely as a result of the
acid condition in my intestines, which evidently came from
the taking of 'Acigest' in milk. In fact to test this,
I discontinued this remedy for several days and the more
intense contractions and burning sensations grew less and
the soreness in rectum and anus cleared up.
"As I told you, if this phenomenon were only a passing phase,
I would, of course, suffer the inconvenience for the time
being, but not hearing from you puts me in a strange dilemma.
"The effect of taking this Acigest seems to confirm what I
have often suspected, that my blood was too acid, which in
turn irritated the nerves. Of course I may be wrong.
"It may be that you did not receive my letter, if it
was incorrectly addressed. However, it would have
been returned to me, for I had my address on it.
"Or you may be offended at my questioning the accuracy of
your findings. If that is true, I am sorry. But, as you no
doubt realize, there is quite a difference between your first
and second examination. Or I should perhaps say, there was
considerable addition to the first. The serious condition
of the colon region was not noted; the stomach disorder also.
There was a change in the advice to use the Radio-Active
machine to a Wet Cell electric device. I am not objecting to
this. I simply must use my intelligence to not give it up,
and notice the reactions of my body to the treatment you
advise. I have in the first instance, also told you of the
seeming disturbances resulting from osteopathy in the past.
In the last two months of treatment there has been very
little appreciable change for the better, certainly not in
the lower extremities. I should say that in many ways, I
feel much worse. In spite of that, I have continued, but I
must understand why this is so. I cannot do things blindly.
If that is required of your patients, then I am not a good
one.
"If I understand, even if things appear worse, I will go on
as far as anyone. It seems to me I am entitled to a frank
statement from you, if you please..."
6/02/40 [
2094]'s letter to EC:
"It is again necessary to write you concerning the effect of
the remedy you suggested for me to take: Acigest. I find
it produces the most disagreeable symptoms, increasing
the tension in my legs, abdomen and back and the strong
contraction and irritation of the rectal sphincter. I wrote
you some weeks ago about the same symptoms and after waiting
a week, I discontinued, for no word came from you in reply.
Later a letter was received from your son suggesting that
I wait until I could put all the suggested treatment into
operation at once. Therefore, when the electric battery
arrived a week ago, I began with the Acigest in raw milk,
using at first only a few drops, increasing the same a little
each day. I have not yet reached half a teaspoonful yet.
Nevertheless, the irritating effect has increased, until now
I feel that I cannot continue this remedy, unless I have your
assurance that this is only a temporary effect. I asked this
question before, but have received no reply.
"So far, I have seen no improvement. On the contrary,
a distinct getting worse of my symptoms. Although I am
following your advice and am going twice a week to Dr.
Dobbins - with whose treatments I am satisfied insofar as
they are good treatments, but the effects do not seem good,
but produce an irritation; a sensation of burning throughout
my lower body and legs which is hard to bear. It may be
too early to tell what the effect is. I have had nine
osteopathic treatments, but only a week of the gold
electric treatment. I shall appreciate an early reply.
"Please change my address to the one at the top of this
letter. I asked to have this done in my last letter, but
it was ignored.
"I shall also appreciate your not telling anyone of my
consulting you. It is nobody else's business but my own. I
have tried so many different things that I do not care to try
to explain that I am trying something quite different now..."
6/03/40 EC's letter to [
2094]:
"I have yours of the 2nd. I'm sorry about the delay, but I
was away, for a bit of rest. From your letter and the effect
of the Acigest, suppose we check up on the conditions Friday
morning, the 7th, 10:30 to 11:30 E.S.T.? Please wire me, as
you possibly wouldn't have time for a letter, unless special;
but don't airmail, just special delivery.
"That is the best way I know how to answer your questions
about it. I think you find Dr. Dobbins an excellent man.
"Let me know about Friday morning..."
6/05/40 [
2094]'s letter to EC:
"Your letter just received, marked special delivery, but
without special delivery stamp. Hence it came ordinary mail.
"The time you suggest, 10:30 to 11:30, June 7th will be
observed by me. One thing I neglected to ask when I visited
you, or during your describing of my conditions and one which
is important, is the following: Is there any degeneration
and destruction of the nerve cells of the spinal nerve?
Is this condition repairable or can a normal condition be
restored? This is, of course, important.
"I should like to remark that when I took hydrochloric
acid in the form of acidulum [?], I did not have such an
irritation of my intestines and rectum as now.
"I note also that the Acigest seems to effect the kidneys,
because I note more copious and frequent urine; also
some slight irritation in the urethra. When I have this
irritation in the kidneys, I notice that my eyes are also
affected. My eyes bother me considerably and are inflamed
and sensitive, and have been for some time. I have dropped
the Acigest temporarily.
"By the way, I hear Mr. [
2091] and Dr. [
2246] have not found
any oil. Too bad.
"With best wishes..."
6/07/40 See
2094-3.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation