7/28/43 [
3037]'s letter to GD:
Dear Gladys,
I'm so pleased at your friendliness in using first names - I
also had the urge to do so immediately.
Of course it would be gratifying to me if my little poems or
anything else I have written could seem worthy of your
publication. To be quite frank, the novelty of having anyone
take an interest in my 'thought expressions' would be such as
to give me a very real thrill; for as I have already told
you, my family and friends are entirely unsympathetic with
abstract exploration. For my part, I never cease to wonder
at the contradiction they support, i.e. though the concrete
things they value above all else crumble and disintegrate
before their very eyes, they still hold to them as being
superior in value to things of the spirit - which, though
truly real and everlasting, are much more difficult for
impatient humans to grasp hold of.
However, since becoming better acquainted with my
astrological horoscope I have learned to accept this
particular incompatibility - as explained by the major
aspect in my chart; Mercury (Mind) in Scorpio (occult &
hidden things) in my 10th House of Profession, Ambition, &
Native's Major Urge - BUT SQUARE in ASPECT to Jupiter my
Ruling Planet, (fortune, success, happiness) which resides
in my 7th House of Marriage, where I had the sign Leo,
(children, entertainment, romance). This explains very
clearly why my deepest urge is to explore the unseen, and
attempt to bring it out into the open, but that all of this
is entirely at cross-purposes to the dominant position of my
sun-sign's ruler, Jupiter, which is so beneficially placed in
the house of marriage for me, stressing all of the activities
and pleasures denoted by such a partnership! It is truly a
constant combat between forces!
Although Astrology has always given me the understanding of
'what' we all are like, it was only when my 'Reading' gave
me a deeper and more personal understanding of Reincarnation
that I came to comprehend 'why' we are so. I am so deeply
grateful for this new understanding which has helped me to
better interpret the whole cosmic puzzle.
I shall send to you my paper on the Time Dimension as soon
as I can copy it off. Please understand It is merely my
humble explanation - not to intellectuals who could express
it much better than I - but only to those who (from lack of
personal experience, or lack of thought on the subject) are
persistently stumped in their comprehension of existence
other than 'material' due to the common ignorance of Time
being merely a dimensional limit to material life, such as
is Space!
My family say that only a few intellectuals even pretend to
understand the 4th dimension, so that I can't possible
comprehend it. But I do - and everyone can, if not by
personal experience with precognitive dreams etc., which
began my understanding, then by reading such books as Dunne's
"Experiments with Time".
The reason I wish the average person also could understand
this clearly is that the puzzling questions in their groping
minds would then mostly be answered by the presence of a
correct estimation of Time and Space. The important point
to be proved being that the real life, or spiritual
existence, is impervious to Time and therefore death, as in
contrast to our material existence, but also to prove that
there IS an existence outside the limits of Time and Space.
This truth is completely substantiated by the Readings, of
course, but to the average person I still contend that a new
and precise understanding of how RELATIVE Time and Space are
in the Cosmic scheme is necessary before spiritual skepticism
will be wiped away. Although it may seem bold for an amateur
like myself to attempt any part of such a job, still it is
true that those who need understanding the most, ordinarily
don't comprehend clearly the language of 'the intellectuals'
and so in self defense will scorn it all!
I appreciate your thoughtfulness in suggesting names of those
I might find it interesting to correspond with. Although I
have not as yet done so, it is only due to lack of proper
time and concentration; you see, the moments when I can find
privacy for my 'private thinking' come very seldom these
vacation days, for my cottage here is full of noisy children
most of the time. They are at an age when to be constantly
doing something is of supreme importance, and I find it
unwise to seclude myself from their moods in favor of my own.
I'm looking forward to the Congress Booklet; please let me
know what fee I owe for it. All of the literature I have
received so far from you has interested and helped me
greatly; I don't want to miss any of it, please.
How I have rambled on with this letter - it just proves that
you need to hardly know a person at all, in the formal sense
of that word, to feel akin to someone right from the start.
I realize that you have a great deal of letter-writing which
keeps you very busy, but I do hope you will find time to
continue our correspondence. I wish I knew more about you
and your life - I am always so interested in how other
people arrive at their particular awareness!
Yours sincerely, [
3037]
[Enclosure with letter above]
WHAT IS TIME?
[by [
3037]]
Time, contrary to common presumption, does not 'fly' nor
does it 'pass by quickly or slowly' and the truth is surely
misconstrued when we say 'Time and tide wait for no man' -
but rather we might complain that so far Man has not found
it possible to stay HIS own inevitable movement THROUGH Time.
Man, physiologically, is in a perpetual growing motion called
'being alive' and this physiological movement is measured for
its spatial existence or age by a man-made plan we call Time.
This Time plan is merely a theoretical convenience,
conceived in order to measure the space of Man's movement
(both physiological and physical) through this material, and
therefore dimensionally limited, existence.
Thus Time is an abstract copy of a vast yet motionless
yardstick, reaching endlessly into spatial existence, as a
method of measuring our real dimension of physiological
space - a dimension each existing thing acquires by the very
act of existing through what we call Time, but which is more
accurately called Space.
Consequently, Time and Space are essential partners,
incorporated by their interdependence. Hence, in further
reference to either the proper title to be used is
Spatial-time. Though their meanings are paralleled in usage
they are distinguishable in character. Space may be likened
to an endless bolt of tapestry cloth picturing all material
existence, while Time is merely the dimensional measurement
of all that cloth.
Then the Past, Present, and Future are just imaginary points
on this imaginary yardstick. To say what point in Time is
which is a purely relative matter, depending on whether or
not one is in motion and in what direction. 'Now' is your
Present - it is your ancestors' Future - and your
descendants' Past! Do you realize that it is only the
directional quality of our Physiological Time-space dimension
which divorces our Past from our Future? Then imagine a
state of consciousness free from our physiological
properties, i.e. our material bodies, (such as after 'death')
and you'll find that Past and Future are meaningless terms;
in fact, such a state can't be said to involve Time at all if
Time is but a term of measurement for physiological spatial
existence!
All of this shows Time to be not only an abstract term,
useful on our material plane alone, but a confining term as
well, for does it not prejudice our conception of the
so-called Past and Future, not allowing them credit for the
quality of permanence they truly possess? Isn't it only that
ghost we call Time which marks off the Present as the only
space existing. Without this abstract measurement would not
all space - Past, Present, and Future, - be one timeless
space?
But the directional quality of material life and growth
calls for such a measure to parallel its progress and to fit
its limitations. Thus, we lose sight of the forest being too
close to the trees - which is to say that we fail to
recognize the unity of spatial-time in material existence,
being marked off as we are by Time itself into seemingly
un-unified spaces called the Present.
Now supposing the Time plan had not been conceived for our
convenience, and the terms past, present, and future, and
seconds, minutes, and hours were completely erased from our
knowledge - then the spatial existence of anything would be
one whole unbroken unit or dimension, measured by nothing but
creation and termination. But because Time is so
conveniently applicable to our physiological progress, this
dimension is named the Time dimension to distinguish it from
other spatial dimensions.
Were it possible for one of us to 'arrest' the motion of
our own physiological train, shooting through Spatial-time,
long enough to watch from any 'station' en route the flight
of any other physiological train as it completely appears
and disappears, (that is, the physiological existence of
anything as one whole unit) the result of this unique
observation would be 'seeing' the Time dimension of that
existing thing!
For just as your physical self would have to get off from a
moving train to actually see that train's spatial dimensions
in relation to other existence, so we would have to step out
of our own physiological motion in order to glimpse that
dimension of Time in other physiological existence. If a
physiologically dead person could just 'look' at an existing
object, that 'look' would capture the fourth dimension of the
object viewed; for the Time dimension can spread into view
only in contrast to the absolute halt or stoppage of Time for
the observer.
Perhaps at 'death' when one's physiological growth is
slackening into stoppage the dimension of spatial-time might
possibly be glimpsed. It is said that a person dying 'sees'
his whole life roll before his mind's eye. It is natural to
believe it is the separation from the train of his
physiological growth which places him in the role of the
observer of that train fleetingly.
What we think of as the Future is ever existent in
Spatial-time, we merely have not reached it as yet materially
because the space of physiological growth intervenes. It is
similar to saying that though an actual train we might be
traveling to Texas on hasn't reached there yet, Texas is none
the less existent. The only difference separating any points
from the point of arrival is Space, (Time being merely the
theoretical measurement of such space). So we may say that
the Past and Future are ever existent, as Spatial-time we are
growing away from or growing towards, but the perpetual
motion of our physiological trains keep them ever divorced
from our Present.
Spiritually, however, there is no such obstacle as
physiological directional growth separating one point from
another, and thus no restricting Time element!
Here is material life, some minds are capable of overcoming
the normal restrictions of Spatial-time during infrequent
spells of apparent physiological hesitation - as in true
visions and precognitive dreams - and leaping into our future
spatial-time. This also argues for the existence of our
Future before we arrive there, but though we may say it is
ever existent it would be false to say ever present, for the
physiological motion of all living things keeps a space of
time (or a time of space) between the present moment and
existent future moments.
Now if you're thinking 'where' are these Future moments,
well - 'where' is this Present moment which you accept as
existent? If any moment, either past, present or future,
is in reality just measured spatial existence (the word
'moment' being a child of the Time illusion remember) then
all Time is all Space, and Future moments are merely the
spatial existence we have not as yet grown into
physiologically!...(If the word Physiological appears to be
over-used here, let it be understood that the word applies
better than any other single term to the very essence of what
we mean by the fourth dimension, or Spatial-time.)
But to say that future spatial-time is ever existent is not
a point for fatalists; it merely means to say the 'cloth'
wherewith to clothe our destinies is flung out generously
before us, but the harmony of line and color is in the
precious use of our own individual free will.
Conceiving of a state of spiritual consciousness - when
once our dear, dull bodies are laid to rest and directional
growth is physiologically halted - it would appear from all
of this that such a state will afford relation to our
so-called Past (in its spiritual state, naturally not its
material state!) by virtue of the absence of the Time
illusion.
But if you contend that perhaps Space, if not Time, will
restrict the spiritual consciousness to a certain point in
Space, consider this: - Time was conceived by Man to
measure existence in Space, but Space is only conceived by
us in relation and contrast to the existence of matter. Take
away all matter - return it to its spiritual state from
whence it came - and the term Space becomes as illusory as
Time. Therefore, Spatial-time is only a material dimension,
and is an illusion and limitation of the world of matter.
11/30/43 She obtained a Physical Reading for her husband,
Mr. [
3434].
6/11/44 [
3037]'s letter to GD:
Dear Gladys;
I was reminded by one of the Bulletins to contribute my
ultimate opinion of the influence and benefit received from
a Life Reading.
First of all, it has to sink into my consciousness over a
period of time before I recognized the simplicity of its
truth. I suppose most of us tend to glamourize all forms of
discovery, and Truth, being the most valuable discovery of
all, often escapes our recognition by its unglamorous dress
in every-day phrases.
However, recognition took hold as I learned from day to day
to discard the glamour in which my thoughts and desires and
hopes had habitually been clad, and - when thus bared of
selfish camouflage - know them more truly and recognize their
analysis and interpretation as given in the Reading.
Of course I've always been aware of my faults, but to have
those shortcomings (impatience with loved one and intolerance
of others' opinions) presented to me in a Life Reading as
'pieces mislaid from the Jigsaw Puzzle of Life' just
naturally fires my ambition to set right those pieces - in
other words, the Reading is helping me to see what the 'Game'
is all about, and how it should be played!
There is no enterprise more entrancing to the progressive
mind of man than that of putting together parts to make a
whole; and I declare that a Life Reading is a useful
blueprint to go by.
I wish to become an Active Member rather than an Associate
Member, and so I enclose the extra fifteen dollars. However,
how can I be a really active member without taking a more
active part than that of a local propagandist? Is there any
work I can do at such a distance?
My best wishes to you and the Cayces,
Sincerely, [
3037]
7/22/44 She obtained a Life Reading for her daughter, [
5359].
7/60 GD's note: To this date Mrs. [
3037] has remained an
active participant in A.R.E. work.
7/09/70 She wrote: "A Prayer Fellowship (inspired by A Search
for God) has met in my home every Thurs. a.m. for 16 yrs!
Just can't keep up so many memberships now that I am a widow.
Have always hoped to attend a Seminar at Va. Beach, but
family affairs always keep me close to home."
1/08/79 [
3037] wrote, requesting a copy of her Life Reading.
1/09/79 A copy of her Life Reading was sent to her, asking
for her report on it. She was also given a complimentary
Associate Membership to the A.R.E.


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation