11/23/76 [
2962]'s wife replied regarding 2962-1:
"...I am most impressed by your prompt acknowledgement of
receipt of the materials I sent to Mr. Slater, and your
interest in following through.
"Although I will answer the questions put to me to the best
of my ability, you should be aware of a few items that might
in some manner be considered as you add these answers to your
files. First of all, I did not know my husband at the time
of the reading - we married in 1948 and the reading was in
1943. Secondly, I have always been slightly troubled that
perhaps, either knowingly or unwittingly, Mrs. [
2174] might
have mentioned something about [
2962]'s personality, or his
work, which somehow Mr. Cayce unconsciously recalled. And
now I learn that his secretary had also met [
2962].
"I was troubled only because of two right on-the-mark
comments in the reading: P. 1, PAR. 3 [PAR. 4]: which was
clearly so to anyone who had spent any time with him. P. 4,
PAR. 11 [PAR. 32]: He was a television director later, in
the United States, and had done some radio broadcasting in
London during the war. He was intensely interested in all
visual media, and had moved from an interest in theater
to film and television. This was not just a way to make
a living to him but was his prime interest.
"Having said that, let me proceed: "P. 1, PAR. 3; P. 2,
PAR.'S 1, 2 [PAR. 4--6]: [
2962] was not particularly shy but
often appeared so because of his seeming to be withdrawn.
Before we were married, when we were both involved in working
at the same television station, I had been told by a salesman
- [
2962] was program director - that [
2962] sometimes
appeared not to be paying attention when he was trying to
discuss a business matter with him. I mentioned this as
tactfully as I could, in the hope that [
2962] would perhaps
change his behavior. Although we laughed about it, he
insisted that he could think of more than one thing at a
time, and that he was indeed paying attention even when
he seemed not to be. My own opinion is that he was much
more absorbed in his private thoughts - usually to do with
creative aspects of working on a script or something of that
nature - than in the routine of his day, and that he ofte
was guilty of what he was being accused of. But he was
not indifferent. He was, if anything, one of the most
considerate people I have ever known.
"P. 2, PAR. 3 [PAR. 7]: Very good at puzzles and
mathematical problems. (Our one son has inherited this to an
even greater degree. The other has inherited the interest in
the creative arts.) Don't know whether he was ever bored by
such things.
"P. 2, PAR. 4 [PAR. 8]: Most interested in the matters
mentioned here always.
"P. 2, PAR. 6 [PAR. 10]: Great ability in mechanical things.
One comment by a cameraman with whom he worked has always
meant a great deal to me. He said [
2962] asks us to do the
impossible, and then shows us how to do it.'
"P. 3, PAR. 3, 4 [PAR. 16, 17]: Can only repeat that he
was fascinated by the communications media and dedicated
to working in that field.
"P. 3, PAR. 8 [PAR. 21]: I confess to being somewhat unclear
as to the meaning or drift of this passage so I cannot be
helpful. I do know that I was the second wife of [
2962], who
had been brought up in an upper middle class English family,
yet both wives were of Jewish extraction. So, perhaps there
was a prior life and perhaps it was lived with and among the
children of Israel.
"P. 4, PAR. 8 [PAR. 29]: Repeats the strong interest in the
mechanical and in communications. And I repeat that this was
very true; goes for paragraph 11 [Par. 32] also.
"My husband was a most remarkable person and died all
too soon. But I consider myself privileged to have had
the opportunity to have learned from him some important
truths about goodness and sensitivity. And I had the rare
satisfaction of knowing that I had made the twelve years
of our life together something important for him, too. My
outgoing nature somehow helped him to open himself up more,
so that by the end of his life, he had come to terms with
many of the unhappy earlier episodes in his life, had
returned to England, where he had spent his youth, and found
that he could, in fact, find much to enjoy there. For him
I have two regrets: That he could not have lived to see his
two beautiful and gifted sons grow up, and that he did not
achieve all the goals he had set for himself professionally.
For us, his family, I have the comfort of knowing how much he
left with us, but I am so sorry that my sons had to grow up
without his presence; he died when there were ten and six.
He was 53.
"Many thanks for your interest. Do keep me on your mailing
list..."


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation