8/10/46 [
2998]'s letter:
Dr. Gina Cerminera,
c/o Association for Research and Enlightenment,
Virginia Beach, Virginia
Dear Gina:
It was so nice to hear from you and learn that you are also
interested in one of the case histories so close to my heart.
In answer to your question, I must ask that Mr. Cayce's
answer to question four has always puzzled me. I asked Hugh
Lynn to explain it to me and his explanation was in line with
your understanding of the answer as given. To be perfectly
frank, I did not know which person the reading was speaking
of when it referred to "the entity". Did it refer to me or
did it refer to [
3340]? This matter has never been clear
to me in light of the facts and my objective knowledge. A
question coming to my mind is could it have referred to my
subjective knowledge?
For a good many years, I have been interested in Gladstone's
life but not to any enthusiastic extent. Of course, through
general reading of English histry, I knew of him and admired
his work. About twelve years ago, I read "Disraeli" by Andre
Maurois. This book deals with the reign of Victoria, chiefly
from the standpoint of Disraeli's accomplishments, and
strongly romanticizes him at the expense of Gladstone.
Gladstone's role in English history is played down in this
book. This is the most readable work of this period that I
have run across, and yet, it fails to do justice to Gladstone
by making Disraeli the greatest figure of his age. I
became interested in these two men and got Somervell's book,
"Disraeli and Gladstone". I believe, prior to the time of
the Cayce reading, I knew more about Disraeli than I did
about Gladstone, although my sympathetic interest was with
Gladstone. From this little study, I would not consider "how
well the entity has studied that life" as a very accurate,
factual statement. I have always regretted that I was unable
to get in more questions on this point. Mr. Cayce himself
was not able to give me much help with this as he took the
same view that you and Hugh Lynn do. Of course, the great
riddle seems to be the degree of attraction through which
the forces seem to work in matters of this kind.
As to the accuracy of the readings, generally, and especially
regarding the traits of personality which it sets out,
I consider it extremely accurate. This also goes for
[
3346]'s reading and the comparisons made in it.
If you want any more specific questions answered, shoot them
to me.
I wish you every success with your work and if I can be of
any further help, please let me know.
Most sincerely, [
2998]
8/13/46 Gina Cerminara's letter to the father, [
2998]:
Dear [
2998]
Thank you for your very fine and helpful letter of August
10th with regard to the life reading of your son.
Yes, I would be rather inclined to believe that your interest
in Gladstone - even if not quite as intense as the reading
seems to imply - had been a factor in the attraction. It
makes such an interesting case that it's a temptation not
to believe it! When I write it up, however, I will let my
research conscience be my guide and present the facts as you
have given them impartially.
There's nothing else that I need to know at the moment, but
thanks for your assurance that I can call on you again if I
need to.
My very best wishes to you in all your undertakings.
Sincerely Yours, Gina Cerminara
See Source File Key #3340 for solar [astrological] chart
submitted by Dorothy Moore, in '73 or '74, re 3340-1.
11/03/75 He requested, and was sent on
11/11/75, a copy of the
reading.


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation