6/12/43 Miss [
3127]'s ltr. to EC:
Dear Mr. Cayce,
It will be most satisfactory to me to have my Reading on
July 12 from 10:30 to 11:30 E.W.T. Thank you so very much
for your consideration. I will be at my home that morning
- at ..., Long Island, New York.
I am enclosing a brief history of my asthmatic case and also
of three allied conditions - hay fever and sinus - both of
long duration established in childhood, and teeth decay
developed since the onset of asthma. It is felt that
either or both the hay fever and sinus have an important
bearing on the asthmatic condition.
I trust that the enclosed questions are not out of order.
Their answers will prove of great aid, I am certain.
With hopeful expectations and a deep appreciation for having
been presented with your wonderful Work, I am
Sincerely, [
3127]
ASTHMATIC HISTORY
History of Hay Fever. Now in its 15th year - commenced when
I was 12 years old. After 8 years duration it became greatly
minimized. Disappeared almost completely with onset of
asthma, and remained so for 5 years. Has revived somewhat
this year.
History of Chronic Catarrah. Developed in early childhood
and later developed into chronic sinus condition. Treated
through various channels including electro-coagulation -
just prior to onset of asthma.
History of Asthma. Began 5 years ago when I was 21 1/2 years
old. At the time I was a sophomore in a Southern college.
Symptoms developed shortly after severe cold - and
electro-coagulation treatment of nasal passages. Bronchitis
developed and asthma followed shortly after along with
brain fag and a general nervous breakdown, with three months
I lost 50 pounds.
A critical condition ensued for the greater part of two
years during which time I had 5 hospitalization periods
ranging from 2 weeks to 4 months. During this period
the attacks were the most severe, sometimes ending in
convulsions.
All manner of drugs and inhalants etc. both of proven worth
and in experimental stages were administered in varying
degrees of potency. Only the very strongest reacted - mainly
heart stimulants. Considerable work was done on the sinuses
during this period including opening of antrums, ultra violet
ray, argyrol packs, short wave and copper ionization
treatments. Without provocation the condition would improve
and similarly without provocation relapses occurred.
Temperature, climate, location, all appeared equally
ineffective in easing or disturbing the conditions.
In the third and fourth years there was a very gradual
improvement - apparently now at a standstill since last
year.
Continuously, up until the present time I have been through
the mill with a great number of physicians and specialists
under all manner of treatments, always resulting in the
same conclusions: - no clue to any definite cause has
been discovered. All the known drugs used in the treatment
of asthma have been administered. Many of these drugs had
no reaction whatsoever. Some caused a slight reaction, and
even improved conditions for a time, but a continuation or
a renewal of any of these drugs eventually resulted in little
or no reaction - and proved of no benefit.
For the past two years I have been able to go to business and
to lead a fairly normal life. In fact, I have showed great
endurance along athletic lines at times, but I have no time
been completely free from asthma since its onset. It is
present continuously day and night, during all seasons, under
varying conditions. I live on synthetic adrenalin spray,
using it at least once every 12 hours and rarely less
frequently than 3 times in 12 hours, always increasingly
at night. At present I average 14 to 16 times in 24 hours.
Periodically this spray becomes ineffective and at these
times I have to resort to injections.
At one time during a not too critical session I had a
month of Christian Science under a man practitioner who
was unusually efficient in his understanding and application
of principles of his teachings. At all times during this
month I was under the supervision of a Christian Science
nurse. There was a temporary improvement for about two
weeks, and then as usual, the regular relapse. The last
two weeks became a nightmare to me because of the complete
withholding of palliatives which brought increased suffering
until it became past endurance.
I have presented a baffling case to the doctors because of
my complete disregard for the established medical theories
pertaining to asthma. I appear to set my own standards and
even then often fail to abide by them just as I do the
established theories. Each doctor in turn has dismissed
me having treated me to the extent of his knowledge of
asthma.
Apparently in connection with the asthmatic condition a
very serious problem has arisen with my teeth. Decay is
spreading rapidly and severely, and the centers of the
teeth have turned to a pulpy material which fails to stand
up under dental attention.
QUESTIONS
1. What are the causes of my asthma - physical,
psychological, nervous, etc.
2. What are the present contributing factors, if any,
arising since the onset of asthma; or, what factors
present at the onset of the asthma have only lately
become aggravations.
3. What connection is there between either or both my hay
fever and sinuses, with my asthma. What can be done to
correct these?
4. What effect has the illness or the medications had upon
the present condition of the teeth and what can be done to
counteract further decay.
5. What are the climatic effects on my asthma; is it
advisable to change my climate, and if so, whereto.
6. What is the cause of the inconsistent reaction to
medications e.g. a satisfactory and beneficial reaction
from a drug at one time, and little or no reaction or
benefit from any drugs administered at a later date;
or after continued use of any drug.
7/12/43 Brief by Phyllis Goodall, R.N.:
CONDITION OF CHRONIC ASTHMA
3127-1 Female, - 26 years - (long history
of allergic conditions)
SUMMARY of patient's history and MEDICAL TREATMENT:
Chronic catarrh developed in early childhood.
Chronic sinus condition followed. Fifteen years ago, at age
of 11, onset of HAY FEVER (no information as to treatment
at this time). At age of 21 the hay fever subsided. The
patient became ill with bronchitis which was followed by
asthma, and a general nervous breakdown. Duration 2 years
in which time she was confined to hospital five times for
periods ranging from 2 weeks to 4 months, at which times
all manner of drugs and inhalants, both known and
experimental for this condition, were administered.
Sinuses were drained several times, etc. and there was
a very gradual improvement in 3rd and 4th year which has
since stopped and now patient is never free of asthma.
She lives by using a synthetic adrenalin spray 3 to 4
times daily. [See rest of brief in 3127-1, Par. R1.]
REPORTS
7/12/43 Brief by Phyllis Goodall, R.N. [continued from
3127-1, Par. B2]:
CONDITION OF CHRONIC ASTHMA
3127-1 Female, 26 years - (long history
of allergic conditions)
SUMMARY OF READING
Disturbance: There are expansions in the bronchi and
trachea of this body that cause a spasmodic or asthmatic
reaction to the breathing or to the activity of the arteries
that carry the blood into the lung area. These expansions
are the result of a hindrance in the connections of the
nerve forces in the upper dorsal and at the 4th cervical
which cause an oversupply of nerve energy to this particular
area. This hindrance here is caused by "burrs" as it were
on the segments (or cushions between the segments) in the
2nd and 3rd dorsal, and between the 3rd and 4th cervical.
There is a sympathetic involvement of heart, lungs, liver
and kidneys.
TREATMENT SUGGESTED BY READING
Series of osteopathic treatments to reduce spinal condition
- Atomidine gtts [drops] 1 in half glass of water before
breakfast and at bedtime. Avoid sweets. Avoid drafts.
California - a good climate and altitude for this condition.
Reading prescribed inhalant to be kept in a special container
(see 3127-1).
The use of sedatives is damaging, in this condition.
Increases the size of the heart which in turn cause a
variation in the circulation causing a further disturbance
to liver and lungs or to liver and kidneys, dependent upon
the tendency of the variation.
8/21/43 Miss Goodall's ltr. to GD:
Miss Davis:
Here are the two sample jobs of indexing. Look them over
- show them to Hugh Lynn and let me know if they meet with
approval or wherein changes are to be made. This is an
IMMENSE job and of PRIMARY importance if your files are
to really mean something of lasting value. I wish - oh,
I wish I lived in Va. Beach and could work daily on the
whole thing.
8/21/43 Letter by Phyllis Goodall, R.N.:
SUBURBAN HOSPITAL
BETHSEDA, MARYLAND
7653 Old Georgetown Road
Dear Miss Gladys:
I hope you will forgive me calling you thus familiarly but
you are in my heart as such a patient, understanding and
kindly person that I am unable and unwilling to be too
dreadfully formal when I address you.
Yesterday I got out my file on the Association's work and I
started to index conditions. Almost immediately I came upon
a situation that I think should be remedied. Practically
none of the Readings gives a name to the condition or
disease. Wouldn't it be well if, while the Reading is
being given, the questions were asked - "According to
medical understanding on this plane what name would this
condition be called?"
Such a question would make your files infinitely stronger
and more accurate in the classification of diseases. The
way it is now the name of the disease remains anyone's guess
for many diseases present similar symptoms and it is both
dangerous and erroneous to assume too much from the
conditions described in the Reading. In these many
Readings you have sent me, very few of those seeking
help have stated in so many words the DIAGNOSES THEIR
DOCTORS HAVE GIVEN THEM. This gives rise to a double
conflict. I am at once confronted with the dilemma of
how to classify the trouble. Certainly we know that many
times the medical man is quite mistaken in his diagnosis
and here, again, if the Reading verifies the diagnosis we
have the assurance that all is well.
Reading this over I wonder if I have made myself clear. For
the sake of all that Mr. Cayce's sons will do with this in
the long, long years ahead all these angles are extremely
important. Cures, when they are effected, must be associated
with what disease was overcome or they become more or less
impotent to help again because another person suffering
with the same diseases that was cured may present entirely
different symptoms or so many different symptoms that no one
recognizes it to be the same disease and therefore the right
cure might be passed by while many others that seemed to fit
the symptoms were tried. Furthermore, medical science, for
whom this great powerhouse of information is invaluable,
cannot benefit from these data unless they are classified
according to terms they understand. No matter how we look
at the thing it is all important that all Readings be
clarified as to what term medical science would give to
the condition in the light of present day medical knowledge.
Sometimes all this information is very clearly stated and
in such instances it is a pleasure to assemble and summarize
the essential information for then I feel that your files are
truly being built for a purpose that will serve the future
generations of sufferers no matter how long or far down the
vista of years the sons and grandsons of the Cayce clan seek
to help humanity.
Will you, then, be good enough to show this letter to
Mr. Cayce. I have not written it all to him because I
know how busy he is and this end of the work falls to you
and Hugh Lynn. I am most anxious that Hugh Lynn be asked
about this. I sent him a letter to the address he gave me
but I have had no reply.
With this letter I am enclosing two cases I have written up
- one is clearly stated from the information and shows
clearly what is being treated, etc. - the other is a case
that lacks information of the nature I have spoken of here
and is therefore purely a guesswork classification. Look
these over - let Mr. Hugh Lynn see them - are they as you
want them? Any suggestions?
Ordinarily, you would have several cases listed on the small
card - but since I am miles away I believe that you will be
wise to let me use a small and large card for each case, then
file all small cards pertaining to the same disease together.
On the small card, in addition to the case number and name of
disease I will enter briefly the character of the condition
of that particular case which will enable one to pick out
the cases that most closely resemble his own. Will this be
o.k.? If not just turn the cards, I am sending, over and
write up the cases as Hugh Lynn wants them and I will follow
through. Can I do more?
Please tell Mr. Cayce that I have not heard from the Carvers
- parents of the child in the newspaper cutting I sent
special yesterday. They will probably speak with their
doctor and, of course, he will pooh, pooh everything without
knowing what he is pooh, poohing! Well, one can only try
their best and that I have done. However, I may yet hear
from them.
I wanted to send you a gift for your goodness to me but I
am purposely waiting till I go to Chicago next month so that
I can get it from a place I have in mind there.
The enclosed cards are folded - because they are only samples
of what I am driving at. Naturally, when I do the card to be
filed I will mail them flat and keep them in good order.
Best wishes to you all.
Sincerely, [signed] Phyllis A. Goodall
P.S. This is Monday, - I did not get my summaries completed
on Saturday in time to mail this - hence the delay. No word
from the Carvers yet. P.A.G.
10/04/43 Dr. Geo. N. Coulter's letter in re [
3127]:
"The physical findings upon examination, are the same as the
findings in your reading. I have not been able so far to see
any X-rays of her chest but hope to soon. My diagnosis is
chronic bronchial Asthma. She has been treated 5 times and
shown no improvement. The condition is such that, I believe,
will have to extend over a long period of time to get
results. Treatment started Sept. 11, 1943."
2/17/44 [
3127]'s letter:
Dear Mr. Cayce:
I have been requested by my osteopath, Dr. George N. Coulter,
18 East 41st Street, N.Y.C., to apply for a check Reading
relative to my original Reading #11,900-C-A-1 [3127-1]
of July 12, 1943 pertaining to my asthmatic history.
He suggested I give you briefly the situation since the
time of the original Reading.
The Reading advocated treatment by an osteopath (Dr. Coulter
was particularly recommended) and several medications. The
latter I began immediately, and the treatments were begun
early in September.
I continued the treatments twice weekly for about two months
during which time I showed no improvement whatsoever. I
planned for a Florida vacation as a last resort to condition
myself for the oncoming Winter, and at this time, a week
after discontinuing the treatments, I rather suddenly showed
much improvement.
I maintained a very high peak for two weeks, the latter
week being spent in Florida. Then followed the usual slump
following every peak I have ever reached, although very
slight in comparison to my earlier condition. After a
period of several weeks I resumed my treatments, continuing
to the present time. For about six weeks I maintained this
new level. I considered the chest only in fair condition,
but I attributed to the treatments the first general
improvement shown since the onset of my illness: better
color, facial lines less strained, splendid appetite, gain
in weight, abundance of pep and better mental outlook.
Three weeks ago I began a steady decline and my chest now
appears to be as poor as it was last fall. Severe early
morning attacks respond to no treatment except heavy
injections, and a serious physical and mental strain
ensues for two or three hours. There has been an increasing
loss in weight, appetite etc.
There has been some indecision on my part as to whether I
should continue these treatments - whether I have gained
the maximum I can expect from them. My financial position
is very low as a result of continuous and heavy medical
expenses, and I cannot afford to continue treatments that
have lost their efficacy. Dr. Coulter feels I should
continue with him until we see what a check Reading suggests.
My work is seriously threatened by my decreasing physical
condition and should I not be able to continue my work, I
would necessarily have to forego my treatments. Where that
would leave me remains to be seen. Under the foregoing
circumstances, I would be very deeply indebted to you if
you could give me a check Reading just as soon as possible.
Until that comes through, I have nowhere to look for help
and encouragement.
I enclose a check for $10 which I understand covers a check
Reading.
Very sincerely,
2/29/44 Miss [
3127]'s ltr. to EC:
Dear Mr. Cayce:
I have consulted with Dr. Coulter and we feel the following
questions taken into consideration will be of considerable
assistance. (Re - Check Reading for March 8, 3:30 to 4:30
E.W.T.)
1. Has there been any improvement in the asthmatic condition?
2. What is causing the present slump, particularly in the
light of the recent improvement?
3. Should I continue the present osteopathic treatments, if
so for how long, and should there be any variation in the
treatments.
4. Is any other form of treatment advised?
I would like to note here that the Atomidine used as
recommended in my first Reading has helped considerably
to loosen the congestion in the chest, but the inhalant
recommended is far too weak. All through my illness one
of the outstanding characteristics has been my failure
to respond to any but the heaviest of medications.
May I thank you sincerely for your prompt response to my
appeal and I trust that the Check Reading may serve to
relieve my condition further.
Sincerely yours, Miss [
3127]
4/13/44 Miss [
3127]'s ltr. to EC:
Dear Mr. Cayce:
I am writing in reference to my Check Reading to be given
Saturday, April 22 from 10:30 to 11:30 A.M. E.W.T.
I am altering completely the questions presented for the
original date of my reading - March 15th, due to a complete
change in my physical condition since then. It occurred to
me that if you were aware of the changes it might influence
you in altering these new questions for purposes of more
satisfactory interpretation.
At the time of my original request for a Check Reading I was
in a critical condition following a 5 week downfall. This
period culminated in a severe attack of Grippe. During my
recuperative period the Asthmatic condition improved 90%
and appears to be holding.
1. How do you find my present asthmatic condition?
2. Has just the congestion disappeared or have also the
muscles causing the asthmatic spasms been improved?
3. To what do you attribute this improvement - a result of
the temperature run during the Grippe, a result of the
osteopathic treatments, or just what?
4. Do you feel it advisable to continue these osteopathic
treatments (several times when the chest caused the greatest
distress, the osteopath's findings were satisfactory, and not
proportionately bad in relation to the severe attacks I was
having), or would it be advisable to discontinue any
treatments for at least as long as my present excellent
health is maintained. Of necessity I have had no treatments
for three weeks.
5. What light, if any, can be thrown on the cause of the
serious condition prior to the Grippe attack (especially
after having been in splendid condition the early part of
the Winter).
I trust that you are now in much better health and able to
resume your wonderful and much needed work.
4/17/44 Miss [
3127]'s ltr. to EC:
Dear Mr. Cayce:
In my last letter confirming my Reading for Saturday, April
22, I failed to specify that I would be at home at the above
address during the time of the Reading.
As there has been a decided backslide in my condition since
my last letter, I felt I should let you know, since the
Reading can not now confirm the condition as presented then,
nor can it answer satisfactorily the questions based on the
then improved condition.
Most sincerely,
4/22/44 See
3127-2.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation