3/28/44 Mother's letter: "'There Is A River' has
prompted me to write this letter and ask for help. I have 2
boys, age 2 1/2 and 4 1/2. The older boy is quite normal in
every sense. The younger boy, I discovered to be deaf at the
age of 11 1/2 months. The doctors have given no hope that
he will be able to hear. Their viewpoint is that if there is
no nerve there in the ear, nothing can be done to manufacture
one. As a possible hope, the adenoids and tonsils were
removed. Since then, I have accepted this dictum and
proceeded to study methods of teaching lip reading and voice,
and making every effort I could to help him adjust to a
normal sort of life.
"He has a remarkably good disposition, but is often very
difficult to handle and my patience is often lacking. An
added difficulty is that my husband and I are separated. The
first occurrence of this came 2 weeks before I discovered
[
5050] to be deaf. We have tried reconciliation twice
without success. Now I am convinced that I must carry
on alone. My thought has been to take a job to earn the
necessary money for his schooling which will start in the
autumn. He has a tutor now. We must move to ..., N.Y. for
schooling. It means a very drastic change for all of us. To
add to the difficulty, the type of work I really like to do
is not very remunerative. I like to work with people and for
people. This is a major problem that I must decide, inasmuch
as it affects the children. We are now living in the suburbs
where the children can play out of doors and lead a far more
natural life than they would lead in the city. Also, if I
take a job, their afternoon after school hours will be in
charge of someone else, and I am not sure that I feel quite
satisfied with this. Now then, these are the worst problems.
Would it be possible for you to give my son a reading soon?
The whole situation seems urgent to me, of course, because of
so many decisions in the immediate offing... When [
5050] was
about 6 or 7 months old he had a bad fall in the car. It may
be that this affected his hearing."
4/20/44 Uncle's letter: "...When I saw you in Virginia
Beach, I mentioned the case of my nephew, age 2 years 8
months, who is apparently deaf - at least he has not yet
responded to any sound; consequently his speech has not
developed. My own reading is scheduled for May 5. My
interest, as you know, is deep and spiritual, but I feel that
this golden opportunity should be given over to this baby
boy. Would you mind if I transferred my reading to him? My
sister has written you recently, therefore I am enclosing the
form which she has filled out. I trust that the fee that I
sent for membership will cover the reading. At the close of
the reading, I understand that questions may be asked. They
are as follows: (1) Is there any evidence that the nerve in
the middle ear is existent? (2) Is the deafness partial or
complete? (3) If the nerve is there but not alive, is there
any treatment which might build it up? (4) Is there any
difference in the mechanism between the left ear and the
right ear? (5) If the child is completely deaf, was he born
so, and why? (6) Is there any evidence that deafness was
caused by a fall? (7) Have any other parts of the body been
injured which would affect hearing? (8) Would infant stomach
and internal digestive disorders affect hearing?... All our
hopes for this child's possibility of hearing lie within your
wonderful powers. Certainly more important than my humble
troubles. Both my sister and I will meditate at the
appointed hour. Would you please be so good as to send the
reading direct to my sister... Thank you, dear Mr. Cayce. I
trust that all are well in your household."
REPORTS
5/10/44 Mother of [
5050] wrote: "My brother has just
sent on the record of the reading given for my wee deaf
boy. We shall proceed according to instructions. I have an
osteopath in mind who may be able to administer treatments.
I shall notify you of the osteopath's name, as you requested.
The reading is most encouraging, and we shall certainly be
faithful to instructions. May I express my thanks to you."
5/12/44 EC's reply: "...I am glad to know that you were
pleased with the information that was given for your little
boy. I do hope that you will give the suggestions a real
trial, and I believe you will get results..."
5/12/44 Mother's letter: "In reference to your reading
for my son, I have found an osteopath who is willing to
follow the instructions given. There are, however, a number
of questions we would like to ask. The most important
deal with the Wet Cell Appliance. Because of my difficult
financial position, the osteopath, Dr. J. O. H. [Edward
Johnson, D.O.] of ..., N.J., and I, along with an electrical
engineer, a Mr. S. I. E. [Siebert], are anxious to know if we
could obtain directions for making the appliance ourselves.
It seems from the directions you have sent that it is
a fairly simple mechanism. The materials would also be
available. One of the things that baffles us in the actual
construction is the location of the smaller jar through which
the nickel rod runs to the nickel plate. The other major
question is: Would it be possible to use a dry cell to carry
this low frequency to the body? According to standard laws
of electricity, the particular form of generation does not
effect the electricity itself. In the work that you have
done in this connection, what is the basis of using the Wet
Cell instead of the dry cell? Is there a difference in the
result, and why? One of the reasons for making this inquiry
is that my son is a very active child, and the administration
of the Wet Cell Appliance is apt to be distinctly dangerous
because of the sulfuric acid. It is going to be extremely
difficult to keep him quiet. Only because I fully realize
the importance of carrying out instructions implicitly
am I making these inquiries. I would appreciate further
enlightenment."
5/16/44 EC's reply: "I have yours of the 12th regarding
the Appliance. There is no objection to giving you complete
directions for making the Appliance; however, we know from
some 40 years of experience that you would be many months
getting the necessary materials together for making the
Appliance. The dry cell will not do for this sort of work.
There are occasions when this has been given but not in this
case; it would be too strong for your boy. Write to Mr.
Godfrey and tell him to send you an Appliance, and put it on
my account. When you are through with it, return it to Mr.
Godfrey. I am sure the information had it in mind that the
Appliance be used on your boy when he is sleeping. He will
not feel any vibrations and it will not awaken him; rather
it will tend to keep him asleep. Please do this won't you?
I would like very much to contribute something toward helping
the young man for your brother's sake. I liked him very
much. Hoping this will prove satisfactory and that the
doctor will work with you all the way through..."
Mother's letter to A. M. Godfrey: "According to a letter
from Mr. Cayce, he has asked me to write you for the Wet
Cell Appliance to be charged to his account, and when we
are finished with it, we will return it to you, as per Mr.
Cayce's instructions." [In 1950, A. M. Godfrey turned over
to A.R.E. whatever data he had in his possession concerning
orders for Wet Cell Appliances. However, in this case, there
is no record of an order for a refill, or any correspondence
showing that the Wet Cell Appliance had been returned.]
7/24/44 Mother's letter: "My brother showed me your
recent letter to him, and we are both very grateful to you
for your interest in wee [
5050]'s problem. As my brother
wrote you, we have been delayed in beginning operations as
instructed in the reading due to another bad fall, followed
by mumps. You will be pleased to hear, however, that
we started last week on Monday. Dr. J. O. H. [Johnson]
administered osteopathic adjustments every afternoon,
Monday through Friday. Every night after my son was asleep,
I administered the Wet Cell Appliance as instructed by
Mr. Godfrey, for 4 nights. Then we let off until last
night, when the Wet Cell Treatments were resumed. In the
application of the Wet Cell we have had some difficulty
getting my son to be quiet. Often the mere putting on the
attachments to his body awakens him, and then I am obliged to
wait until he quiets down again before I try again. He pulls
them right off otherwise. Often, he does not get to sleep
until 9 or 10 P.M., so that the treatments come after this.
"This week we are applying the cocoa butter as directed.
We are giving these just before his noon nap. He is more
relaxed and ready for such at this time, than he would be
in the morning. Do you feel that this is all right? We
are most anxious to do this correctly, and that is why I am
asking these questions and telling you exactly what we are
doing. The osteopathic adjustments will be given weekly
beginning this week. There was no indication in the
instructions as to how long we should continue these
operations. Have you any suggestions in this regard? The
osteopath says that there seemed to be no stiffness in
the regions where he was instructed to work. We are
most anxious to follow your instructions..."
8/15/44 Mother's letter: "...We started the osteopathic
treatments in conjunction with the Wet Cell treatments about
a month ago or a little more. The first week, the osteopath
gave treatments in the regions directed for 5 days, and has
since given a weekly treatment. Following the first week of
osteopathic treatments, we have given cocoa butter massages
every day just before his afternoon nap. In connection
with the Wet Cell treatments there have been a number of
difficulties. In the first place, it is very difficult,
sometimes impossible to keep him still, even though
operations are commenced while my son is asleep. I have
some times stayed up until after 1 o'clock waiting for him to
quiet down. At the same time, we have had great difficulty
to sleep at all during the night. Inasmuch as I go to
business during the day for 5 days a week, I felt it
advisable to give the treatments at night after he had gone
to sleep. In that way, we could be consistent throughout. I
would be very much interested in any comments you may have or
any suggestions as to procedure. As for results, the doctor
has found no tenseness in the regions affected; we have
noticed, however, an increasing interest in a large alarm
clock with a loud tick. My son holds it up to his ear as if
listening; then holds it to the ear of the person with him.
The interest is quite protracted for a child of his age, who
frequently flits from one thing to another with considerable
rapidity. I don't suppose there is any way of knowing what
progress we are making or whether we are doing exactly the
right thing, especially in relation to the timing of the
various operations..."
"I have discussed the whole situation with my brother, by
whom the arrangement for the reading was made. My brother
is just about to sail for Europe to aid in the civilian
reconstruction program..."
8/18/44 EC's reply: "...It has been necessary for me to be
away for some time, and I am just getting back to
correspondence. I am pleased to know that you are getting
started on the treatments for your son, and I believe the
closer you follow through, the better will be the results.
I am sure that you recall that the Appliance has to be
recharged every 30 days; that is, new solution. I don't know
just how long this has to be kept up. It depends entirely on
circumstances, but if it will bring help, I am sure it won't
make any difference to you... Sometimes, of course, an
osteopath disagrees and will say there is no confusion,
where the information indicates certain treatment should be
given. Yet more times than not, results are obtained if the
information is followed. It is up to you and the doctor...
The only way I know of to get any sure report, is to have a
check reading. We will want to do this anyway and very soon,
if it is possible..."
10/31/44 Letter: "In the last 6 weeks, some very
distressing things have been occurring with my son... I
pursued your recommendations with care up until the middle
of September, at which time we moved to New York so that my
son could go to a special school for the deaf. We had many
difficulties applying the treatments, as I wrote to you
earlier because we could not keep him asleep. This situation
became much worse after moving, and my son spent most of the
night awake playing, and for the last 6 weeks having tantrums
of one sort or another. Our whole family life has been
completely upset - no one in the house can get any rest day
or night, and in view of the fact that I support the children
from my job, it is essential that I keep reasonably in one
piece. We have come to the point where I have been getting
in the last period 2 to 4 hours of sleep a night. I am
greatly distressed for the consequences to my son and his
brother, and am writing to see whether you would still be
able to give us a check reading as you suggested in the
summer. Consultation with doctors has proved fruitless, and
I believe that as Browning would say: 'glory from defect may
arise.' Could you fit in a check reading? If so, please let
us know, and be sure to take note of the new address."
11/06/44 IMG's letter: "Due to Mr. Cayce's continued
illness, we are unable to get your son's Check Physical
Reading... We would suggest that you continue to use the
information already given..."
1/28/48 Test mailing to mother. Whereabouts unknown.
7/50 While the uncle was overseas his interest in the
A.R.E. continued, as evidenced by his correspondence.
7/27/50 Questionnaire-letter sent to uncle.
9/21/50 Uncle's reply to questionnaire-letter: "The
form which you sent to me regarding the reading for my nephew
has been forwarded to his mother who now lives in ..., Conn.
Unfortunately the treatment prescribed for his deafness was
unsuccessful, and I do not believe that it was tried again."
9/10/52 No verbal or written contact on this case since
9/21/50.
5/22/71 Brother wrote: "Would you please send a copy of
the rdg. and any subsequent rdgs., as the rdgs. were either
ignored or improperly administered. Thank you."
6/02/71 A copy of 5050-1 was sent to brother.
4/08/77 Brother of [
5050] visited A.R.E. and said he
never received copy of the reading. He was given another
copy of 5050-1.
11/09/77 Brother visited A.R.E. and requested copy of
5050-1 stating he didn't know whether his brother received
the previous copy he had sent to him.


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation