7/22/44 [
2946]'s letter:
I, too, looked over the Congress as critically as possible
hoping to turn up profitable ideas for next year. One who
has attended only two Congresses hesitates to express an
opinion. But if I'm any use at all I have to use such
judgement as I have and you can scan my reactions for
possible help and discard everything which does not fit.
It seems to me that your Congress is something distinct from
other conferences of a religious nature. You have direct
access to the Father's leading just as any conference
leader hopes to have; I mean the access through prayer
and meditation. But then you also have this extra-sensory
pathway which no one else I know of can offer. You are
bound to draw an increasing number of persons interested in
religious living because they will want all the kinds of help
available. But you will also have persons with scientific
interest - doctors, psychologists, persons with problems to
work out under the direction of the readings. This group may
or may not be religious; many of them are not. Then there
is a third group of those interested in astrology, theosophy
and escatological problems. Altogether your group lacks the
homogeneity that one expects in an average conference. And
that difference makes it more difficult to plan a profitable
week's study.
One thing I feel is profitable to everyone and that is your
talks. All who come, whether or not they realize they have
religious interest, are interested in you and in whatever you
consider to be the source of your power. Therefore it seems
to me you should talk to the entire group at some time during
the first day, preferably that first evening. Each person
needs to oriented to you and to your background. Each one
needs to feel personally acquainted with you. This year I
felt we should have had more of you. Some persons went away
without knowing what you felt the work of the Association
to be and without feeling a place for themselves to fit in.
To be sure, different ones told them in a general way but
I think a strong talk by you on the first night would be a
great help.
[Marginalia:] Seem to me you should speak once each day if
you possibly can.
It also seemed to me that the complete purpose of the
Association should be made plain early in the week. So many
of those present had no understanding of the Association
itself. Maybe a couple paragraphs from the constitution
could be read and elaborated. But in order to make the
Association plain and clear to others I think you have to
decide in your own mind what parts of the plan expressed in
the constitution merit your approval. You can't get across
anything you don't agree to yourself.
Not only is the group likely to become larger but you may
have an increasing number of thoughtful persons - on the
order of Mr. Johnson. If so, the others who have a part on
the program with you should be better people. Charm isn't
enough! For instance that very pretty young woman from
Philadelphia - I cannot recall her name at the moment but she
is a member of the Board. She gave a long talk with charts -
remember? Well, that material came out of a book which many
present had read and knew quite as much about as she did.
That sort of lecture could be given by someone who has
already made a place in the field and not by an amateur. For
a small group of beginners, her talk would make a pleasant
evening. But it was too involved for a mixed group many
of whom had no background and many of whom had much more
background than she. It takes more than a chart to make
a clear talk. I just wonder what Hugh Lynn would think of
getting someone really good in that field to make two or
three talks. It seems to me that what you yourself have and
do is so good that you do yourself and the Association an
injustice to use anything but the best in each phase of the
work.
There are people who know the general field of extra-sensory
perception. In fact there are half a dozen books which would
make corking book reviews in the hands of capable people. It
seems too bad to have the best demonstration in the country
right there and not to have some advanced and authoritative
data available.
If the crowd is going to grow, then it seemed to me we ought
to plan to have more persons definitely assigned to make them
feel at home, to explain the source material available, to
talk over problems. Harmon covered quite a bit of territory
in getting acquainted but he was a newcomer himself. I spent
as much time as possible at the Essex House but I wish now
I had stayed there because several fine people had personal
problems and questions about the Association which someone
should have been on hand to answer. It seems to me the
literature table should have someone always in charge,
ready to answer questions.
A good many people mentioned the absence of music. Maybe
you recall that a year ago there was a little group singing.
I believe the Seays felt that was a move in the right
direction. We could have a good deal of group singing.
Nothing brings a group into one accord so surely and so
rapidly. I'm sorry now that we didn't get the little piano
when Mr. Seay suggested it; we could have put it in an office
and used it. Or someone like Harmon, who can make the chairs
want to sing, could do very well without an instrument. It
will be easier with a larger room but even in the present
quarters a lot could be done with group singing.
Miss Wynn was swell; everyone mentioned her appreciatively.
So was Miss Edmonds. The planned devotionals are a help all
the way down the line. There will always be grand persons
like those two to fill in and make a highly interesting
program. But two or three very good people in some
special line would add a lot of content.
Oh, well, we should worry. When Hugh Lynn comes back all
will be well. And maybe Tom Sugrue can be there next year
also. I am exceedingly eager to meet him. If I had known he
was chairman of publications I'd have had a lighter heart all
the time. About my largest hope for the Association, apart
form your own good health and Hugh Lynn's return, is the
desire to see the publications really put into his hands. I
just don't think he would have let that Essenes pamphlet,
for instance, see the light of print without some better
documentation. [GD's note: See her letter
2/22/44 in
2946-5
Reports, praising the same pamphlet.] Unfortunately there
are better things already in print on the Essenes and it
seems as if whatever comes out of the Association should
be as good as the best.
Publications are one thing I should like to have talked with
you about while I was there. But you were too busy for it.
There are a few first rate things on the publication list.
One book Hugh Lynn did, for instance, and the new one which
Harmon did on the physical readings. But there is also a
lot of poor stuff which gives an unfair picture of you and
of your work. I recall the arthritis pamphlet, for example.
What is there is good but the way it is put together makes
it sound like a patent medicine ad. The files are full of
stunning material on arthritis which could be added, at least
some of it, and a first rate pamphlet turned out. Something
really useful to doctors and laymen alike. If there is a
publications committee I do indeed wish they could spread
out the entire list of published material and decide what is
worth keeping and what could well be scraped and then go on
from there. Under Mr. Sugrue's direction there are several
of us who could lend a hand and turn out material you would
be proud of. He could keep the content material up to grade,
do the editing, and direct the kind of printing.
Oh, dear, I know that you are the truly important factor and
in a sense nothing else matters. But the readings themselves
have suggested a degree of research and publication, and even
suggested Mr. Sugrue to supervise, and a well planned program
would make the work AND YOU available to so many more people.
8/01/44 [
2946]'s letter:
Do I ever have a time getting ventriculin! Even an order
direct to Park Davis has not brought results yet. Dozens of
drug stores do not carry it. It seems that Park Davis got
out another concoction called VENTREX which is also made of
powdered pigs' stomach but put up in capsule form and most
doctors are now using that. Lily's also put up the same
thing in capsule form. Have the readings ever suggested
VENTREX? If someone should be told to take ventriculin
in the near future do you suppose Mrs. Cayce could ask
if ventrex would be a good substitute in case ventriculin
cannot be had? I want to follow the directions literally
but sometimes a fellow seems up a stump. This is not an
important question to have on your mind but it might be
held in the back of your mind. I use the little ice machine
affair daily and treasure that hour's meditation especially.
Once the points of the two attachments touched for an
instant; do you think that will do any damage? I try
to handle it as if it were made of gold.
It's a temptation to chat on but I have 30 pounds of cherries
to put up this morning. Wish you were here to lend your
expert advice!... Tell Miss Wynne to put a note in the
next WEEK'S READINGS about how you are.
Love to you all,
8/14/44 EC's letter:
I am surprised to know that you have had a hard time getting
ventriculin, but I suppose that all of those things change
about. And if Park Davis is now making Ventrex to take the
place of ventriculin, I don't think there would be anything
out of the way for you to use that and if it is in capsule
form, it makes it a much easier form than in the crystals or
in such large grains that it has to be dissolved. We will be
glad to keep that in mind and ask the question should we be
able to undertake it, but as yet I haven't done anything now
for practically three weeks. The way I feel this morning
it might be three weeks more. Though the way the people
are begging I may try again tomorrow.
All the rest here are doing very well. Though it isn't any
too well to have so many telling me what I ought to do.
I expect it would be real good for me to have thirty pounds
of cherries to put up. I think that if I could do something
else besides worry about trying to get in appointments for
people again it would help. I haven't undertaken to put up
anything though I have lots of peaches and grapes, but there
is nothing I can do about it right now.
Thanks a lot for letting us hear form you. Remember us to
[
5070] and [
3188], and all the rest who would care to hear
from us.
Lots of love from everyone, Edgar
8/14/44 [
2946]'s letter:
The other night I wondered if you'd had any other reading
which suggested taking enzymes instead of stilbestrol. Dr.
Musselman is much interested in the reading you gave me
because you said stilbestrol was no help and that is the
classic medicine these days for trouble such as I've had. We
wonder if any direct enzyme has been mentioned. I am taking
ventriculin which contains enzymes from the stomach, no
doubt. Also you said a fairly large dose of Vitamin E
would be useful. We wonder if the readings have ever
mentioned what E preparation to use and how large a dose.
don't take time to write a letter but if there is any
additional information we'd love to have a copy of it.
Hope the summer weather has not mowed you down - and that
Mrs. Cayce is getting along well. She surely did need rest
after that Congress. Seems a long time since we have had any
Cayce news - but I don't want you to use your energy to write
it, either.
A great deal of love to you all,
8/18/44 EC's letter:
Dear Mrs. [
2946]:
I have yours of the 14th, enclosing the letter from Mrs.
Ellis, of Los Angeles. It may be just as well that this has
been delayed so long, as it seems we are disappointing so may
people - I wonder?
We haven't gotten back to work, as yet. I wish I could have
been there, if the fishing was any good. Maybe such a rest
as that is what I need - or maybe I just need to be knocked
on the head and laid on a shelf a while. Anyway, it sounds
mighty good to a fellow who likes to fish as I do.
That conference sounds very interesting. I hope it works out
all right, and isn't too much of a hardship for you.
We have quite a number of readings where enzymes have been
indicated instead of stilbestrol - if we could just get them
together. I don't know anything about either one of them.
don't even know what they are! Why the information seems
to take an aversion to some compounds, I don't know; and why
it picks up some and gives them to people for a few weeks
or months and then never mentions them any more, I don't
understand. Usually, when we ask why, something has been
changed in the formula, or is not as good as it was, or
something equally as confusing. We realize that we know
so blooming little.
How is [
3188]? I haven't heard anything more from him. I
made a suggestion to him, but I don't know whether he thought
I was crazy, or whatnot. Tell him I would like to hear form
him, when you see or hear form him again.
We are all still keeping fairly busy, even though we are
not doing anything except trying to write to people and
make excuses for our own weaknesses, etc.
Thanks a lot, though, and with love from everyone.
Sincerely, Edgar Cayce EC:gp
12/21/44 [
2946]'s letter:
Dear Mr. Cayce,
Today right in the midst of a prayer I had an amusing thought
and laughed right out. I was wondering if you can tell when
people are praying for you and I thought how interesting it
would be if every effective prayer literally rang a bell.
The thing which made me laugh was thinking what a riot of
sound you would live in! I just wonder if any man in America
has more heartfelt prayer arising in his behalf. No doubt
more people SAY a prayer for the president of the United
States but those who pray for you do so with all their heart.
We have treasured every word from Gladys about you. It is
good to know you are home. The trip was difficult I'm sure
and the going will be slow. But it's a higher hill to climb
than any you've ever climbed before and from the height you
will be able to see a long way across the path of the stars.
To be a seer - a literal see-er - is a great calling. I have
a deep thrill thinking of you and of the insight which must
be rising within you these hard days.
For two weeks I've combed the town to find some little thing
which would give you and Mrs. Cayce joy. A book is always my
first choice but I wonder where you would get time to read.
A good apple comes a close second - especially along with the
book - but goodness knows what kind of diet you may be on.
Finally today I gave up and am enclosing a very small check
which I hope you will spend for some little thing you will
both enjoy. [...], I know, would run buy himself a new
record. And [...] would get a new hammer. But you may want
a few fish hooks. We shall be thinking of you on Christmas
Day. It is hard to make merry but a high and holy joy is
possible for us all. I just have to think what the darkness
would now be if Jesus had never come and shown us his
Father's will made manifest among us, to know how great
our Light really is.
As the newscasts pour in with their tale of carnage and
disaster it sometimes seems as if we cannot stand one more
night of it. And then again I feel that we have to go on -
a good deal as a poor little chick has to go on straining his
way out of the shell which shuts him from a larger measure
of reality. Isn't it Buddha who says, "I bring you sorrow
and the ending of sorrow"? Through sorrow to peace and
understanding. I hope the star's own message will fill
your heart during these next days.
4/06/77 GD's note: Mrs. [
2946], according to report of
her granddaughter, oldest daughter of son [
3188], died in
February 1977, after an illness since September 1976 when
she discovered she had cancer of the intestines and liver.
[Surgery was not performed - sewed her back up.] Her passing
was easy and she suffered less than would be expected with an
illness of that nature.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation