10/29/49 [
5201]'s reply to Questionnaire:
Q-1. Do you still have a copy of your Life Reading?
A-1. "Yes, indeed."
Q-2. How many times have you read your Life Reading?
(If many times, give approximate number.)
A-2. "Not many, but at intervals."
Q-3. Did you read it to or with someone else and, if so,
what was the relation of the person to you?
A-3. "Two close friends heard it soon after I received it."
Q-4. Have you given a copy of your reading to anyone and, if
so, what was the relationship to you of that person?
A-4. "I let one friend have a copy with a phrase or two
deleted."
Q-5. How recently have you read your Life Reading?
A-5. "In the last year or two, I think?"
Q-6. In what respects do you feel that your Life Reading was
(1) true, (2) false, (3) correct, (4) imaginary, (5) hocus
pocus, (6) inaccurate, (7) incomplete, (8) trivial?
A-6. "Very, very true about music, incomplete with respect
to past incarnations."
Q-7. Do you believe in a reincarnation of the soul and, if
so, why?
A-7. "Yes - because I seem to have met people whom I knew
before."
Q-8. What is your idea or concept of karma? Is it (a) a
state to which a people aspire, (b) a state to which an
individual aspires, (c) an environmental influence, (d) a
hereditary influence, (e) something you yourself have done or
thought or left undone and unthought in a previous
incarnation?
A-8. "Possibly (e) - its action and reaction."
Q-9. Have you in any respect consciously changed your
(1) vocation, (2) thoughts, (3) actions or reactions toward
others as a result of your Life Reading?
A-9. "I sought in a quiet way musical people."
Q-10. Assuming your life to be no casual accident or
experiment, do you have any new or different concept as to
the purpose of your life as a result of your Life Reading?
A-10. "Music as a possibility which it never was before."
Q-11. Have you ever systematically or otherwise set a part
of your day, week, month or any other period of your time for
introspection or an examination and analysis of your inner
self (and we do not mean writing in a diary) as suggested in
your Life Reading? If not, why not and, if so, are there any
results measurable to you?
A-11. "Yes - but I do not meditate or pray regularly. I
just am more comfortable spontaneously."
Q-12. Do you regard your vocation, whether it be as laborer,
supervisor, manager, official, engineer, lawyer, doctor,
housewife, mother, or what not, as the dominant force in your
life or do you look upon your vocation as an agency through
which you can the better fulfill your purpose in this life?
A-12. "An agency."
Q-13. How, in your opinion, can our Association best carry
on the work of Edgar Cayce and the good for which he stood?
A-13. "I have wondered often but still don't have an idea."
Q-14. What have you done about bringing music into your
life?
A-14. "I bought a little harp but found it confusing to
learn. But I have studied singing again with a new point of
view and am very happy in it."
2/12/52 Article from Coatesville paper:
[
1/22/52 GD requested from the U.S. Weather Bureau in
Pomeroy, Pennsylvania, the weather conditions on June 7, 1900
in Pomeroy. The responses to that request appear below.]
THE COATESVILLE RECORD, COATESVILLE, PA. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY
12, 1952
WHAT KIND OF A DAY WAS JUNE 7, 1900, IN POMEROY? IT'S
IMPORTANT TO KNOW
A research foundation down in Virginia Beach, Va., has
written to the "Regional Director, United States Department
of Commerce, U.S. Weather Bureau, Pomeroy, Pa.," whoever or
whatever that might be, asking what kind of weather Pomeroy
enjoyed between 12.01 a.m. and 12 midnight on June 7, 1900.
The letter somehow fell into the hands of City Clerk Frank
P. Pennegar who looked at it once and gave up.
Perhaps there is someone living in this vicinity who was
married on that day or who remembers the day by some other
momentous event who could tell just what kind of a day it
was. Then somebody may have an old diary that would give
this information. If some one had the patience to look up
the late William T. Gordon's weather records he could find
out what kind of a day it was in Coatesville and it is very
likely that the same kind of weather existed in Pomeroy, four
miles west.
It is pretty certain that it did not snow in Pomeroy on that
day or that the temperature dropped down to zero. According
to the calendar June 7, 1900 was a Thursday. Pomeroy was a
busy place at that time. John Leech was the PRR station
agent and Howard Emery was his assistant. Bill Schofield ran
the PRR freight station, while John H. Irwin was section
foreman. The Pomeroy & Newark railroad was operating two
round trips a day to Newark, Delaware and Amos Osmond was
conductor of the train. The round trip railroad fare from
Pomeroy to Philadelphia was $2.11.
Farmers from all around brought their milk to Pomeroy station
to send it to Philadelphia on the milk train. They generally
came in plenty of time and hung around the station swapping
stories until the train came and then helped to place the
milk aboard. This morning's meeting of the farmers served as
a news dispensing agency. Among the subjects discussed at
that time was the new store that B. F. Meredith, Sr., was
opening in the village, and the political prospects of Frank
Russell.
Squire Stern whose long white beard was the envy of Santa
Claus held court in his coal yard office. A large amount of
feldspar from the Meredith quarries in West Caln was being
shipped from Pomeroy, and the McManus quarries were running
full blast. George K. Irwin was the "paper boy" who carried
the papers to Sadsburyville each day. Things really were
happening in Pomeroy on that date but that doesn't answer the
question at hand. Perhaps someone with more information can
do so.
2/16/52 Newspaper article in response to the
1/22/52 letter
from Gladys Davis requesting weather information for June 7,
1900 in Pomeroy, Pennsylvania:
COATESVILLE, PA., SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1952
JUNE 7, 1900, WAS VERY FIND DAY IN POMEROY BUT NEXT DAY IT
RAINED!
Thursday, June 7, 1900 was a very fine day in both
Coatesville and Brandywine Manor, and it must have been a
fine day in Pomeroy too. So a momentous question raised by a
research organization located at Virginia Beach, Va., has at
last been satisfactorily settled.
Frank Glading, of the Scott Senior High School, looked up the
records of the late William T. Gordon, who for many years was
United States weather observer here, and found that while the
weather in Coatesville - which is four miles due east of
Pomeroy, was fine on that day and for several days
previously, the next day it rained.
Mr. Gordon's record for the day was: "Temperature 7 a.m. 63
degrees; 2 p.m, 85 degrees; 9 p.m., 70 degrees; maximum 85
degrees; minimum 45 degrees; mean temperature, 71.4 degrees;
daily range, 31 degrees; light wind, very fine day." At
12:30 a.m. the following day it started to rain and .07 of an
inch fell.
June 7, 1900 was also a fine day at Brandywine Manor, ten
miles northeast of Pomeroy, according to Mrs. Hattie N.
McClure Forest, who writes the Record:
"In your columns of February 12 there is an inquiry
concerning the weather of June 7, 1900. I have kept a diary
for many years and so I went to the attic and found the 1900
edition. That day was pleasant and pretty hot with morning
temperature registering 51 degrees. I had no trouble
remembering the day as it was my father's birthday - namely
J. Grier McClure.
"Hattie N. McClure Forest,
(Mrs. Elmer W. Forest)"
And that's that.
3/28/52 GD's note: Could the exclamation made by EC at the
beginning of 5201-1, "1900 - What an unusually stormy day!"
have reference to political discussions or happenings; or
perhaps to some stormy discussion right in [
5201]'s family at
the time? [See Mrs. [
5201]'s
7/22/79 letter at Par. R10
below, saying: "Uncle Howard once remarked - What a stormy
day I was born on. He belonged to a family known for its
faculty to remember."]
7/08/60 E.C.F. mailing,to enquire if she had done any
research on her former incarnation as Martha Cusic, was ret'd
UNCLAIMED.
7/05/79 Mrs. [
5201] requested a copy of her rdg. and data in
re A.R.E. membership.
7/11/79 E.C.F. sent a copy of her rdg.
and requested some feedback for validation regarding her Life
Rdg.
7/22/79 Mrs. [
5201] wrote with comments on her Life Rdg., and
in response to validation request:
Dear Ms. Cayce. [J. Gail Cayce]:
Please have warm appreciation for sending the copy of my
reading to me. A check ($10.00) is enclosed to reimburse you
for the costs of same.
"COMMENTS:
RE: THE EXCLAMATION 'WHAT AN UNUSUALLY STORMY DAY (JUNE 7,
1900)' Uncle Howard once remarked - What a very stormy day
I was born on. He belonged to a family known for its faculty
to remember.
RE: MUSIC - I have wondered if Mr. Cayce because he
perceived a deep-seated need for harmony in me, projected
that need to music. The reply
10/27/79 on this topic is
correct.
RE: MARRIAGE - The hope to marry again, indicated as a
possibility by Mr. Cayce - UNFULFILLED. Not even a man
friend. I have wondered if the sister in this life could be
the "companion" referred to by Mr. Cayce on page 3 [5201-1,
Par. 13]. The relationship with the sister has been a steady
agonizing defeat - no fights, not hot words - just insults,
humiliations, rejections 1906-1979. Tho advised by a doctor
to avoid a rupture, I should long ago have shed the bondage
to her, and therefore suspect sex as the underlying cause of
it.
RE: ANSWERS AND QUESTIONNAIRE
10/29/49 [Par. R4 above] - My
answer to #6 should have been "helpful, but still obsure" on
occupation and music, and to #9 - should be "not much."
I might add that taken as a whole, the reading does seem,
now after 35 years, as incomplete. I had hoped for more.
However, it has been very satisfying to have the copy, and I
thank you."
Sincerely, [
5201]
7/27/79 E.C.F. wrote thanking her for her contribution and
for confirmation comments on her reading.
8/08/79 GD sent to her a copy of the
7/08/60 questionnaire
which was ret'd UNCLAIMED, asking if she had done any
research on her American incarnation in Philadelphia as
Martha Cusic.


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation