7/21/65 ALS patient's letter from an A.R.E. member who
borrowed A.R.E. Circulating File on Muscular Atrophy, which
included 5019-1:
Mr. & Mrs. Robert L. Baugh
11824 So. Spinning St.,
Inglewood, California 90303
Dear Mr. Cayce,
I am writing this letter to report to you our experience so
far with the use of the Wet Cell for my problem of amythropic
lateral sclerosis (ALS). First, however, I want to thank
both you and Gladys for searching out for me the readings
relating to ALS.
We have been using the Wet Cell according to the specific
instructions of reading #5019. This was the only one in the
atrophy file in which a definite diagnosis of ALS was made.
My symptoms do not correlate totally with the reading.
However, the reading symptoms and mine each indicate a
very definite diagnosis of this disease. Where I am mostly
affected in the arms and hands, the reading symptoms related
mostly to the legs.
We have followed the treatment since about January 15, with
no apparent results. We had hoped to at least stop the
progress of the disease. Such has not been the case. It has
progressed at a rate consistent with that described in the
medical journals. Although I do believe the massage called
for daily has been of considerable value in maintaining
muscle tone.
I contacted Dr. Hotten and he referred me to a man here in
Torrence, California, who had constructed a Wet Cell, which
I obtained. It follows your description very well except the
terminals are about 8" apart rather than 4". I made several
measurements of internal resistance to direct current with
these terminals varying down to 1" apart and could determine
no difference. Therefore, I have left unit at 8". I
found no particular trouble obtaining chemicals through my
local drug store except we are not sure of the base of the
charcoal. We believe it to be wood.
I found that by wetting the electrodes with saliva the
current could be doubled or even more. So, I have practiced
this. We normally obtain 2 to 4 microamperes while connected
up. Why the variance I do not know. Sometimes we seem to
get a good connection and sometimes not. I'm not sure of the
calibration of my instrument, but I believe the battery shows
a voltage of about 50 milivolts across my meter resistance of
about 2000 ohms.
I have enjoyed my membership in the A.R.E. and found much of
the literature very interesting.
I wish you continued success in promoting and disseminating
information from the readings. The philosophy contained
therein has been a great comfort to me.
Sincerely, [signed] Robert L. Baugh
7/29/65 HLC's reply to ALS patient's letter:
Mr. Robert L. Baugh
11824 South Spinning Street
Inglewood, California 90303
Dear Mr. Baugh:
Thank you for your letter of July 21st giving us a report on
your use of the Wet Cell Appliance. I do hope that you will
continue this for at least a full year period. In many of
the readings it indicated that the effect of the appliance
was very slow, but when it begins to change I believe that
you will be able to see noticeable results.
Do carefully cleanse the anodes both after they are taken
off of the body to remove the film and then before you attach
the anodes to the body at each time of treatment.
Emerypaper or sandpaper should be used to ensure a good
connection. This is most important and was emphasized in a
number of readings.
We look forward to hearing from you again, and we hope that
next time it will be with more encouraging news.
Thank you for your comments regarding the Association data.
Sincerely,
Hugh Lynn Cayce HLC:mle
3/21/68 Dr. Wm. A. McGarey's Commentary for the Circulating
File on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis used Case [
5019] and
[
907].


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation