8/25/41 Mrs. [
1472]'s letter to HLC:
Dear Hugh Lynn:
The attached letter from [
2505] and my reply to it need but
little embellishment. Please show both to your father and
return to me after you have both read them.
I suggest that you each read the answer to the question I
asked about in the reading Edgar gave me just after my return
from California. This would be June 1938. [
1472-6, Par.
26-A, 27-A] I think you will both find what was said very
illuminating.
[
2505] is a lecturer on metaphysics and the author of some
thirty books along the same lines. He is widely heard and
widely read. [
5/29/38 See her report on [
2505] under
1472-3,
Par. R11. Also see
1472-6, Par. 26-A, 27-A warning her of
[
2505]'s influence.]
When he was here in the late Summer and Fall two years ago he
was furious with me because I went to Virginia Beach over the
Labor Day week-end instead of staying here and hearing him
lecture. He wrote me a letter asking: "What has Edgar Cayce
to give you that I have not?" And when he returned to
California he wrote me a very resentful letter because I had
not given him more of my time. The reason I went to none of
his lectures and saw no more of him than necessary is found
in the answer the "reading" mentioned above gave to my
question about him.
Please let me know if there is any truth in [
2505]'s
statement that the Association has tried to get George
Wehner [George Wehner, Spiritualist] to work with your
father. It is important that I know this at once, for, if
[
2505] is still in New York, he will spread this report, and
nothing could be more disastrous to Edgar's work in MY
estimation than to have him associated in the thought of
people with George Wehner. I, therefore, want to be in a
position to deny such a claim as [
2505] makes if it is not
true, as I feel sure it is not.
Do let me hear from you, and give my love to all the family.
Devotedly yours, [
1472]
[
1472]'s letter to EC:
Dear Edgar:-
I wrote a note to Hugh Lynn to-day to inclose a letter I
received this morning from [
2505] and my reply to same. I
asked him to show both to you before returning them, and
suggested that both you and Hugh Lynn read the answer given
me in a reading I had in June of 1938 [
1472-6 Par. 26-A,
27-A] regarding [
2505]. I think it will explain much to you.
The only thing that disturbed me about the [
2505] letter was
his statement about George Wehner had told him he (Wehner)
had been sought by the Directors of our Association to work
with you. I do not believe a word of this, and asked Hugh
Lynn to let me know if it is true in any sense. I couldn't
imagine your working with a person like George Wehner, who
is, in my opinion, controlled by earth-bound spirits.
8/26/41 EC's reply to Mrs. [
1472]:
Dear [
1472]:
Have yours of the 25th - also saw the letter to H. L. and
the letter from and to Mr. [
2505]. So will reply at once.
You of course are quite right in assuming there could
possibly be no connection between Geo Wehner and me. Have
met him, of course, but how any one could even imagine there
could be any associations, well, don't quite know. Remember
Mr. [
2505] very well and the circumstances of his visit here.
What he evidently told you and what he said to me when here,
doesn't sound as if they came from the same purpose in life,
maybe they do from same source as we ordinarily know it, but
not from the same spiritual source. Sounds much more like
the suggestion to you in your reading. That should be enough
said.
Have had letters from several to whom he sent literature
while here and The Master was right - "By their fruits Ye
Shall Know Them."
8/27/41 HLC's letter to [
1472]:
Dear Mrs. [
1472]:
Thank you very much for your recent letter regarding [
2505].
The information in the Reading certainly seems to check up on
him. He seems to be a nice person and very much interested
in himself, and a Life Reading brought this out. People
don't like to face themselves even when it's put in a nice
manner. I am returning the copies of the letters to you.
Regarding the contact with George Wehner, I can assure you
that the Association has not made any proposals to Wehner,
naturally you would have known about such steps if they had
been taken. I think Dave Kahn knows George and years ago
under the old Association when Mr. Blumenthal was active, a
number of sittings were held with him. I was present for
some of these myself. Wehner's statements undoubtedly refer
to his contact with Kahn and Blumenthal, and in no way
related to our present organization or program. As you know,
we have at one time or another run into practically everyone
in this field.
We are looking forward to seeing the Dillmans this weekend
and hope they are planning to buy a home somewhere in this
vicinity. It would indeed, be a good idea if you would
consider the same plane. The time is not so far away when we
all may need a little ground to grow what we need for
sustenance. I can see possibilities in some specialized
farming with the Association estates operating under a
general head with each one furnishing and exchanging certain
particular items. Shall I put your field down for wheat, or
wheat for the chickens to eat? There have been many Platonic
dreams of such programs down through the ages.
I am particularly interested in this whole idea, in view of
the fact that I have decided to get married October 10th.
The girl whom I am going to make supremely happy is Sally
Taylor. Yah! I think you met her here at the Congress
sometime ago.
We are still hoping to see you sometime before log. It would
be nice if you could come down for a week-end at least.
Regards from all.
Sincerely, HLC
5/19/55 HLC wrote Mr. [
2505] thanking him for participating
in A.R.E. panel on prayer.


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation