6/23/44 Letter: "I very much regret to say that my reading
on the 15 of June was very disappointing; so much so, that
I think I will analyse it a little, if I may. Your first
remark in the form of a question, 'Why doesn't she stay in
her room?' shows error at the start. We live in a hotel
apartment, 3 rooms and kitchenette, dinette and bath. You
will recall the first appointment for reading was for May
10... You stated in the letter that followed, that you
could not locate the body. I answered and said that at the
specified time I was in our living room which faces the east
during the entire hour. Now on June 15, I was in this same
living room from 3:00 to 4:30 P.M., EWT., or 2 P.M. to 3:30
P.M., our time. At no time during that 1 hour and 40 minutes
was I out of said living room. I went into the room early
for prayer and meditation, and was not out of the chair in
which I seated myself for the entire time. The body could
not have been 'on the way' at any time between 3:30 and 4:40
EWT., because it was stationary before, during and after
said hour. Now as to your 2nd paragraph, you refer to ears,
taste, and throat. I have not now and never have had any
trouble with ears or taste, and only very rarely a sore
throat, and no other throat trouble. As to the eyes,
references to previous correspondence will show that I have
written you telling of my eye trouble. As to osteopathic
treatments, I have had them in the past. As to short-wave
treatments, I have been informed that short-wave is a
heat producing instrument, and not an instrument producing
vibrations. Is my information correct? Now referring to
A-2: Said answer is ambiguous. What 'activities' should be
eliminated? Now to question 3: I think if you will refer
to my application sheet, you will find this was not the
question asked. If answered, would have required an
entirely different answer, it seems to me. Mr. Casey, I am
disappointed deeply. Perhaps so much so, because I had built
high hopes. To be quite frank with you, there is no analysis
of my condition except as I had already stated to you. Such
other analysis is largely in error. I can hardly believe
after having read the book 'There Is A River' by Thomas
Sugrue, and literature from the Association, that what was
sent me was your reading. My physical condition is very much
different from what was indicated in the reading. Now here
is a thought: Could my prayerful attitude asking for divine
presence to fill the room, and a chanting of 'OM' during
that hour and 40 minutes, have in any way interfered with the
reading? Or should I have been in a more passive or negative
attitude? I was in the same prayerful attitude and chanting
on May 10, at which time you could not 'locate the body'".
7/11/44 EC's letter: "...I am very sorry indeed to know what
you have to say about your reading. Such things, I am sure,
must be looked for sometimes. This is possibly one out
of a thousand, but if you return the data, we will be very
glad to return your membership fee. I am sorry to be of a
disappointment. I can't explain it to you because I don't
know. What comes - comes, and what doesn't - well, we can't
supply other words. Thank you for writing me..."
9/26/49 Questionnaire sent. No reply.
3/18/52 Notation by IMG: No record of verbal or written
contact on this case since letter of
6/23/44.
6/26/52 Dr. Moeser's [chiropractor] oral report to GD: "Mr.
and Mrs. [
5229] - both chiropractors after a fashion, and
teachers of metaphysics, apparently combine metaphysics with
chiropractic. They turn out students without the approval or
authorization of the Chiropractic Association.
"Possibly, Mrs. [
5229]'s positiveness and meditative state
clashed with EC's purpose in giving the reading, resulting
in the statement at the beginning: 'Why doesn't she stay in
her room?...' with regard to the answer of Q-3, it might be
because she turns out poorly equipped chiropractors who do
more harm than good in practicing their profession."
The demand for readings in 1943-1944 was so great that
appointments were made many months in advance. Since EC's
desire was to help all who requested readings, he sometimes
gave as many as 6 during one period. When it became a
physical impossibility to keep this schedule, the overflow
appointments would be cancelled, or on rare occasions left
for the next period. Thus the problem arose to locate
the individual during that specific hour. Under such
circumstances, the Suggestion by GC would be worded: "Now,
you will have before you the body of ..., who was at ..."
The discrepancy in time could account for EC's failure to
locate the body of Mrs. [
5229].


Edgar Cayce Readings © 1971, 1993, 1994, 1995 by the Edgar Cayce Foundation