3/28/50 Reply to questionnaire: "Yes, I still have a copy
of my Life Reading by Mr. Cayce. I have re-read it perhaps
a dozen times, and still get a better understanding of its
meaning each time. No other person is present each time I
read it. I consider it a personal matter and of no concern
to another. I have explained some phases of it to friends,
without actually showing it. You know the old saying about
casting pearls. In view of the fact that Mr. Cayce could
not have known anything about me from a physical standpoint,
the reading is remarkably accurate. I have been - in this
life - connected with newspaper and advertising work almost
exclusively. My hobby, rather undeveloped, is painting and
its associated arts. Had he lived, I would have wished for
a subsequent reading giving more about the incarnation just
preceding the present one.
It is difficult for me to give specific reasons why I
believe in reincarnation of the soul. It just seems the most
reasonable and satisfying explanation of why we exist. I
have been a Rosicrucian and gave that up temporarily because
I felt the people in California were more interested in
the publishing business than in research. It is strung
out seemingly endlessly, telling you what you may expect
to learn sometime in the future lessons. I get more out of
the monograph by your organization 'Life Reading - Study of
Spiritual Evolution' and I wish I could get into some direct
and concise study, not so wrapped up in verbiage that it
takes a lawyer to understand. It seems that the idea of
living several lives in different planes of consciousness
would be the logical way to develop and perfect a soul. The
rough stone that rolls down the mountain will become smooth.
The metaphor is faulty, since we aspire to CLIMB the hill.
Karma is the consequence of our thoughts and actions in
various reincarnations, and may be expiated, if we are
willing and take the time. I have not changed vocation, but
would favor it. While I claim no outstanding improvement, I
have changed my attitude toward others, whether as a result
of the reading or maturity of my years, I am not prepared
to say. I suspect the reading played a good part. I have
not systematically set aside a time for self analysis, but
almost daily as a habit. I am weak, but there is a slow
improvement. I am afraid that, in common with most mortals
in the western world, I am more concerned with making a
living than in doing a monumental job for the betterment
of mankind. I do not boast of this, but it is a fact.
In order to best carry forward the work which Edgar Cayce
started, I suggest that you steer clear of anything that
will give the public the idea that you are visionary, fanatic
or have hallucinations. Be conservative in all utterances.
People of low intelligence, and we have a majority of these,
are in their own minds, the only real oracles. Most people
are tolerant of all who agree with them. What they have not
seen, they cannot accredit.
The comment about the mustache was very interesting, because
in Rosicrucian studies and experiments, it was evident. If
you are familiar with that, you will understand. It must
have meant a former incarnation, because although I have
worn such a decoration, it was of the conservative type,
but at one time it was clipped, as was the vogue, a la
Chaplin, Hitler, etc. It would hardly evoke Mr. Cayce's
exclamation as it was worn in this life.
It would be interesting if one could look up the vital
records of Canada, where I was supposed to have spent the
previous life, and see if there was an Oscar Wheeler there at
any time in the past. Might even be some record of the life.
At the suggestion of the notation at the end of the reading,
I exchanged correspondence with Mrs. [
3395], and was
permitted to read her Reading. There again, the records
of Chicago should be verification of the life she lived
previously. It specifically speaks of Fort Dearborn.
Some of the Cayce observations on religion smack of the
Epworth League, and this is not my conception of the 'Hall
of Records'. It was one of the things that injured my faith
in the reading. I believe in Jesus of Nazareth as a great
metaphysician and one possessed of great powers, but I do
not believe in the Gospel writers' presentation of Him as
the official representative of God Almighty, the Creator and
Ruler of the universe. He was more a political figure than a
God. Today, He would have been in the battle to re-establish
His beloved Israel in the political power it has achieved.
The story of the Immaculate Conception is almost word for
word that of Hercules - I am told, though I never read it.
Other religions have the same story. That, to me does
not matter so far as the greatness of the Master and Great
Avatar is concerned, but it does spoil things when presented
by those reared in the evangelical tradition of the
Protestant and Catholic Churches.
I hope this is of value, and I will be happy to clarify
anything I can further."
7/24/52 No record of verbal or written contact on this case
since
3/25/50.


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation