EC: Yes, we have had these before, you see. [GD's note: We
have no copy of previous readings. See [
3777] series.] The
conditions have changed a great deal in the operations, and
the hole, since last we had it here. Rather expensive
proposition to remove tools or to case by at this depth. A
different well, or a location drilled from, would be best,
though may be reached in this hole, but to drill from another
location with the different conditions would be less
expensive, than to clear this, or to case by. To the North
of this, as we have given, by or from the cross structure,
which may be reached northwest toward the southeast, and on
the southeast side, production would be found at a less depth
than has been in this. In this we would find the best show
at 29 to 3100, you see.
In the moving of tolls from this vicinity, at the present
time, to the Laney Well or holdings, you see, there are many
conditions to be considered as to whether it would be better
policy for the Company now operating in the Kopperl vicinity.
We have this condition to be met: First, with the
proposition on which the locations might be made in the Laney
vicinity here, be careful of the condition of the title of
properties first with those that are interested in
developments in the Kopperl vicinity, we have that to
overcome, of the personal interest that may be felt or would
be felt by the moving of the personal interest in the
operations. One becomes separate from the direct influence
of those interested, though the proposition might be made to
be better for operations to be made in the Erath County
holdings if made correct and the titles are in proper shape
before tolls are put on holdings and moneys supplied
sufficient, else there may be entanglements when tools are
wanted to be removed from property. With titles cleared,
with operations for the Erath holdings, we would see would be
better for all conditions at present.
(Q) In what direction from the Laney Well is location best
made for shallow production?
(A) South by East, fifty yards.
(Q) Where would be the next best location, when not possible
to get acreage that close to the holding?
(A) We should keep on this cross structure as is shown
through this district. You see, as the land lays with the
road that runs here, that in the rough and wooded edge being
the better for the oil production, while that to the higher
and farther North and cleared being more pressure from the
gas formations, so follow closer the line that comes for the
overlap here. That condition that needs to be looked after
for the best proposition for financial conditions is to get
rid of the well with first production, because it soon plays
itself out, with the formation as shown, but this might be
[with?] some expense to overcome and be brought back, 26 to
27 to 2800 feet here, beginning in the higher ground here,
beginning with 23 to 58, see. Follow this line for this
uplift or cross structure that comes here for this operation
that has been.
(Q) Is there any merits in the instrument Mr. [
953] has been
using to locate oil?
(A) There is.
(Q) How far does the pool of oil extend from South from East
from the Laney Well, Mr. Cayce?
(A) Where it comes with a cross structure for a mile then
turn almost direct East with this structure, you see.
(Q) Mr. Cayce, in search for a better place to drill in the
Kopperl vicinity, would the next location be best on Mr.
Wyrick's land or South of that?
(A) That, that is not as deep is on the land as we have made
location here before, three to three and one-half miles North
from the Barne's Well at present, that of the shallow depth
on Mr. Wyrick's land.
(Q) At what depth would oil be found on Mr. Wyrick's land,
and how?
(A) Beginning from the 2900 foot, as we have given, and the
production from this would be very, very good, for this would
be the increase production as the pressure is even removed,
increases the flow of the oil for the pressure would come
from the opposite direction or forces. We are through.
BACKGROUND
See [
3777] series?
REPORTS
10/08/23 See
4972-2.



Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation