12/06/40 [
2386]'s ltr. to EC:
..., Calif.
Dear Mr. Cayce;
Thank you for your kind letter of Nov. 9th, which I am just
getting around to answer. As you know, I travel a great deal
and so my correspondence must wait until such time as I get
back to take care of it.
I am enclosing herewith an astrological reading made by Miss
Sylvia Harding, one of the best astrologers here-abouts. In
sending it to you, I am sure you will understand that I do so
in no spirit of criticism of your reading. What we are both
after are facts - as much of the Truth as we can see. And as
a scientific man, I see it always as best to get as many
different angles on a given proposition as possible. This is
always best done with no subjective feelings oneself, one way
or the other. A perfectly objective and detached attitude is
the only one - at least in my experience - which is fruitful
of the best results.
As you yourself claim no knowledge of the readings which flow
through as a channel, it follows that some other Intelligence
or intelligences work through you. It is to Them, therefore,
that this communication is mainly addressed. They have set
my astrological chart up, I take it, or you would not have
asked for the facts concerning my time and place and birth -
which has been worked out to within the two minutes of
accuracy needed for best astrological reading. Knowing
almost to the minute when I was born, Miss Harding has spent
some six months in checking my life's experiences against
this time to establish thereby the EXACT time, which she now
thinks she knows and upon which her reading is based. In any
event her reading is based on the same time and place as
yours, therefore it becomes interesting to note that in many
respects they do not agree. The study of disagreements, I
have fund, often leads to knowledge. It is in this spirit,
therefore, that I am sending the Harding reading on to you in
the hope and expectation that you may feel inclined to take
it up with Those who worked through you in giving me your
reading.
Yes, I had the pleasure of having lunch with your son Hugh.
He is a fine intelligent chap and I wish that I might work in
this field with him. In fact I hold the ambition, which I
probably shan't achieve, to devote the remainder of my life
to nothing but psychic research. So far the means to do
this, however, have not come my way.
I know Roxanna [Roxanna Wells] well. In fact she has a
manuscript copy of ... which I'm sure she would be glad to
lend you should you care to read it. It has had a very great
effect upon many people. Strange, it is the only one of my
writings which publishers have turned down. The main comment
seems to be that because of its subject matter, it would not
be "box office".
If there is anyway in which I can cooperate with your work,
let me know. Trusting that I shall hear from you again, and
wishing you every success, believe me,
Sincerely yours, [
2386]
P.S. You may keep all scripts which I send or have sent you,
as I have copies.
[enclosed astrological reading]
The Astrological aspects as given in this reading of Mr.
Cayce are contrary to the planetary positions as given in the
Ephemeris for December 9th 1891.
In the Cayce reading on page two, the statement is made that
the planet Uranus is strong but "at variance to both Jupiter
and Venus". On the contrary, the planet Uranus is in good
aspect to both planets, being sextile to Venus and trine to
Jupiter. Naturally a benefic aspect between planets is of
course different than the malefic one above quoted and
therefore if the premise of the reading is mathematically
false, how can a reading based on this premise be true?
If, as the reading states, that "Uranus is at variance to
both Jupiter and Venus" it should add the planet Mercury,
because the two planets Venus and Mercury are in an exact
conjunction and therefore must share equally in all aspects.
This "twin" position is very unusual and is really the
keynote of the reading of the horoscope, but it is not noted
by Mr. Cayce.
The reading states on page two, paragraph four, "we find
Venus, Mercury, Jupiter and Uranus the ruling forces;" but it
does not speak of Mars, Saturn and the Moon which are also
extremely powerful. Mars is the ruler of itself, Uranus, the
rising sign and the Moon. Saturn rules this above-mentioned
conjunction of Venus and Mercury.
On page two, paragraph seven the reading warns against the
mind "becoming sidetracked, or becoming...as it were...too
intense upon any ONE influence". The planetary positions in
this chart do not bear this out. The planets are well placed
and cover many signs, seven to be exact while the Midheaven
holds another; all of which show good integration and
balance. An unusual feature of this horoscope is the fact
that it seems to work on two planes at all times. This is
due to the exact conjunction of Venus and Mercury.
The planet ruling this conjunction is really the strongest
planet in the chart as Venus and Mercury are on the cusp of
the tenth house; the most important position, that of the
Midheaven. Saturn being the ruler of the sign Capricorn in
which they are placed also is the natural ruler of ANY 10th
house. This makes this chart unusual to a degree and yet
Saturn is not mentioned in the list of ruling planets.
The part of Capricorn holding this configuration is said to
relate to "a new order of things". Persons born under this
are forerunners of better things - using systems and
organizations (Capricornian traits) to further their ends.
Large economic mergers, business and politics are associated
with this section of the heavens. The keyword Co-ordination
is used to describe the mode of expression best suited to
this part of Capricorn.
It is interesting to note that Saturn is placed in the last
degree of Virgo, ruled by Mercury but traveled by progression
into Libra ruled by Venus. After staying here for years it
retrograded back into Virgo. This shows the integration of
the chart still more as you cannot leave out either Venus or
Mercury, they being exactly together at the moment of birth.
Saturn in the sign Virgo on the material plane gives hard
work and much detail. "Duty calls".
The paragraph on page two about Mercury the mental planet,
and Venus the beautiful is true enough but they represent
those qualities in every person's chart and the outstanding
sign and position of these two planets is not referred to.
The good aspect in this December 9th chart between Venus and
Uranus (which Cayce mentions as "at variance") gives humor,
love of music and much personal magnetism. If the planets
were "at variance" there would be an opposite tendency and
would be especially shown as to non-cooperation with fellow
workers or anyone contacted. This does not fit this chart.
Also Mr. F. would be in the words of Carter "a grouser and a
malcontent" which is not borne out by the planets. Saturn
ruling Mercury (the mind) is in good aspect to Uranus and
Mars and it would take an adverse aspect of these planets to
justify the forementioned reading.
The planets Mars and Uranus are in conjunction and well
aspected by the others and therefore give a brusque way, a
tendency to be outspoken and a tendency to be unconventional.
There is no "soft-soaping" in this particular setup. In
contradistinction to the adverse aspect referred to by Cayce,
we have originality and leadership, instead of the inability
to get along with people (as the words "at variance" would
indicate). Also there would be intense spurts of enthusiasm
that would die out leaving things half-done, which is not
indicated.
The Sun is in the part of Sagitarius belonging to transmuted
Sex and is known as the Aries-decanate. We find Aries rising
and also holding the Moon; and so Sun, Moon and rising sign
(individuality, personality and method of expression and also
personal appearance respectively) work in close cooperation.
The Sun or vital center is in good aspect (trine) with the
Ascendant (degree rising) which is one of the most valued
aspects to be found in a chart at birth. This part of Aries
that rises gives those who have it, the desire to search for
new fields of expression as well as endowing them with
restless minds and wonderful executive ability.
The Sun is also in the so-called royal part of the sign and
is ruled by the humanitarian and occult Jupiter. Jupiter is
placed in Pisces a "double" sign. The ruler of Pisces,
Neptune, is placed in the double sign of Gemini. Everywhere
we find the double-planetary setup and seeing that Venus and
Mercury are "double" and are in the 9th house, or house of
"penetration" on every plane, it bears out the possibility of
the life being lived on two planes at once. The 8th house
holding the Sun is occult and having to do with the
afterlife promises fame after death.
Gemini holds the intuitional planet Neptune and the 5th
degree is very important. It gives power to note details as
well as to comprehend the whole and also gives the power to
see correct proportions. This degree also relates to
aviation. Zain says a person with an important planet in
this part of Gemini can easily become an intellectual giant,
for they assimilate all that they contact and their
deductions rise spontaneously from the astral brain.
A close interrelationship between Neptune and Jupiter here is
shown in the fact that Neptune is in the Mercury-decanate of
Gemini and the planet Jupiter (placed in Neptune's sign
Pisces) is in the Neptunian decanate of the same. This is
the same as everyone speaking each other's language altho
living in different places. This part of Pisces is also
known as the "secret-service" part of the sign and is also
placed in the 12th house (representing hidden work) in this
particular chart. Zain again says this part of Pisces
denoted "a detective of the highest order, whether their
talent be directed to social conditions, or to the wider
mysteries of universal relations."
We note that Jupiter has now entered into the next decante of
Pisces which is between 20 and 30 degrees, and is known to be
one of restriction and limitation. Those having a
humanitarian planet here in their charts are supposed to have
taken this on in order to help humanity.
Those having Aries Ascending coincide with the mundane chart
of the heavens as Aries is on the first house of the heavenly
horoscope. They should therefore feel the pulse of the world
better. The Moon here is in the first degree of the sign, a
powerful position. It means "divine fire" and its symbol is
the triangle - denoting both flame and mind. Body, mind and
spirit, are therefore correlated with a tendency to pioneer
and lead. As the triangle points upward, so does the life.
There is also a coloring of death or destruction to this part
of the sign, perhaps explained by the kind of work you have
had to do.
The last 10 degrees of Aries or the Sagittarian-decanate
which I think is rising, is ruled by Jupiter and leans
towards philosophical things and AGAIN we find a tendency to
champion lost causes, etc. We must also not overlook the
musical angle shown by Aries and Sagittarius, and the imagery
and perception of Pisces together with the necessary routine
or practice of Saturn in the sign Virgo.
All places in this horoscope show a spiritual and
humanitarian coloring which is intensified by the strategic
placing of the stars Difda; Aldebaran; Hamal and Fomalhaut as
well as some others. This gives points of energy or mass.
Anyone possessing these can give out to others thru these
points. Planets in the first degrees of signs do the same
thing, and we find Mars in 1 Scorpio, Moon in 1 Aries and
Saturn holding jurisdiction by progression over 1 Libra.
Mars is in a creative place in conjunction with Uranus. And
both are posited in the house relating to "public contacts
and partnerships". It is connected with plans, maps, graphs
etc. This also draws towards magnetism and healing power.
This 7th house also describes marriage relationships and
these 2 planets so placed is apt to give an impulsive
marriage with much necessary adjustment necessary. Mars and
Uranus also give contact with dangerous characters and
dangerous work but very good results.
Your Sun in the 8th house of death was in a dangerous year
when you were about 44. Will you check on this? [Was in
grave physical danger doing Federal work in "Bloody" Harlan
County etc.] However the apparently dangerous Sun position
is trine the Ascendant and that is a marvellous protector as
well as the fact that two malefics, Mars and Uranus are
unusually well aspected.
Strong analyzation and a constant desire to theorize is shown
by the relationship of Venus and Mercury. This is especially
strong as far as your emotions go, because the planets of
mind and heart are together but Mercury has more power in the
chart and therefore your mind rules your heart. Saturn going
back to the final jurisdiction of Mercury (in Virgo) instead
staying in the sign of Venus proves this conclusively. If it
were not for Mars and Uranus breaking the bad aspect between
Saturn and Venus you would have had more disappointments than
you have already had.
The positions of planets seem to indicate that things are apt
to come to you after middle age. Mercury which is in good
aspect to Mars also gives optimism and Uranus gives humor so
you are well balanced to hold off the great discipliner
Saturn! Any rebellion that you felt in early life due to
this square was also helped by an opposition of the Moon and
Saturn. But of late years Saturn has turned and is backing
away and will continue in this retrogression. You had
distrust then and you still have but just because you have
been burned once does not mean that you will be again. Now
that you have a working-chart put up for the correct time you
can compare other people's planets in relationship to yours
and know upon whom you can depend. You have a flair for
choosing the right person for the right job and this is given
by a sextile between the Moon (the people) and Neptune
(intuition). It (this sextile) also gives a desire to work
subrosa and is apt to give symbolic visions at certain times.
On the negative side of the chart, your Saturn is so aspected
so as to give spells of worry, depression,
over-sensitiveness. However so much activity in the chart
and a desire to better conditions keeps you going on but
there is always a shadow of the above. This planet Saturn
also gives a very accurate turn of mind in dealings with
fellow workers and falling in the 6th house or that relating
to fellow workers makes you a hard taskmaster as far as
details go.
There is a kindly broadminded ray from Jupiter which gives
facility in the matter of business correspondence, reports,
orders, short trips, pamphlets. Certainly this is in direct
contradistinction to the "variance" aspect given to you by
Mr. Cayce! There is an inner trust and a practical
application to matters given by this same aspect.
Impatience is one of your chief faults and it comes from two
main things. The impulsive sign Aries rising and the
restless Moon in the same sign. Aries is a fire sign and the
Moon is a water planet and when fire hits water you get
steam! Then too a wide square (9 degrees) between Mercury
and Saturn gives impatience also. Your mind tends to jump
ahead and you sometimes forget that the average mind cannot
keep up with you.
Your idealism comes from a good Mercury-Uranus-Jupiter
configuration which Mr. Cayce stated was a bad one. Neptune
the planet of idealism is also beautifully aspected. The
total disregarding of this important occult planet in Mr. C's
reading is rather strange because they set so much stress on
the higher planes and Neptune is the chief significator in
these matters. Venus also tends to give magnanimity and a
predilection for the arts. Genuine affection and a love for
the many is found here in the relationship between Mars,
Uranus and Venus-Mercury for there the heart and the mind are
one. Uranus is noted for its impersonality.
There is a tendency to sarcasm as Saturn and Venus are not
very friendly but there is no MEAN streak to this. According
to the adverse aspect discovered by Mr. C, there should be
spitefulness. Strangely enough the REAL squares are
disregarded entirely by Mr. Cayce, and totally non-existant
ones are put in, so I do not see how the date of birth could
have been consulted in any way!
The aspects between Venus, Mercury and Uranus give intuitive
powers and a fine perception of love which is so impersonal
as to appear hard but which works out for the best interests
of all concerned. Uranus is the planet of universal
betterment, by out-of-the-ordinary means. This planet
together with Mars causes nervous irritability and leads
towards dangerous pursuits, but gives great courage and being
well aspected, gives protection. Uranus and Jupiter in GOOD
aspect, contrary to Mr. C, gives fine judgement as to your
own original views on the metaphysical. I find that a good
aspect between Saturn and Neptune (which you have) is apt to
give a feeling of a stronger personality in another world,
and the desire to follow them or to work for them. Saturn
square the cusp of the house of sisters shows obstacles or
disappointments in this direction.
Any disappointment regarding fellow workers not being able to
keep up with you, comes from an angle of 150 degrees and
always gives disappointment. Just let it pass as it is one
of your crosses. By the position of your Jupiter you know
that tho the outcome of your acts may be invisible, they are
doing their work all the time and sometime the results will
be shown.
The fact that almost all planets are posited in known occult
positions is not mentioned in the Cayce reading. There is so
much vagueness expressed and symbology used to express that
vagueness that the reading could really be used to hit any
person with any sort of leanings towards things of a higher
nature. There is nothing distinctive in this interpretation.
I cannot see that the chart was ever put up for the date and
time given, and yet the words "Astrological aspects" are
used, which gives the impression that it was erected
Astrologically.
12/12/40 EC's ltr. to [
2386]:
Dear Mr. [
2386]:
Have yours of the 6th - thank you very much for sending me a
copy of the report by Miss Harding. However if you are a
student of Psychic phenomena am sure you know one is a
psychic reading - the other what is supposed to be a fact
determined by general accepted students of astrology - of one
school or another. Please know however I am not trying to
defend the Life reading nor to compare it with any
Astrological reading - it doesn't purport to be an
astrological reading - doesn't reason from the same basis at
all. The only thing is that some terms that are used in such
are used in same - but it is not purported to be such.
My only purpose in same Mr. [
2386] is this - can such
readings be of a help to individuals - that is what we call
LIFE readings - out of the 11 or 12 hundred that have been
given more than 98 percent of them have expressed their
belief they have proven helpful to them - that is my only
reason for ever giving one for they to my little mind present
too fantastic tales to me. Oh have met many Astrologers -
possibly the best ever had in this country was Miss Adams -
there was the first comparison that was ever made - when an
astrological reading was asked for in body and chart it
agrees with the better ones - when a LIFE is asked for often
it does not agree with a chart - why I do not know except
from what the information itself says - "that is this an
individual has a free will - and doesn't necessarily have to
follow the inclinations from astrological aspects - and when
they don't it creates different problems in their experience
which are taken into account."
The whole answer then to me - can information given in a Life
reading be helpful the answer is as said above.
No - again do not think or believe am guided by an individual
intilect [intellect?] outside my body - the information - as
well as many who are called first class mediums say "it comes
from the universal consciousness" whether that makes sense or
not to not io [is?] not know - again the proof is what is the
experience of those who have and do apply suggestions made
for help.
Was in N.Y. for a three weeks stay recently - had two open
meeting while there saw Roxanna at one of these meetings -
she looks well - fine but think she is working too hard for
her own good.
Thanks for your offer - but do hope you will get the
difference (if any) between an astrological reading and a
LIFE - before even commenting on information.
Thanking you.
With all good wishes and hopes for a pleasant Holiday season
Sincerely [signed] Edgar Cayce
2/05/43 HLC's ltr. to [
2386]:
Mr. [
2386]
..., Calif.
Dear Mr. [
2386]:
I remember pleasantly a lunch we had together in New York
several years ago. At that time I hoped we would see you in
Virginia Beach, and I shall not give up that wish. There are
many angles of our work in which you would be interested.
The trade edition of THERE IS A RIVER is to be released on
March 5th. We are anxious that this book be presented to as
many of those groups as possible who would have some common
background of interest. Theosophists, Rosicrucians,
Spiritualists and New Thought groups of all kinds might well
be interested, especially in particular sections of it.
If you could take the time to get the names and addresses of
a few of the leaders of the best known groups of this kind
there it would be a great help. I will write them and see if
arrangements can be made to have circulars about the book
distributed at their meetings.
Sincerely, HLC
2/10/43 [
2386]'s ltr. to HLC:
Mr. Hugh Lynn Cayce,
Association For Research and Enlightenment, Inc.,
Virginia Beach, Va.
Dear Mr. Cayce;
I have your letter of the 5th instant. Confined to the house
for several days with a severe cold, I am able to answer it
at once. Otherwise, in these turbulent and busy times, I
might not have gotten around to it for some time.
A research engineer by profession, I am, by training and
temperament, not a "joiner". While I respect God and serve
him according to such light as has been given me, I have but
small respect and no use for established religion and the
churches. Which is to say that I don't go to church nor
associate with the cultists.
To lay claim to a formalized knowledge of God's intentions
and purposes is, to my mind, a confession of ignorance and an
impertinence bordering on blasphemy. To assure others of,
and instruct them in, a knowledge one does not have is in all
cases misguided, and in many cases dishonest.
In this day and age, there is a strong trend towards finding
things out before expressing blind faith in them, and, after
having found them out beyond reasonable doubt, to accept them
only as workable hypotheses subject to change, at any time,
in the light of better information.
While the line of demarcation between faith and knowledge can
seldom exactly be located, these two attitudes of mind can be
exactly differentiated; faith being the (often) blind
acceptance of purported fact without the mental reservation
of a possible future change of mind in the light of better
evidence, and knowledge being the acceptance of demonstrably
workable data with, however, the ever-present willingness to
throw this data overboard in favor of wider and more workable
horizons.
We are approaching the age of knowledge - still quite a
distance off in many fields - and leaving the hospitable and
easy shores of faith. To my mind, this transition, when
accomplished, will vindicate our claim to being cast in the
image and likeness of God and bring us a step nearer to His
Angels.
In the light of the foregoing, I offer you and your respected
father a prayer which, on the spur of a single instant, came
to me in inspiration. I call it the technical man's prayer.
"O Lord, Hear my supplication!
Open my eyes to Truth, that out of Your all-comprehending
mercy and understanding I may see Your world and my fellowmen
as You have made them - not as I wish them to be.
Unseal my ears to the eternal rhythm and cadence of Your
Universe, that I may hear Your voice and word in the causes
of all things - not the empty echo of my own pronouncements.
Enlighten my understanding, that I may know that behind all
that which is, You are - not the feeble reflection of my own
personality.
Teach me to believe but one thing, - Your reality and
ever-present nearness to me.
Instill within my heart and mind the consuming desire to
know all else by my own work and effort, that I may at long
last come to the perfect understanding and realization of
Your mighty works, and so pass on from this temporal
consciousness to whatever destiny Your unfailing wisdom may
have ordained for me."
This desire to lean on my own lunch, i.e. to be cautiously
guided by demonstrable and workable data whether obtained by
myself or others, has made me an agnostic and an iconoclast -
but not in the usually disagreeable sense. I'm widely open,
in fact flamingly open, to all aspects of truth and fact.
Material presented as a dictum in the old "believe it or
else" fashion receives small comfort at my hands.
All of which means that while I have read up widely on the
various current religions and systems of metaphysics, I have
joined none of them. In most of them I have found their
doctrines clothed in mystic language, or their higher
knowledge reserved for the chosen. Thus a most charming and
cultured lady the other day told me when I asked her what
"work in the temple" meant as it came through in automatic
writing, that I wasn't far enough along to understand and so
could not be told. To which I replied that doubtless she
might not be "far enough along" to comprehend the Riemannian
system of multi-dimensional geometry, but that never the
less, I, and all followers of the Muse of Rigorous Thought,
would at any time be delighted to explain it in simplest
terms to her or to anybody else who might show an interest.
And that is exactly the quarrel I have with most of the
established mystics cults. My idea of a happy Utopian world
is, in part, a place with a huge library where all
accumulated knowledge and information is stored, a place
available to all without exception.
In this frame of mind, I have had to keep away from the
association with persons who, in the field of psychics, do
not follow the scientific method. Which is not to say that I
have not worked in this field a great deal. And I have
associated myself with many who feel as I do about it.
Early last year, I formed a Group here in Los Angeles, and
our purpose is to study psychic phenomena from the scientific
angle. I am enclosing our first Bulletin. We have been
unable to go further than this because I have been unable to
get certain materials and supplies because of the priority
situation. However God willing, I shall go ahead with this
Group and with this work the very moment that I can get the
needed technical supplies. And if, happily, I and my
apparatus look in on a direct voice sitting, and if it
actually occurs as claimed, then we are all going to know
about it beyond any question of doubt. Every factor will be
controlled, and we will come out with knowledge as opposed to
faith - at least in so far as the actuality of the phenomena
are concerned.
Incidentally, I have established very fine and well equipped
laboratories out here and, again God willing, before I get
through, I'm going to have every technical means that can be
devised and available for this kind of work.
So much for my objective studies. On the purely subjective
side, I am sitting regularly with a friend, a retired
playwright, and most interesting material of a subjective
nature is coming through.
You can well imagine that I am more or less persona non grata
with the professional mediums and mystics, in which this
locality abounds. For that reason I don't believe I can be
of much benefit to you in the distribution of your book.
However I shall send you a page of ads in the local
newspapers, and maybe you can compile a list from it. While
everybody knows that my whole effort is aimed at proving, not
disproving, the actuality of psychic phenomena, I'm
distrusted by most, and cordially disliked by others,
because, for instance, I won't play ball with Big Chief Tall
Standing Corn whose only claim to actuality is a deep bass
voice heard rolling out of a cone in a pitch black room
filled with ardent believers; or, again, because, in the soft
red and non-revealing glow of a materialization seance, I
don't bubble over with bliss when my deceased grand-father,
the late and distinguished [...] gentleman of the old school
- with side-burns - and one of the great intellectuals of his
day, struts forth from a cabinet in a bed sheet and addresses
me in execrable German! (Maybe my name [...] and blond hair
had something to do with a supposed Teutonic origin which
actually is Scotch-Irish.)
And again, when I turn to, say, the Rosicrucians, and get
handed a ponderous volume in which, minutely set forth, is
the whole history of the sidereal universe with all God's
intentions and purposes - well, when I want to know how I can
get in on all that information, I get invited to join the
kindergarten and work up. I couldn't be shown anything, of
course. Oh dear me no! I must put in months and years of
arduous preparation - at so much a throw! The fact that I'd
be welcome in most any laboratory in the country to witness
most any experiment, whether it was exactly in my field or
not - no, that's not how they work it. It takes spiritual
preparation to love God and desire to see His works,
according to these good people. The fact that tens of
thousands of people, good, bad and indifferent, have seen,
and continue to see, all manner of phenomena at all manner of
times and in all manner of places all over the earth, - this
has no bearing, of course. "The inner temple" remains a
mystery and scientific heathen are not wanted.
If you have any correspondents out here who might see this
picture eye to eye with me, I'd like to meet them. I'm
perfectly able to understand and appreciate the work of your
father - because he makes no mystery of it and gives it out
freely to all in need. And I'm very sorry that I'm so far
from Virginia Beach as I should very much like to see some of
his work. Maybe I shall some day. Please give him my
respects and kind regards. I'll send you along such
information on the groups out here as I may be able, from
time to time, to pick up.
Sincerely yours, [
2386]
P.S. If your father has any friends or controls on the other
side of life who might care to work with a technical man, a
well equipped laboratory, and the means, priorities only
excepted, to carry on experiments of whatever intricacy, I
would greatly appreciate being introduced to them. I will be
on the look-out for them and send out a call for them,
particularly on Tuesday nights, 8:30 P.M. Pacific War time,
in ... the apartment of Mr. [...].
If advised in advance, I will be delighted to work out any
cross-checks or references with your father and his friends.
Mr. [...] and myself, when teamed, constituted a fairly good
sensitive team. We communicate by means of a psychograph or
writing board, which I devised in the laboratories - a
totally different instrument to any which you may have seen.
2/24/43 HLC's ltr. to [
2386]:
Dear Mr. [
2386]:
Thank you very much for your letter of Feb. 10th and also for
the bulletin which you sent me. I have read them both with
great interest.
As you already know, I am greatly interested in the methods
which you use in studying Psychological Research. I like the
way your mind works and also the results it produces. I
certainly hope that some day we will have an opportunity to
follow up some of the information which has been indicated
through my father's readings and work out with you both in
discussion and in application many of the suggestions it
contains.
Under separate cover I am sending you photostats of old
newspaper clippings which I thought might be of interest to
you. The consistent accuracy of my father's readings over
such a long period of time as indicated by these clippings is
as you know a rare occurrence in the field of psychic
research.
I will write you a little later about the possibility of
doing some cross-check work.
Any help you can give us in publicizing the book out there
will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely, Hugh Lynn Cayce HLC:gn
4/03/43 [
5/03/43?] [
2306]'s letter:
Dear Mrs. Denney;
Pursuant to your request for a contribution, enclosed please
find my check for five dollars.
Give my best regards to Hugh Lynn and tell him I wish him a
safe home-coming.
Sincerely yours, [
2306]
[Ruth Denney, editing the A.R.E. Bulletin after HLC went into
the Army. See 4/43 issue.]
5/10/43 EC's ltr. to [
2386]:
Dear Mr. [
2386]:
Thank you for yours of the 3rd - appreciate your kindly
thought and help. What we are mostly interested in tho is
contributions of material for the Bulletin. But certainly
appreciate yours that will help in a very material way.
H. L. was home yesterday for a few hours. He is in Special
Service Unit, and should be able to get into the line he is
possibly best fitted for.
Again thanking you
Sincerely [signed] Edgar Cayce
12/43 Mr. [
2386] referred a friend for a Physical Reading.


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation