1/07/36 HLC's letter to [
914]:
I have your letter of December 9, before me along with copies
of the letters from Messrs. [
165], [
849] and [
270]. I regret
that I have not been able to take this matter up with you
before this time.
With reference to the question asked by [
165] as to our use
of the word economic, my feeling in the matter is that our
readings should not be devoted strictly to subjects under the
dictionary definition of this term. I feel that the readings
do interpret with remarkable accuracy the thought and trends
of feelings of masses of people and that such information
relative to our own nation and the effect on our policies of
foreign mass thinking would be most interesting and helpful.
It is possible also that such readings might give some
insight into the laws governing disturbances in natural
laws, such as storms, earthquakes, draughts, etc., as they
influence economic conditions. (There is every indication
from many psychic sources that 1936 will be a most eventful
year in this respect.) We might also consider discourses on
human relations relative to war - its causes and remedies -
approaching if necessary from the strictly economic factors.
Racial, social and political factors involved in the coming
world changes should not be neglected. Perhaps in simpler
words my idea would involve a series of readings interpreting
the unsettled conditions as approached from different angles
and discussions of the possible trends in the changes that
are definitely in progress the world over. I feel that
each reading should be limited to some particular angle of
approach and that questions be as definite and concrete as
possible.
As already indicated in my discussion with you and Mr. [
261],
I feel that you would be more capable of working up the
questions for the readings than I. We can, I am sure,
explain to Mr. [
270] this situation. I will gladly go over
the questions for each reading carefully and add such follow
up questions as may seem desirable during the course of any
reading.
As regards Mr. [
270]'s discussion of the method of handling
the readings, I would like to suggest that our arrangements
include if possible the arrangements for making some
practical application of the information obtained. Copies
of the readings should of course go to each member, but I
would like to see material from these readings collected and
presented, if necessary in carefully disguised form, not only
for members of the Association to discuss and think about,
but also to the public through popular magazines. It might
of course be necessary to cut much of the material received,
but I am sure much of it would be constructive and that
the committee should include in its plans means of getting
its findings before the public. The name of Edgar Cayce,
the Association, or member of the committee need not, of
course, be connected with such publication.
Members of the committee should, I believe, consider
contributing sufficient to meet the expenses of the readings
and also the slight increase in offices expenses involved in
the distribution of the readings. This would be governed by
the number of readings obtained over the period of a year. I
would consider four or six readings for the first year to be
about the proper number.
As you will understand I differ with Mr. [
270] in the purpose
of these readings. There will certainly be no need for
them unless they can be used to advantage to improve
either general or individual conditions. I consider the
contribution to better general thinking along such lines -
to be induced through publication of the material contained
- as being as important, or perhaps more important than the
benefits derived by the individual members of the committee
for personal understanding of conditions or practical
application.
I am writing to Mr. [
270] regarding your work as compiler of
the questions and also regarding the purpose of the readings
as a whole. A copy of this letter is inclosed.
I hope that our first reading will take place at an early
date. It will be necessary to "feel" our way in the
presentation of subjects and questions for the first reading
or so. A question in the first reading as to the best
approach might bring out something helpful, if the purpose
of these readings has been sufficiently agreed upon.
I am personally very interested in this phase of the work and
promise you that your correspondence will hereafter receive
more prompt attention.
Very truly yours, Hugh Lynn Cayce
Questions prepared that did not get asked: "In what other
ways besides those mentioned may this information be made
of value to individuals, groups and masses for constructive
purposes? Will you comment briefly on the general economic
conditions in each of the following countries and the trends
of mass thinking therein particularly as related to the
existing form of government of each such country: England,
France, Germany, Italy, Russia, Japan. Is the public
sentiment in any of these countries such that further wars
are likely in the near future? Is it probably that the
League of Nations can survive after its failure to prevent
or control the Italian Ethiopian conflict? Will the trend
toward nationalism in these countries continue or has it
approached its peak? Do these countries generally favor
increased international trade and if so are they willing to
take the necessary steps, monetary and otherwise to make such
trade possible? In the United States is the Democratic or
the Republican party gaining in followers? Which party now
stands the best chance of winning the November election? Do
the masses favor increased centralization of government or
decentralization? Do the masses favor increased or decreased
public spending? Do the masses favor a balancing of the
Federal budget? What is the ruling opinion concerning the
government's expenditures for the unemployed? Is it probable
that industry will gradually absorb all present unemployed,
or will there be a continuing unemployment problem that must
be met? Has the public generally any realization of the
ultimate effects of government deficits? Do the masses favor
amendments to the Constitution that would give increased
power to the Federal Government? Do the masses favor any
curtailment of the present powers of the Supreme Court? Is
the labor union movement gaining in force and if so to what
extent? Has Communism reached or is it likely to reach
a dangerous stage in this country? Are there any other
trends in mass thinking that may have an important bearing on
the economic conditions in this country? Have you any
further suggestions? What about the new trends in modern
ideas or movements - Socialism, Communism, International
Cooperative movements, etc.? Most of the best minds of the
world in all fields are coming to the conclusion that we must
have socialistic cooperation not only within each nation, but
between the nations and the peoples within the different
nations, before we can have any substantial advancement in
the human race. What information, if any, can the
Association for Research and Enlightenment give on these
questions? Are any of the twelve disciples on earth today?
If so, which disciples are they and in which countries are
they to be found? Are we at the present entering into the
"last days" as described by Jesus Christ when he said...
"There will be wars and rumors of wars, etc...therefore know
ye that the Kingdom of God is at hand"? Why are we visited
with pests...such as flies, mosquitoes, boll weevils, etc.,
that seem to do no earthly good? Is America's destiny within
the next few years to be that of war? Despite much
propaganda to the contrary, Hitler seems to have done much to
revive the hopes and aspirations of the German People.
Regardless of what our personal views may be today, how will
history regard him?"
4/18/36 Mr. [
914] and Mr. [
261], members of the Economic
Research Committee of A.R.E., were present for 3976-16.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation