8/30/41 [
2576]'s ltr. to EC:
Dr. Edgar Cayce,
Virginia Beach, Va.
Dear Dr. Cayce:-
I have taken a few days of time to peruse repeatedly your
READING of August 22nd., inst, before replying. First I want
to say that I am greatly indebted to you for your courtesy.
I thank you, and shall remember you in a more substantial
manner at another time. Be assured of my great appreciation
of your attention to me. It meant very much, even if I did
not say so.
Now for the record: your File 2576-1. The statements
therein are interesting, to say the least. And, for such
future purposes as you may have for checking the Readings
with known characteristics and qualities in this present
existence, I am taking the liberty of commenting more or less
briefly upon what you said, and what I happen to know about
myself.
This information may be of assistance to you in other ways.
First: You say I should have been a musician. That is
absolutely true. I should have been a pianist. Music has
ever been my solace and comfort. During the last thirty
years I have heard almost all the great operas, some of them
several times. The great opera "AIDA", with its Egyptian
background and mystical settings, has appealed to me most.
Strange it may be or not, but when I start anywhere or am on
the border of trouble, I always sing, whistle, hum, the solo
aria "Den Abendstern" (the song of the weary Pilgrim to the
evening star from "TANNHAUSER". That song, with Cardinal
Newmann's hymn, "LEAD, KINDLY LIGHT", has gone almost around
the world with me. I have spent more money in amusing myself
by listening to good music than in any other way. Yes, you
are right: I should have been a musician.
Second: The placing me as an aide to Washington in the
Revolution does not surprise me at all. That is exactly
where I would have desired to be. It may also account for
the great interest I have been taking of late in the writing
of military history. Particularly bitter has been some of my
comment on the importation of Prussian military methods and
ideals by Steuben, then one of Washington's generals. And,
believe it or not, my critical condemnation of those Prussian
principles will be the one thing most likely to cause some
one to put a prompt end to my present existence, once my book
is published.
But I just can't get the idea behind "material
discouragement, mental aberrations, and spiritual
abandonments" (page
2-3) [Par. 16] for I can't imagine
myself being stopped from doing what I thought to be the
right thing to do. By the way, you might keep that element
in my nature to the fore, and see what action will be taken
by some one to stop me: may I suggest an encounter with the
modern entity of Steuben? Interesting possibilities?
Your placing me at Jerusalem at the beginning of the
Christian era, again, is perfectly correct. Had I any choice
in the matter, that is precisely where I would have liked
most to be - in any capacity. In recent years I have made a
careful and painstaking inspection of the various visible
sections of various places in Palestine, and ever so often
find myself looking at some place that in some unaccountable
manner seemed familiar to me. The same feeling went with me
when I went to a number of places in the eastern
Mediterranean areas. You mention Atioch, Rome, and other
places where I was active. Quite likely. I have walked over
some of those Lebanon hills - toward Antioch, Aleppo, Homs,
and in Baalbek above all other places - and sensed that I had
seen all that before. I would not be surprised to learn that
I was no small official in the land of HUR (remember Lew
Wallace's great story "Ben Hur"?). I walked out over the
Appian Way, near Rome, past the "Quo Vadis" Church, and felt
that I was on familiar territory. I spent much time in and
around Rome, and environs, and wasn't at all surprised. And
you would not have surprised me at all had you told me I was
a high commander in the Roman forces, for I can almost sense
myself directing the construction of the defenses of DOURA,
the farthest east outpost of the Roman empire.
Your placing me at the Court of King Solomon would be
absolutely correct, for I haven't the slightest doubt that I
was just that. But I'm tempted to think I was more than just
a "musician" (page 3) [Par. 22, 23] for I have been too
deeply interested I Freemasonry, which was a most powerful
influence in Solomon's time, for me not to have been a high
ranking member: just as I am today. For your records, not
this well. A few years ago I received the very unusual
distinction of sitting in the Grand East as a visiting Grand
Lodge official, in the lineal descendant of King Solomon's
own lodge, in Jerusalem. I regard that incident as the high
light of my present life.
The other experience, i.e., leaving Atlantis, and travelling
to other western areas, to Arizona, etc., is not surprising
either. I have travelled a great deal over this world, and
certainly do like that great open southwest. Shall go there
again some day.
I am greatly encouraged by your statements that have the
"ability to think, to plan, and to direct". Well, that is
what I did in the World War, and still believe I can do a
creditable job of it. But my best work in that catastrophic
affair was along constructive lines, and, if I may say so, my
work was one of the few creditable and sound activities that
came out of that war. I led the American delegation of
Masons in the formation of Liberation Number 8, Lodge of
Masons, and that in due time developed into that great club
at Geneva, by means of which some 30,000 of the intellectual
people of central Europe were removed from the clutching
hands of Hitler and Mussolini. That, dear Dr. Cayce, is my
contribution to this present troubled world. Of those of us
who started that work, in 1917, just two are now alive, so
far as I know - myself, and Sir Arthur Nicholson. That
organization is now driven underground, but, as my first
question indicates, there is no doubt but that it will become
effective again. I should be so pleased if I could again
play a role in the re-birth - shall I say? - of that work.
I am in hearty agreement with you that "one who cannot get
angry is of little worth". Make no mistake about it, I can
get mad, but not often do I let it be shown. That may be the
phase of your statement that puzzles me. When I get real
mad, it stays. But if by "control" you mean not let it be
very noticeable, that I try to do. Being an old army
Quartermaster the matter of control of temper is an absolute
essential. But if you mean mad at some condition or phase of
life, you bet I can get mad; in fact I stay mad a long, long
time. For instance, I've been mad as blazes at Prussian
military methods in the army for thirty years, and will stay
mad about it. High army officials have shown sharp
repressive measures under which I have been forced to bend
and accede in some respects, but not in the least did that
affect my hatred of the system.
In the matter of truth and loyalty (page 4) [Par. 32], that
happens to be the phase of my life that I am proudest about,
and have suffered the most for. Both those qualities have
cost me terribly dear, but if I had to go back over life
again, I'd do precisely the same. Were it not so, I never
would have attained high Masonic degrees and honors. The
records given you should have made mention of the very great
many times I have given aid and assistance to others to the
best of my ability, and many times never allowed the receiver
to know where the aid came from. Those are things I never
tell.
I shall soon be returning back to New York, and elsewhere,
and shall hope to meet you in person sometime. I'll write
you later, give you an address where you may contact me, and
shall hope we will find our ways crossing sometime. In the
meantime, please accept my best personal regards, with many
thanks.
Sincerely yours, [
2576]
9/03/41 See Dr. [
2067]'s letter under
2067-8 Reports in re
Major [
2576].
1/20/42 EC's letter to Mrs. Julia Chandler regarding several
people who went to her with their readings to be interpreted
[including Major [
2576], who apparently had also visited EC
while he was in N.Y. in November 1941]:
"Major [
2576] - well, don't know. Have a very unpleasant
feeling there, though hope am all wrong about it all. Am
sure I am too self-conscious about some people, and wonder
why - think will have to try and take myself apart and
psychoanalyze myself."
1/23/42 Mrs. Julia Chandler's reply: "At Dr. [
2067]'s
request I gave an hour last Sunday to Major [
2576]. I can
quite understand your not feeling very much drawn to him.
Neither do I. In fact, I am afraid I was rather bored by his
visit. I could not seem to get my teeth into just what his
concepts and purposes are. Confidentially, Dr. [
2067] is
thinking of marrying him. I say confidentially, although she
wrote it to me and did not ask me not to repeat it. However,
she may not want it known as she does not know when it can
be. I have no knowledge of her except through her letters."


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation